Direct Contra Naïve-Indirect Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates between High-Viscosity GIC and Conventional Amalgam Restorations: An Empirical Study

BACKGROUND: Naïve-indirect comparisons are comparisons between competing clinical interventions’ evidence from separate (uncontrolled) trials. Direct comparisons are comparisons within randomised control trials (RCTs). The objective of this empirical study is to test the null-hypothesis that trends...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mickenautsch, Steffen, Yengopal, Veerasamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078397

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078397

Ejemplares similares