Cargando…

Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey

Objective: To determine the predisposing factors, modes of clinical presentation, management modalities and fetomaternal outcomes of uterine rupture cases at a tertiary care center in Turkey. Methodology: A 14-year retrospective analysis of 61 gravid (>20 weeks of gestation) uterine rupture cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turgut, Abdulkadir, Ozler, Ali, Siddik Evsen, Mehmet, Ender Soydinc, Hatice, Yaman Goruk, Neval, Karacor, Talip, Gul, Talip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353622
_version_ 1782288683564531712
author Turgut, Abdulkadir
Ozler, Ali
Siddik Evsen, Mehmet
Ender Soydinc, Hatice
Yaman Goruk, Neval
Karacor, Talip
Gul, Talip
author_facet Turgut, Abdulkadir
Ozler, Ali
Siddik Evsen, Mehmet
Ender Soydinc, Hatice
Yaman Goruk, Neval
Karacor, Talip
Gul, Talip
author_sort Turgut, Abdulkadir
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine the predisposing factors, modes of clinical presentation, management modalities and fetomaternal outcomes of uterine rupture cases at a tertiary care center in Turkey. Methodology: A 14-year retrospective analysis of 61 gravid (>20 weeks of gestation) uterine rupture cases between January 1998 to March 2012 was carried out. Results: The incidence of ruptured uteri was calculated to be 0.116%. Persistence for vaginal delivery after cesarean was the most common cause of uterine rupture (31.1%). Ablatio placenta was the most common co-existent obstetric pathology (4.9%). Bleeding was the main symptom at presentation (44.3%) and complete type of uterine rupture (93.4%) was more likely to occur. Isthmus was the most vulnerable part of uterus (39.3%) for rupture. The longer the interval between rupture and surgical intervention, the longer the duration of hospitalization was. Older patients with increased number of previous pregnancies were likely to have longer hospitalization periods. Conclusion: Rupture of gravid uterus brings about potentially hazardous risks. Regular antenatal care, hospital deliveries and vigilance during labor with quick referral to a well-equipped center may reduce the incidence of this condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3809304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38093042013-12-18 Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey Turgut, Abdulkadir Ozler, Ali Siddik Evsen, Mehmet Ender Soydinc, Hatice Yaman Goruk, Neval Karacor, Talip Gul, Talip Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: To determine the predisposing factors, modes of clinical presentation, management modalities and fetomaternal outcomes of uterine rupture cases at a tertiary care center in Turkey. Methodology: A 14-year retrospective analysis of 61 gravid (>20 weeks of gestation) uterine rupture cases between January 1998 to March 2012 was carried out. Results: The incidence of ruptured uteri was calculated to be 0.116%. Persistence for vaginal delivery after cesarean was the most common cause of uterine rupture (31.1%). Ablatio placenta was the most common co-existent obstetric pathology (4.9%). Bleeding was the main symptom at presentation (44.3%) and complete type of uterine rupture (93.4%) was more likely to occur. Isthmus was the most vulnerable part of uterus (39.3%) for rupture. The longer the interval between rupture and surgical intervention, the longer the duration of hospitalization was. Older patients with increased number of previous pregnancies were likely to have longer hospitalization periods. Conclusion: Rupture of gravid uterus brings about potentially hazardous risks. Regular antenatal care, hospital deliveries and vigilance during labor with quick referral to a well-equipped center may reduce the incidence of this condition. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3809304/ /pubmed/24353622 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Turgut, Abdulkadir
Ozler, Ali
Siddik Evsen, Mehmet
Ender Soydinc, Hatice
Yaman Goruk, Neval
Karacor, Talip
Gul, Talip
Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title_full Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title_fullStr Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title_short Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey
title_sort uterine rupture revisited: predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in turkey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353622
work_keys_str_mv AT turgutabdulkadir uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT ozlerali uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT siddikevsenmehmet uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT endersoydinchatice uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT yamangorukneval uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT karacortalip uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey
AT gultalip uterinerupturerevisitedpredisposingfactorsclinicalfeaturesmanagementandoutcomesfromatertiarycarecenterinturkey