Cargando…
The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography
BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Versita, Warsaw
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031 |
_version_ | 1782289228663619584 |
---|---|
author | Moon, Eun-Ha Lim, Seok Tae Han, Yeon-Hee Jeong, Young Jin Kang, Yun-Hee Jeong, Hwan-Jeong Sohn, Myung-Hee |
author_facet | Moon, Eun-Ha Lim, Seok Tae Han, Yeon-Hee Jeong, Young Jin Kang, Yun-Hee Jeong, Hwan-Jeong Sohn, Myung-Hee |
author_sort | Moon, Eun-Ha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women (52.0 ± 12.0 years) with breast cancer who underwent supine-PET/CT, mammo-PET/CT, and MR-mammography from April 2009 to August 2009 were enrolled in the study. We compared the size of the tumour, tumour to chest wall distance, tumour to skin distance, volume of axillary fossa, and number of meta-static axillary lymph nodes between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT. Next, we assessed the difference of focality of primary breast tumour and tumour size in mammo-PET/CT and MR-mammography. Histopathologic findings served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: In the comparison between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT, significant differences were found in the tumour size (supine-PET/CT: 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, mammo-PET/CT: 1.5 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001), tumour to thoracic wall distance (1.8 ± 0.9 cm, 2.2 ± 2.1 cm, p < 0.001), and tumour to skin distance (1.5 ± 0.8 cm, 2.1 ± 1.4 cm, p < 0.001). The volume of axillary fossa was significantly wider in mammo-PET/CT than supine-PET/CT (21.7 ± 8.7 cm(3) vs. 23.4 ± 10.4 cm(3), p = 0.03). Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage of the primary tumour than did supine-PET/CT (72.5% vs. 67.5%). No significant difference was found in the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Compared with MR-mammography, mammo-PET/CT provided more correct classification of the focality of lesion than did MR-mammography (95% vs. 90%). In the T-stage, 72.5% of cases with mammo-PET/CT and 70% of cases with MR-mammography showed correspondence with pathologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage and evaluation of axillary fossa may also be delineated more clearly than with supine-PET/CT. The initial assessment of mammo-PET/CT would be more useful than MR-mammography because the mammo-PET/CT indicates similar accuracy with MR-mammography for decision of T-stage of primary breast tumour and more correct than MR-mammography for defining focality of lesion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3814285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Versita, Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38142852013-12-01 The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography Moon, Eun-Ha Lim, Seok Tae Han, Yeon-Hee Jeong, Young Jin Kang, Yun-Hee Jeong, Hwan-Jeong Sohn, Myung-Hee Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of an integrated Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) PET/CT-mammography (mammo-PET/CT) with conventional torso PET/CT (supine-PET/CT) and MR-mammography for initial assessment of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women (52.0 ± 12.0 years) with breast cancer who underwent supine-PET/CT, mammo-PET/CT, and MR-mammography from April 2009 to August 2009 were enrolled in the study. We compared the size of the tumour, tumour to chest wall distance, tumour to skin distance, volume of axillary fossa, and number of meta-static axillary lymph nodes between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT. Next, we assessed the difference of focality of primary breast tumour and tumour size in mammo-PET/CT and MR-mammography. Histopathologic findings served as the standard of reference. RESULTS: In the comparison between supine-PET/CT and mammo-PET/CT, significant differences were found in the tumour size (supine-PET/CT: 1.3 ± 0.6 cm, mammo-PET/CT: 1.5 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001), tumour to thoracic wall distance (1.8 ± 0.9 cm, 2.2 ± 2.1 cm, p < 0.001), and tumour to skin distance (1.5 ± 0.8 cm, 2.1 ± 1.4 cm, p < 0.001). The volume of axillary fossa was significantly wider in mammo-PET/CT than supine-PET/CT (21.7 ± 8.7 cm(3) vs. 23.4 ± 10.4 cm(3), p = 0.03). Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage of the primary tumour than did supine-PET/CT (72.5% vs. 67.5%). No significant difference was found in the number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Compared with MR-mammography, mammo-PET/CT provided more correct classification of the focality of lesion than did MR-mammography (95% vs. 90%). In the T-stage, 72.5% of cases with mammo-PET/CT and 70% of cases with MR-mammography showed correspondence with pathologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Mammo-PET/CT provided more correct definition of the T-stage and evaluation of axillary fossa may also be delineated more clearly than with supine-PET/CT. The initial assessment of mammo-PET/CT would be more useful than MR-mammography because the mammo-PET/CT indicates similar accuracy with MR-mammography for decision of T-stage of primary breast tumour and more correct than MR-mammography for defining focality of lesion. Versita, Warsaw 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3814285/ /pubmed/24294185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031 Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moon, Eun-Ha Lim, Seok Tae Han, Yeon-Hee Jeong, Young Jin Kang, Yun-Hee Jeong, Hwan-Jeong Sohn, Myung-Hee The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title | The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title_full | The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title_fullStr | The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title_full_unstemmed | The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title_short | The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography |
title_sort | usefulness of f-18 fdg pet/ct-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional pet/ct and mr-mammography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294185 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooneunha theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT limseoktae theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT hanyeonhee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT jeongyoungjin theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT kangyunhee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT jeonghwanjeong theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT sohnmyunghee theusefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT mooneunha usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT limseoktae usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT hanyeonhee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT jeongyoungjin usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT kangyunhee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT jeonghwanjeong usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography AT sohnmyunghee usefulnessoff18fdgpetctmammographyforpreoperativestagingofbreastcancercomparisonwithconventionalpetctandmrmammography |