Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies

BACKGROUND: We conducted a dosimetric comparison of an ipsilateral beam arrangement for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with off-axis beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients who received post-operative radiotherapy (RT) for parotid malignancies were used in this dosimetric study. Four trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yirmibesoglu, Eda, Fried, David V., Kostich, Mark, Rosenman, Julian, Shockley, William, Weissler, Mark, Zanation, Adam, Chera, Bhishamjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Versita, Warsaw 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0010
_version_ 1782289229330513920
author Yirmibesoglu, Eda
Fried, David V.
Kostich, Mark
Rosenman, Julian
Shockley, William
Weissler, Mark
Zanation, Adam
Chera, Bhishamjit
author_facet Yirmibesoglu, Eda
Fried, David V.
Kostich, Mark
Rosenman, Julian
Shockley, William
Weissler, Mark
Zanation, Adam
Chera, Bhishamjit
author_sort Yirmibesoglu, Eda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We conducted a dosimetric comparison of an ipsilateral beam arrangement for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with off-axis beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients who received post-operative radiotherapy (RT) for parotid malignancies were used in this dosimetric study. Four treatment plans were created for each CT data set (24 plans): 1) ipsilateral 4-field off-axis IMRT (4fld-OA), 2) conventional wedge pair (WP), 3) 7 field co-planar IMRT (7fld), and 4) ipsilateral co-planar 4-field quartet IMRT (4fld-CP). Dose, volume statistics for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and planning risk volumes (PRVs) were compared for the four treatment techniques. RESULTS: Wedge pair plans inadequately covered the deep aspect of the PTV. The 7-field IMRT plans delivered the largest low dose volumes to normal tissues. Mean dose to the contralateral parotid was highest for 7 field IMRT. Mean dose to the contralateral submandibular gland was highest for 7 field IMRT and WP. 7 field IMRT plans had the highest dose to the oral cavity. The mean doses to the brainstem, spinal cord, ipsilateral temporal lobe, cerrebellum and ipsilateral cochlea were similar among the four techniques. CONCLUSIONS: For postoperative treatment of the parotid bed, 4-field ipsilateral IMRT techniques provided excellent coverage while maximally sparing the contralateral parotid gland and submandibular gland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Versita, Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38142882013-12-01 Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies Yirmibesoglu, Eda Fried, David V. Kostich, Mark Rosenman, Julian Shockley, William Weissler, Mark Zanation, Adam Chera, Bhishamjit Radiol Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: We conducted a dosimetric comparison of an ipsilateral beam arrangement for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with off-axis beams. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients who received post-operative radiotherapy (RT) for parotid malignancies were used in this dosimetric study. Four treatment plans were created for each CT data set (24 plans): 1) ipsilateral 4-field off-axis IMRT (4fld-OA), 2) conventional wedge pair (WP), 3) 7 field co-planar IMRT (7fld), and 4) ipsilateral co-planar 4-field quartet IMRT (4fld-CP). Dose, volume statistics for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and planning risk volumes (PRVs) were compared for the four treatment techniques. RESULTS: Wedge pair plans inadequately covered the deep aspect of the PTV. The 7-field IMRT plans delivered the largest low dose volumes to normal tissues. Mean dose to the contralateral parotid was highest for 7 field IMRT. Mean dose to the contralateral submandibular gland was highest for 7 field IMRT and WP. 7 field IMRT plans had the highest dose to the oral cavity. The mean doses to the brainstem, spinal cord, ipsilateral temporal lobe, cerrebellum and ipsilateral cochlea were similar among the four techniques. CONCLUSIONS: For postoperative treatment of the parotid bed, 4-field ipsilateral IMRT techniques provided excellent coverage while maximally sparing the contralateral parotid gland and submandibular gland. Versita, Warsaw 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3814288/ /pubmed/24294188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0010 Text en Copyright © by Association of Radiology & Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Yirmibesoglu, Eda
Fried, David V.
Kostich, Mark
Rosenman, Julian
Shockley, William
Weissler, Mark
Zanation, Adam
Chera, Bhishamjit
Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of an ipsilateral intensity modulated radiotherapy beam arrangement for parotid malignancies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24294188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2013-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT yirmibesoglueda dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT frieddavidv dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT kostichmark dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT rosenmanjulian dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT shockleywilliam dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT weisslermark dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT zanationadam dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies
AT cherabhishamjit dosimetricevaluationofanipsilateralintensitymodulatedradiotherapybeamarrangementforparotidmalignancies