Cargando…

In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms

The cytotoxicity of the biomaterials is a key issue that should be addressed prior to pre-clinical applications. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the cytotoxixity of two forms of bioactive glasses:nanopowder and micropowder. Human HGF1-PI53 gingival fibroblast cells were used to evalu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rismanchian, Mansour, Khodaeian, Niloufar, Bahramian, Lida, Fathi, Mohammadhosein, Sadeghi-Aliabadi, Hojjat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250650
_version_ 1782289086282727424
author Rismanchian, Mansour
Khodaeian, Niloufar
Bahramian, Lida
Fathi, Mohammadhosein
Sadeghi-Aliabadi, Hojjat
author_facet Rismanchian, Mansour
Khodaeian, Niloufar
Bahramian, Lida
Fathi, Mohammadhosein
Sadeghi-Aliabadi, Hojjat
author_sort Rismanchian, Mansour
collection PubMed
description The cytotoxicity of the biomaterials is a key issue that should be addressed prior to pre-clinical applications. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the cytotoxixity of two forms of bioactive glasses:nanopowder and micropowder. Human HGF1-PI53 gingival fibroblast cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/ mL concentrations of the two bioactive glasses via MTT assay. The results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results showed that two bioactive glasses had statistically significant differences at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/mL concentrations (p-value < 0.05) and there was no correlation between time and cell cytotoxicity of bioactive glasses (p-value > 0.05), using t-test and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. We conclude that that cytotoxicity of nanopowder bioactive glass at concentrations ≤ 2 mg/mL was similar to micropowder bioactive glass at 24 and 48 h, however, it is more cytotoxic at concentrations ≥ 5 mg/mL in the first 48 h of applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3813266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38132662013-11-18 In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms Rismanchian, Mansour Khodaeian, Niloufar Bahramian, Lida Fathi, Mohammadhosein Sadeghi-Aliabadi, Hojjat Iran J Pharm Res Original Article The cytotoxicity of the biomaterials is a key issue that should be addressed prior to pre-clinical applications. This study was designed to evaluate and compare the cytotoxixity of two forms of bioactive glasses:nanopowder and micropowder. Human HGF1-PI53 gingival fibroblast cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/ mL concentrations of the two bioactive glasses via MTT assay. The results were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results showed that two bioactive glasses had statistically significant differences at 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg/mL concentrations (p-value < 0.05) and there was no correlation between time and cell cytotoxicity of bioactive glasses (p-value > 0.05), using t-test and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. We conclude that that cytotoxicity of nanopowder bioactive glass at concentrations ≤ 2 mg/mL was similar to micropowder bioactive glass at 24 and 48 h, however, it is more cytotoxic at concentrations ≥ 5 mg/mL in the first 48 h of applications. Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3813266/ /pubmed/24250650 Text en © 2012 by School of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
spellingShingle Original Article
Rismanchian, Mansour
Khodaeian, Niloufar
Bahramian, Lida
Fathi, Mohammadhosein
Sadeghi-Aliabadi, Hojjat
In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title_full In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title_fullStr In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title_full_unstemmed In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title_short In-vitro Comparison of Cytotoxicity of Two Bioactive Glasses in Micropowder and Nanopowder forms
title_sort in-vitro comparison of cytotoxicity of two bioactive glasses in micropowder and nanopowder forms
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250650
work_keys_str_mv AT rismanchianmansour invitrocomparisonofcytotoxicityoftwobioactiveglassesinmicropowderandnanopowderforms
AT khodaeianniloufar invitrocomparisonofcytotoxicityoftwobioactiveglassesinmicropowderandnanopowderforms
AT bahramianlida invitrocomparisonofcytotoxicityoftwobioactiveglassesinmicropowderandnanopowderforms
AT fathimohammadhosein invitrocomparisonofcytotoxicityoftwobioactiveglassesinmicropowderandnanopowderforms
AT sadeghialiabadihojjat invitrocomparisonofcytotoxicityoftwobioactiveglassesinmicropowderandnanopowderforms