Cargando…

Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture

Objective: The fracture of the tibial shaft is the most common fracture of long bone in human. Considerable proportion of this fractures are open fractures. Treatment of open fractures is one of the orthopedic problems. In the developing country with economic problem, early mobilization and returnin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakoor, Mohammad, Sarrafan, Naser, Naghizadeh-Tabrizi, Naser, Fakoor, Morteza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353519
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.291.2722
_version_ 1782288653957988352
author Fakoor, Mohammad
Sarrafan, Naser
Naghizadeh-Tabrizi, Naser
Fakoor, Morteza
author_facet Fakoor, Mohammad
Sarrafan, Naser
Naghizadeh-Tabrizi, Naser
Fakoor, Morteza
author_sort Fakoor, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description Objective: The fracture of the tibial shaft is the most common fracture of long bone in human. Considerable proportion of this fractures are open fractures. Treatment of open fractures is one of the orthopedic problems. In the developing country with economic problem, early mobilization and returning to work may be important for people. We compared result of treatment with addition of autogenus bone graft in two different time periods in two groups. Methodology: In this study, 144 patients with open tibial fracture were randomly divided in two groups and were treated with autogenus bone graft at two different time intervals, the first group in the end of third week and second group in the end of sixth week. All Patients were followed up periodically in first two month every month and then every two weeks. T-test was used for comparison. SPSS ver. 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analysis. Results: The mean fracture healing time in the first group (with bone graft in 3rd week) was 14.24±4.4 week and in the second group (with bone graft in 6th week) was 16.4±5.4 week and the difference was statistically meaningful. Differences in the rate of delayed union and none union in two groups were statistically insignificant. In addition to time of bone graft, the age, gender, injury mechanism, fixation method, cigarette smoking and drug abuse were studied in two groups. The difference as regards these factors in two groups was statically insignificant. Conclusions: Achievement of autogenus bone graft in open tibial fracture at the end of third week causes reduction of union time from 16.4 week to 14.4 week without increment of deep infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3809178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38091782013-12-18 Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture Fakoor, Mohammad Sarrafan, Naser Naghizadeh-Tabrizi, Naser Fakoor, Morteza Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: The fracture of the tibial shaft is the most common fracture of long bone in human. Considerable proportion of this fractures are open fractures. Treatment of open fractures is one of the orthopedic problems. In the developing country with economic problem, early mobilization and returning to work may be important for people. We compared result of treatment with addition of autogenus bone graft in two different time periods in two groups. Methodology: In this study, 144 patients with open tibial fracture were randomly divided in two groups and were treated with autogenus bone graft at two different time intervals, the first group in the end of third week and second group in the end of sixth week. All Patients were followed up periodically in first two month every month and then every two weeks. T-test was used for comparison. SPSS ver. 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for analysis. Results: The mean fracture healing time in the first group (with bone graft in 3rd week) was 14.24±4.4 week and in the second group (with bone graft in 6th week) was 16.4±5.4 week and the difference was statistically meaningful. Differences in the rate of delayed union and none union in two groups were statistically insignificant. In addition to time of bone graft, the age, gender, injury mechanism, fixation method, cigarette smoking and drug abuse were studied in two groups. The difference as regards these factors in two groups was statically insignificant. Conclusions: Achievement of autogenus bone graft in open tibial fracture at the end of third week causes reduction of union time from 16.4 week to 14.4 week without increment of deep infection. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3809178/ /pubmed/24353519 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.291.2722 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fakoor, Mohammad
Sarrafan, Naser
Naghizadeh-Tabrizi, Naser
Fakoor, Morteza
Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title_full Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title_fullStr Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title_short Assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
title_sort assessment of prophylactic bone grafting effect on union of open tibial fracture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353519
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.291.2722
work_keys_str_mv AT fakoormohammad assessmentofprophylacticbonegraftingeffectonunionofopentibialfracture
AT sarrafannaser assessmentofprophylacticbonegraftingeffectonunionofopentibialfracture
AT naghizadehtabrizinaser assessmentofprophylacticbonegraftingeffectonunionofopentibialfracture
AT fakoormorteza assessmentofprophylacticbonegraftingeffectonunionofopentibialfracture