Cargando…
Direct Contra Naïve-Indirect Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates between High-Viscosity GIC and Conventional Amalgam Restorations: An Empirical Study
BACKGROUND: Naïve-indirect comparisons are comparisons between competing clinical interventions’ evidence from separate (uncontrolled) trials. Direct comparisons are comparisons within randomised control trials (RCTs). The objective of this empirical study is to test the null-hypothesis that trends...
Autores principales: | Mickenautsch, Steffen, Yengopal, Veerasamy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078397 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Failure Rate of Direct High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Versus Hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Posterior Permanent Teeth - a Systematic Review
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Caries-Preventive Effect of High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Allocation concealment appraisal of clinical therapy trials using the extended Composite Quality Score (CQS-2)—An empirically based update
por: Mickenautsch, Steffen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)