Cargando…

Evaluation of primary androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients using the J-CAPRA risk score

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) and non-MAB hormonal therapy with an luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analog on overall survival of prostate cancer patients in the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J-CaP) registry according to risk, as assessed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akaza, Hideyuki, Hinotsu, Shiro, Usami, Michiyuki, Ogawa, Osamu, Kitamura, Tadaichi, Suzuki, Kazuhiro, Tsukamoto, Taiji, Naito, Seiji, Namiki, Mikio, Hirao, Yoshihiko, Murai, Masaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223407
http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.12016
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine the influence of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) and non-MAB hormonal therapy with an luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analog on overall survival of prostate cancer patients in the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J-CaP) registry according to risk, as assessed using the novel J-CAPRA risk instrument. To undertake a multivariate analysis combining J-CAPRA risk score, type of hormonal therapy and comorbidities, in order to assess their impact on overall survival. METHODS: The J-CaP database includes men in Japan diagnosed with any stage of prostate cancer between 2001 and 2003 and treated with primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT), as monotherapy or in combination. A total of 26,272 men were enrolled and of these 19,265 were treated with PADT. This analysis was undertaken using the latest data set (30 April, 2010) including a total of 15,727 patients who received PADT and had follow-up data for periods ranging from 0 to 9.2 years. RESULTS: MAB for prostate cancer patients with intermediate- or high-risk disease has a significant benefit in terms of overall survival compared with LHRH analog monotherapy or surgical castration alone. Better results may be achieved in older (≥75 years) patients. Patient comorbidities are an important factor in determining overall survival, notably in older patients, and should be considered when selecting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on large-scale registry data, this report is the first to analyze the outcomes of MAB therapy in patients with prostate cancer at a wide range of disease stages. MAB therapy may provide significant survival benefits in intermediate- and high-risk patients.