Cargando…

Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine an optimal antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We evaluated the antibacterial effects of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements loaded with vancomycin, teicoplanin, ceft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Y., Tai, C-L., Hsieh, P-H., Ueng, S. W. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24128666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.210.2000188
_version_ 1782288712862793728
author Chang, Y.
Tai, C-L.
Hsieh, P-H.
Ueng, S. W. N.
author_facet Chang, Y.
Tai, C-L.
Hsieh, P-H.
Ueng, S. W. N.
author_sort Chang, Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine an optimal antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We evaluated the antibacterial effects of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements loaded with vancomycin, teicoplanin, ceftazidime, imipenem, piperacillin, gentamicin, and tobramycin against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Standardised cement specimens made from 40 g PMMA loaded with 1 g antibiotics were tested for elution characteristics, antibacterial activities, and compressive strength in vitro. RESULTS: The ALBC containing gentamicin provided a much longer duration of antibiotic release than those containing other antibiotic. Imipenem-loading on the cement had a significant adverse effect on the compressive strength of the ALBC, which made it insufficient for use in prosthesis fixation. All of the tested antibiotics maintained their antibacterial properties after being mixed with PMMA. The gentamicin-loaded ALBC provided a broad antibacterial spectrum against all the test organisms and had the greatest duration of antibacterial activity against MSSA, CoNS, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. CONCLUSION: When considering the use of ALBC as infection prophylaxis in TJA, gentamicin-loaded ALBC may be a very effective choice. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:220–6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3809714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38097142013-10-30 Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty Chang, Y. Tai, C-L. Hsieh, P-H. Ueng, S. W. N. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine an optimal antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) for infection prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: We evaluated the antibacterial effects of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cements loaded with vancomycin, teicoplanin, ceftazidime, imipenem, piperacillin, gentamicin, and tobramycin against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staph. aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Standardised cement specimens made from 40 g PMMA loaded with 1 g antibiotics were tested for elution characteristics, antibacterial activities, and compressive strength in vitro. RESULTS: The ALBC containing gentamicin provided a much longer duration of antibiotic release than those containing other antibiotic. Imipenem-loading on the cement had a significant adverse effect on the compressive strength of the ALBC, which made it insufficient for use in prosthesis fixation. All of the tested antibiotics maintained their antibacterial properties after being mixed with PMMA. The gentamicin-loaded ALBC provided a broad antibacterial spectrum against all the test organisms and had the greatest duration of antibacterial activity against MSSA, CoNS, P. aeruginosa and E. coli. CONCLUSION: When considering the use of ALBC as infection prophylaxis in TJA, gentamicin-loaded ALBC may be a very effective choice. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:220–6. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2013-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3809714/ /pubmed/24128666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.210.2000188 Text en ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2013 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Chang, Y.
Tai, C-L.
Hsieh, P-H.
Ueng, S. W. N.
Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title_full Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title_fullStr Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title_short Gentamicin in bone cement: A potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
title_sort gentamicin in bone cement: a potentially more effective prophylactic measure of infection in joint arthroplasty
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24128666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.210.2000188
work_keys_str_mv AT changy gentamicininbonecementapotentiallymoreeffectiveprophylacticmeasureofinfectioninjointarthroplasty
AT taicl gentamicininbonecementapotentiallymoreeffectiveprophylacticmeasureofinfectioninjointarthroplasty
AT hsiehph gentamicininbonecementapotentiallymoreeffectiveprophylacticmeasureofinfectioninjointarthroplasty
AT uengswn gentamicininbonecementapotentiallymoreeffectiveprophylacticmeasureofinfectioninjointarthroplasty