Cargando…

Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study

Objective To model the overall and income specific effect of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks on the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the UK. Design Econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. Setting United Kingdom. Population Adults aged 16 and over. Intervention A 20% t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briggs, Adam D M, Mytton, Oliver T, Kehlbacher, Ariane, Tiffin, Richard, Rayner, Mike, Scarborough, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6189
_version_ 1782289252656087040
author Briggs, Adam D M
Mytton, Oliver T
Kehlbacher, Ariane
Tiffin, Richard
Rayner, Mike
Scarborough, Peter
author_facet Briggs, Adam D M
Mytton, Oliver T
Kehlbacher, Ariane
Tiffin, Richard
Rayner, Mike
Scarborough, Peter
author_sort Briggs, Adam D M
collection PubMed
description Objective To model the overall and income specific effect of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks on the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the UK. Design Econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. Setting United Kingdom. Population Adults aged 16 and over. Intervention A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks. Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were the overall and income specific changes in the number and percentage of overweight (body mass index ≥25) and obese (≥30) adults in the UK following the implementation of the tax. Secondary outcomes were the effect by age group (16-29, 30-49, and ≥50 years) and by UK constituent country. The revenue generated from the tax and the income specific changes in weekly expenditure on drinks were also estimated. Results A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks was estimated to reduce the number of obese adults in the UK by 1.3% (95% credible interval 0.8% to 1.7%) or 180 000 (110 000 to 247 000) people and the number who are overweight by 0.9% (0.6% to 1.1%) or 285 000 (201 000 to 364 000) people. The predicted reductions in prevalence of obesity for income thirds 1 (lowest income), 2, and 3 (highest income) were 1.3% (0.3% to 2.0%), 0.9% (0.1% to 1.6%), and 2.1% (1.3% to 2.9%). The effect on obesity declined with age. Predicted annual revenue was £276m (£272m to £279m), with estimated increases in total expenditure on drinks for income thirds 1, 2, and 3 of 2.1% (1.4% to 3.0%), 1.7% (1.2% to 2.2%), and 0.8% (0.4% to 1.2%). Conclusions A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks would lead to a reduction in the prevalence of obesity in the UK of 1.3% (around 180 000 people). The greatest effects may occur in young people, with no significant differences between income groups. Both effects warrant further exploration. Taxation of sugar sweetened drinks is a promising population measure to target population obesity, particularly among younger adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38144052013-11-04 Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study Briggs, Adam D M Mytton, Oliver T Kehlbacher, Ariane Tiffin, Richard Rayner, Mike Scarborough, Peter BMJ Research Objective To model the overall and income specific effect of a 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks on the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the UK. Design Econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. Setting United Kingdom. Population Adults aged 16 and over. Intervention A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks. Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were the overall and income specific changes in the number and percentage of overweight (body mass index ≥25) and obese (≥30) adults in the UK following the implementation of the tax. Secondary outcomes were the effect by age group (16-29, 30-49, and ≥50 years) and by UK constituent country. The revenue generated from the tax and the income specific changes in weekly expenditure on drinks were also estimated. Results A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks was estimated to reduce the number of obese adults in the UK by 1.3% (95% credible interval 0.8% to 1.7%) or 180 000 (110 000 to 247 000) people and the number who are overweight by 0.9% (0.6% to 1.1%) or 285 000 (201 000 to 364 000) people. The predicted reductions in prevalence of obesity for income thirds 1 (lowest income), 2, and 3 (highest income) were 1.3% (0.3% to 2.0%), 0.9% (0.1% to 1.6%), and 2.1% (1.3% to 2.9%). The effect on obesity declined with age. Predicted annual revenue was £276m (£272m to £279m), with estimated increases in total expenditure on drinks for income thirds 1, 2, and 3 of 2.1% (1.4% to 3.0%), 1.7% (1.2% to 2.2%), and 0.8% (0.4% to 1.2%). Conclusions A 20% tax on sugar sweetened drinks would lead to a reduction in the prevalence of obesity in the UK of 1.3% (around 180 000 people). The greatest effects may occur in young people, with no significant differences between income groups. Both effects warrant further exploration. Taxation of sugar sweetened drinks is a promising population measure to target population obesity, particularly among younger adults. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3814405/ /pubmed/24179043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6189 Text en © Briggs et al 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Briggs, Adam D M
Mytton, Oliver T
Kehlbacher, Ariane
Tiffin, Richard
Rayner, Mike
Scarborough, Peter
Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title_full Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title_fullStr Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title_short Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in UK: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
title_sort overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in uk: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24179043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6189
work_keys_str_mv AT briggsadamdm overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy
AT myttonolivert overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy
AT kehlbacherariane overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy
AT tiffinrichard overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy
AT raynermike overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy
AT scarboroughpeter overallandincomespecificeffectonprevalenceofoverweightandobesityof20sugarsweeteneddrinktaxinukeconometricandcomparativeriskassessmentmodellingstudy