Cargando…
Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis
Objective To estimate the frequency with which results of large randomized clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov are not available to the public. Design Cross sectional analysis Setting Trials with at least 500 participants that were prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and...
Autores principales: | Jones, Christopher W, Handler, Lara, Crowell, Karen E, Keil, Lukas G, Weaver, Mark A, Platts-Mills, Timothy F |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3812466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24169943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6104 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
por: Jones, Christopher W., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Characteristics of COVID-19 clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: cross-sectional analysis
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Citation bias favoring positive clinical trials of thrombolytics for acute ischemic stroke: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Misemer, Benjamin S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)