Cargando…
Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent chil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805 |
_version_ | 1782289257434447872 |
---|---|
author | Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. Soto-Alba, Elia E. Arias-Trejo, Natalia |
author_facet | Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. Soto-Alba, Elia E. Arias-Trejo, Natalia |
author_sort | Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent children from using perceptual cues by controlling the visual properties of the stimuli (e.g., density, contour length, and area); nevertheless, researchers have used these visual controls interchangeably. Studies have also tried to understand the relation between children's cardinality knowledge and their performance in a number comparison task; divergent results may in fact be rooted in the use of different visual controls. The main goal of the present study is to explore how the usage of different visual controls (density, total filled area, and correlated and anti-correlated area) affects children's performance in a number comparison task, and its relationship to children's cardinality knowledge. For that purpose, 77 preschoolers participated in three tasks: (1) counting list elicitation to test whether children could recite the counting list up to ten, (2) give a number to evaluate children's cardinality knowledge, and (3) number comparison to evaluate their ability to compare two quantities. During this last task, children were asked to point at the set with more geometric figures when two sets were displayed on a screen. Children were exposed only to one of the three visual controls. Results showed that overall, children performed above chance in the number comparison task; nonetheless, density was the easiest control, while correlated and anti-correlated area was the most difficult in most cases. Only total filled area was sensitive to discriminate cardinal principal knowers from non-cardinal principal knowers. How this finding helps to explain conflicting evidence from previous research, and how the present outcome relates to children's number word knowledge is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3814427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38144272013-11-06 Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. Soto-Alba, Elia E. Arias-Trejo, Natalia Front Psychol Psychology Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent children from using perceptual cues by controlling the visual properties of the stimuli (e.g., density, contour length, and area); nevertheless, researchers have used these visual controls interchangeably. Studies have also tried to understand the relation between children's cardinality knowledge and their performance in a number comparison task; divergent results may in fact be rooted in the use of different visual controls. The main goal of the present study is to explore how the usage of different visual controls (density, total filled area, and correlated and anti-correlated area) affects children's performance in a number comparison task, and its relationship to children's cardinality knowledge. For that purpose, 77 preschoolers participated in three tasks: (1) counting list elicitation to test whether children could recite the counting list up to ten, (2) give a number to evaluate children's cardinality knowledge, and (3) number comparison to evaluate their ability to compare two quantities. During this last task, children were asked to point at the set with more geometric figures when two sets were displayed on a screen. Children were exposed only to one of the three visual controls. Results showed that overall, children performed above chance in the number comparison task; nonetheless, density was the easiest control, while correlated and anti-correlated area was the most difficult in most cases. Only total filled area was sensitive to discriminate cardinal principal knowers from non-cardinal principal knowers. How this finding helps to explain conflicting evidence from previous research, and how the present outcome relates to children's number word knowledge is discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3814427/ /pubmed/24198803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805 Text en Copyright © 2013 Abreu-Mendoza, Soto-Alba and Arias-Trejo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. Soto-Alba, Elia E. Arias-Trejo, Natalia Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title | Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title_full | Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title_fullStr | Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title_short | Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
title_sort | area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abreumendozarobertoa areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison AT sotoalbaeliae areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison AT ariastrejonatalia areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison |