Cargando…

The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Eun-Ha, Lim, Seok Tae, Han, Yeon-Hee, Jeong, Young Jin, Kang, Yun-Hee, Jeong, Hwan-Jeong, Sohn, Myung-Hee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294185
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031
_version_ 1782289228663619584
author Moon, Eun-Ha
Lim, Seok Tae
Han, Yeon-Hee
Jeong, Young Jin
Kang, Yun-Hee
Jeong, Hwan-Jeong
Sohn, Myung-Hee
author_facet Moon, Eun-Ha
Lim, Seok Tae
Han, Yeon-Hee
Jeong, Young Jin
Kang, Yun-Hee
Jeong, Hwan-Jeong
Sohn, Myung-Hee
author_sort Moon, Eun-Ha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women (52.0 ± 12.0 years) with breast cancer who underwent supine-PET/CT, mammo-PET/CT, and MR-mammography from April 2009 to August 2009 were enrolled in the study. We compared the size of the tumour, tumour to chest wall distance, tumour to skin distance, volume of axillary fossa, and number of meta-static axillary lymph nodes between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT. Next, we assessed the difference of focality of primary breast tumour and tumour size in mammo-PET/CT and MR-mammography. Histopathologic findings served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: In the comparison between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT, significant differences were found in the tumour size (supine-PET/CT: 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, mammo-PET/CT: 1.5 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001), tumour to thoracic wall distance (1.8 ± 0.9 cm, 2.2 ± 2.1 cm, p < 0.001), and tumour to skin distance (1.5 ± 0.8 cm, 2.1 ± 1.4 cm, p < 0.001). The volume of axillary fossa was significantly wider in mammo-PET/CT than supine-PET/CT (21.7 ± 8.7 cm(3) vs. 23.4 ± 10.4 cm(3), p = 0.03). Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage of the primary tumour than did supine-PET/CT (72.5% vs. 67.5%). No significant difference was found in the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Compared with MR-mammography, mammo-PET/CT provided more correct classification of the focality of lesion than did MR-mammography (95% vs. 90%). In the T-stage, 72.5% of cases with mammo-PET/CT and 70% of cases with MR-mammography showed correspondence with pathologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage and evaluation of axillary fossa may also be delineated more clearly than with supine-PET/CT. The initial assessment of mammo-PET/CT would be more useful than MR-mammography because the mammo-PET/CT indicates similar accuracy with MR-mammography for decision of T-stage of primary breast tumour and more correct than MR-mammography for defining focality of lesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38142852013-12-01 The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography Moon, Eun-Ha Lim, Seok Tae Han, Yeon-Hee Jeong, Young Jin Kang, Yun-Hee Jeong, Hwan-Jeong Sohn, Myung-Hee Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women (52.0 ± 12.0 years) with breast cancer who underwent supine-PET/CT, mammo-PET/CT, and MR-mammography from April 2009 to August 2009 were enrolled in the study. We compared the size of the tumour, tumour to chest wall distance, tumour to skin distance, volume of axillary fossa, and number of meta-static axillary lymph nodes between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT. Next, we assessed the difference of focality of primary breast tumour and tumour size in mammo-PET/CT and MR-mammography. Histopathologic findings served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: In the comparison between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT, significant differences were found in the tumour size (supine-PET/CT: 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, mammo-PET/CT: 1.5 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001), tumour to thoracic wall distance (1.8 ± 0.9 cm, 2.2 ± 2.1 cm, p < 0.001), and tumour to skin distance (1.5 ± 0.8 cm, 2.1 ± 1.4 cm, p < 0.001). The volume of axillary fossa was significantly wider in mammo-PET/CT than supine-PET/CT (21.7 ± 8.7 cm(3) vs. 23.4 ± 10.4 cm(3), p = 0.03). Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage of the primary tumour than did supine-PET/CT (72.5% vs. 67.5%). No significant difference was found in the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Compared with MR-mammography, mammo-PET/CT provided more correct classification of the focality of lesion than did MR-mammography (95% vs. 90%). In the T-stage, 72.5% of cases with mammo-PET/CT and 70% of cases with MR-mammography showed correspondence with pathologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage and evaluation of axillary fossa may also be delineated more clearly than with supine-PET/CT. The initial assessment of mammo-PET/CT would be more useful than MR-mammography because the mammo-PET/CT indicates similar accuracy with MR-mammography for decision of T-stage of primary breast tumour and more correct than MR-mammography for defining focality of lesion. Versita, Warsaw 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3814285/ /pubmed/24294185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031 Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Moon, Eun-Ha
Lim, Seok Tae
Han, Yeon-Hee
Jeong, Young Jin
Kang, Yun-Hee
Jeong, Hwan-Jeong
Sohn, Myung-Hee
The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title_full The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title_fullStr The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title_full_unstemmed The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title_short The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
title_sort usefulness of f-18 fdg pet/ct-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional pet/ct and mr-mammography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294185
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031
work_keys_str_mv AT mooneunha theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT limseoktae theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT hanyeonhee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT jeongyoungjin theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT kangyunhee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT jeonghwanjeong theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT sohnmyunghee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT mooneunha usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT limseoktae usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT hanyeonhee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT jeongyoungjin usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT kangyunhee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT jeonghwanjeong usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography
AT sohnmyunghee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography