Cargando…

Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects

Purpose. Kidneys from DCD donors represent a significant pool, but preservation problems exist. The study objective was to test the importance of machine type for hypothermic preservation of DCD kidneys. Methods. Adult Beagle dog kidneys underwent 45 minutes of warm in situ ischemia followed by hypo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindell, Susanne L., Muir, Heather, Brassil, John, Mangino, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24222842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/802618
_version_ 1782288787065274368
author Lindell, Susanne L.
Muir, Heather
Brassil, John
Mangino, Martin J.
author_facet Lindell, Susanne L.
Muir, Heather
Brassil, John
Mangino, Martin J.
author_sort Lindell, Susanne L.
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Kidneys from DCD donors represent a significant pool, but preservation problems exist. The study objective was to test the importance of machine type for hypothermic preservation of DCD kidneys. Methods. Adult Beagle dog kidneys underwent 45 minutes of warm in situ ischemia followed by hypothermic perfusion for 24 hours (Belzer-MPS Solution) on either an ORS LifePort or a Waters RM3 using standard perfusion protocols. Kidneys were then autotransplanted, and renal function was assessed over 7 days following contralateral nephrectomy. Results. Renal vascular resistance was not different between the two pumps. After 24 hours, the oxygen partial pressure and oxygen delivery in the LifePort perfusate were significantly lower than those in the RM3 but not low enough to change lactate production. TheLifePort ran significantly colder than RM3 (2° versus 5°C). The arterial pressure waveform of the RM3 was qualitatively different from the waveform of the LifePort. Preservation injury after transplantation was not different between the devices. When the LifePort was changed to nonpulsatile flow, kidneys displayed significantly greater preservation injury compared to RM3. Conclusions. Both LifePort and RM3 can be used for hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of DCD kidneys with equal outcomes as long as the duty cycle remains pulsatile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3810436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38104362013-11-11 Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects Lindell, Susanne L. Muir, Heather Brassil, John Mangino, Martin J. J Transplant Research Article Purpose. Kidneys from DCD donors represent a significant pool, but preservation problems exist. The study objective was to test the importance of machine type for hypothermic preservation of DCD kidneys. Methods. Adult Beagle dog kidneys underwent 45 minutes of warm in situ ischemia followed by hypothermic perfusion for 24 hours (Belzer-MPS Solution) on either an ORS LifePort or a Waters RM3 using standard perfusion protocols. Kidneys were then autotransplanted, and renal function was assessed over 7 days following contralateral nephrectomy. Results. Renal vascular resistance was not different between the two pumps. After 24 hours, the oxygen partial pressure and oxygen delivery in the LifePort perfusate were significantly lower than those in the RM3 but not low enough to change lactate production. TheLifePort ran significantly colder than RM3 (2° versus 5°C). The arterial pressure waveform of the RM3 was qualitatively different from the waveform of the LifePort. Preservation injury after transplantation was not different between the devices. When the LifePort was changed to nonpulsatile flow, kidneys displayed significantly greater preservation injury compared to RM3. Conclusions. Both LifePort and RM3 can be used for hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of DCD kidneys with equal outcomes as long as the duty cycle remains pulsatile. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3810436/ /pubmed/24222842 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/802618 Text en Copyright © 2013 Susanne L. Lindell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lindell, Susanne L.
Muir, Heather
Brassil, John
Mangino, Martin J.
Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title_full Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title_fullStr Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title_full_unstemmed Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title_short Hypothermic Machine Perfusion Preservation of the DCD Kidney: Machine Effects
title_sort hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of the dcd kidney: machine effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24222842
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/802618
work_keys_str_mv AT lindellsusannel hypothermicmachineperfusionpreservationofthedcdkidneymachineeffects
AT muirheather hypothermicmachineperfusionpreservationofthedcdkidneymachineeffects
AT brassiljohn hypothermicmachineperfusionpreservationofthedcdkidneymachineeffects
AT manginomartinj hypothermicmachineperfusionpreservationofthedcdkidneymachineeffects