Cargando…

Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing

PURPOSE: Dried amniotic membrane (AM) can be a useful therapeutic adjunct in ophthalmic surgery and possesses logistical advantages over cryopreserved AM. Differences in preservation techniques can significantly influence the biochemical composition and physical properties of AM, potentially affecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Claire L., Clare, Gerry, Stewart, Elizabeth A., Branch, Matthew J., McIntosh, Owen D., Dadhwal, Megha, Dua, Harminder S., Hopkinson, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078441
_version_ 1782289127251640320
author Allen, Claire L.
Clare, Gerry
Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Branch, Matthew J.
McIntosh, Owen D.
Dadhwal, Megha
Dua, Harminder S.
Hopkinson, Andrew
author_facet Allen, Claire L.
Clare, Gerry
Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Branch, Matthew J.
McIntosh, Owen D.
Dadhwal, Megha
Dua, Harminder S.
Hopkinson, Andrew
author_sort Allen, Claire L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Dried amniotic membrane (AM) can be a useful therapeutic adjunct in ophthalmic surgery and possesses logistical advantages over cryopreserved AM. Differences in preservation techniques can significantly influence the biochemical composition and physical properties of AM, potentially affecting clinical efficacy. This study was established to investigate the biochemical and structural effects of drying AM in the absence and presence of saccharide lyoprotectants and its biocompatibility compared to cryopreserved material. METHODS: AM was cryopreserved or dried with and without pre-treatment with trehalose or raffinose and the antioxidant epigallocatechin (EGCG). Structural and visual comparisons were assessed using electron microscopy. Localisation, expression and release of AM biological factors were determined using immunoassays and immunofluorescence. The biocompatibility of the AM preparations co-cultured with corneal epithelial cell (CEC) or keratocyte monolayers were assessed using cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and migration assays. RESULTS: Drying devitalised AM epithelium, but less than cryopreservation and cellular damage was reduced in dried AM pre-treated with trehalose or raffinose. Dried AM alone, and with trehalose or raffinose showed greater factor retention efficiencies and bioavailability compared to cryopreserved AM and demonstrated a more sustained biochemical factor time release in vitro. Cellular health assays showed that dried AM with trehalose or raffinose are compatible and superior substrates compared to cryopreserved AM for primary CEC expansion, with increased proliferation and reduced LDH and caspase-3 levels. This concept was supported by improved wound healing in an immortalised human CEC line (hiCEC) co-cultured with dried and trehalose or raffinose membranes, compared to cryopreserved and fresh AM. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified preservation process and our resultant optimised dried AM has enhanced structural properties and biochemical stability and is a superior substrate to conventional cryopreserved AM. In addition this product is stable and easily transportable allowing it to be globally wide reaching for use in clinical and military sectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3813584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38135842013-11-07 Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing Allen, Claire L. Clare, Gerry Stewart, Elizabeth A. Branch, Matthew J. McIntosh, Owen D. Dadhwal, Megha Dua, Harminder S. Hopkinson, Andrew PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Dried amniotic membrane (AM) can be a useful therapeutic adjunct in ophthalmic surgery and possesses logistical advantages over cryopreserved AM. Differences in preservation techniques can significantly influence the biochemical composition and physical properties of AM, potentially affecting clinical efficacy. This study was established to investigate the biochemical and structural effects of drying AM in the absence and presence of saccharide lyoprotectants and its biocompatibility compared to cryopreserved material. METHODS: AM was cryopreserved or dried with and without pre-treatment with trehalose or raffinose and the antioxidant epigallocatechin (EGCG). Structural and visual comparisons were assessed using electron microscopy. Localisation, expression and release of AM biological factors were determined using immunoassays and immunofluorescence. The biocompatibility of the AM preparations co-cultured with corneal epithelial cell (CEC) or keratocyte monolayers were assessed using cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, apoptosis and migration assays. RESULTS: Drying devitalised AM epithelium, but less than cryopreservation and cellular damage was reduced in dried AM pre-treated with trehalose or raffinose. Dried AM alone, and with trehalose or raffinose showed greater factor retention efficiencies and bioavailability compared to cryopreserved AM and demonstrated a more sustained biochemical factor time release in vitro. Cellular health assays showed that dried AM with trehalose or raffinose are compatible and superior substrates compared to cryopreserved AM for primary CEC expansion, with increased proliferation and reduced LDH and caspase-3 levels. This concept was supported by improved wound healing in an immortalised human CEC line (hiCEC) co-cultured with dried and trehalose or raffinose membranes, compared to cryopreserved and fresh AM. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified preservation process and our resultant optimised dried AM has enhanced structural properties and biochemical stability and is a superior substrate to conventional cryopreserved AM. In addition this product is stable and easily transportable allowing it to be globally wide reaching for use in clinical and military sectors. Public Library of Science 2013-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3813584/ /pubmed/24205233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078441 Text en © 2013 Allen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Allen, Claire L.
Clare, Gerry
Stewart, Elizabeth A.
Branch, Matthew J.
McIntosh, Owen D.
Dadhwal, Megha
Dua, Harminder S.
Hopkinson, Andrew
Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title_full Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title_fullStr Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title_full_unstemmed Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title_short Augmented Dried versus Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane as an Ocular Surface Dressing
title_sort augmented dried versus cryopreserved amniotic membrane as an ocular surface dressing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3813584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078441
work_keys_str_mv AT allenclairel augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT claregerry augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT stewartelizabetha augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT branchmatthewj augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT mcintoshowend augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT dadhwalmegha augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT duaharminders augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing
AT hopkinsonandrew augmenteddriedversuscryopreservedamnioticmembraneasanocularsurfacedressing