Cargando…

IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs

OBJECTIVES: Health informatics programs usually are evaluated by national accreditation committees. Not always are the members of these committees well informed about the international level of (education in) health informatics. Therefore, when a program is accredited by a national accreditation com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasman, Arie, Mantas, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24175114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.154
_version_ 1782288802833760256
author Hasman, Arie
Mantas, John
author_facet Hasman, Arie
Mantas, John
author_sort Hasman, Arie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Health informatics programs usually are evaluated by national accreditation committees. Not always are the members of these committees well informed about the international level of (education in) health informatics. Therefore, when a program is accredited by a national accreditation committee, this does not always mean that the program is of an international level. The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has expertise in the field of education. The IMIA Recommendations on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics guide curricula development. The goal of this article is to show that IMIA can also play the role of accreditation agency and to present the IMIA accreditation protocol and experiences obtained with it. METHODS: The accreditation procedure used in the Netherlands and Belgium was taken as a template for the design of the IMIA accreditation protocol. In a trial period of one and a half year the protocol is tested out on six health informatics programs. RESULTS: An accreditation protocol was designed. For judging the curriculum of a program the IMIA Recommendations are used. The institution has to write a self-assessment report and a site visit committee visits the program and judges its quality, supported by the self-assessment report and discussions with all stakeholders of the program. CONCLUSIONS: After having visited three programs it appears that the IMIA accreditation procedure works well. Only a few changes had to be introduced. Writing the self-assessment report already appears to be beneficial for the management of the program to obtain a better insight in the quality of their program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3810522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38105222013-10-30 IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs Hasman, Arie Mantas, John Healthc Inform Res Review Article OBJECTIVES: Health informatics programs usually are evaluated by national accreditation committees. Not always are the members of these committees well informed about the international level of (education in) health informatics. Therefore, when a program is accredited by a national accreditation committee, this does not always mean that the program is of an international level. The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has expertise in the field of education. The IMIA Recommendations on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics guide curricula development. The goal of this article is to show that IMIA can also play the role of accreditation agency and to present the IMIA accreditation protocol and experiences obtained with it. METHODS: The accreditation procedure used in the Netherlands and Belgium was taken as a template for the design of the IMIA accreditation protocol. In a trial period of one and a half year the protocol is tested out on six health informatics programs. RESULTS: An accreditation protocol was designed. For judging the curriculum of a program the IMIA Recommendations are used. The institution has to write a self-assessment report and a site visit committee visits the program and judges its quality, supported by the self-assessment report and discussions with all stakeholders of the program. CONCLUSIONS: After having visited three programs it appears that the IMIA accreditation procedure works well. Only a few changes had to be introduced. Writing the self-assessment report already appears to be beneficial for the management of the program to obtain a better insight in the quality of their program. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2013-09 2013-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3810522/ /pubmed/24175114 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.154 Text en © 2013 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hasman, Arie
Mantas, John
IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title_full IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title_fullStr IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title_full_unstemmed IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title_short IMIA Accreditation of Health Informatics Programs
title_sort imia accreditation of health informatics programs
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3810522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24175114
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.154
work_keys_str_mv AT hasmanarie imiaaccreditationofhealthinformaticsprograms
AT mantasjohn imiaaccreditationofhealthinformaticsprograms