Cargando…

Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison

Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent chil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A., Soto-Alba, Elia E., Arias-Trejo, Natalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805
_version_ 1782289257434447872
author Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A.
Soto-Alba, Elia E.
Arias-Trejo, Natalia
author_facet Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A.
Soto-Alba, Elia E.
Arias-Trejo, Natalia
author_sort Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A.
collection PubMed
description Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent children from using perceptual cues by controlling the visual properties of the stimuli (e.g., density, contour length, and area); nevertheless, researchers have used these visual controls interchangeably. Studies have also tried to understand the relation between children's cardinality knowledge and their performance in a number comparison task; divergent results may in fact be rooted in the use of different visual controls. The main goal of the present study is to explore how the usage of different visual controls (density, total filled area, and correlated and anti-correlated area) affects children's performance in a number comparison task, and its relationship to children's cardinality knowledge. For that purpose, 77 preschoolers participated in three tasks: (1) counting list elicitation to test whether children could recite the counting list up to ten, (2) give a number to evaluate children's cardinality knowledge, and (3) number comparison to evaluate their ability to compare two quantities. During this last task, children were asked to point at the set with more geometric figures when two sets were displayed on a screen. Children were exposed only to one of the three visual controls. Results showed that overall, children performed above chance in the number comparison task; nonetheless, density was the easiest control, while correlated and anti-correlated area was the most difficult in most cases. Only total filled area was sensitive to discriminate cardinal principal knowers from non-cardinal principal knowers. How this finding helps to explain conflicting evidence from previous research, and how the present outcome relates to children's number word knowledge is discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38144272013-11-06 Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A. Soto-Alba, Elia E. Arias-Trejo, Natalia Front Psychol Psychology Current research in the number development field has focused in individual differences regarding the acuity of children's approximate number system (ANS). The most common task to evaluate children's acuity is through non-symbolic numerical comparison. Efforts have been made to prevent children from using perceptual cues by controlling the visual properties of the stimuli (e.g., density, contour length, and area); nevertheless, researchers have used these visual controls interchangeably. Studies have also tried to understand the relation between children's cardinality knowledge and their performance in a number comparison task; divergent results may in fact be rooted in the use of different visual controls. The main goal of the present study is to explore how the usage of different visual controls (density, total filled area, and correlated and anti-correlated area) affects children's performance in a number comparison task, and its relationship to children's cardinality knowledge. For that purpose, 77 preschoolers participated in three tasks: (1) counting list elicitation to test whether children could recite the counting list up to ten, (2) give a number to evaluate children's cardinality knowledge, and (3) number comparison to evaluate their ability to compare two quantities. During this last task, children were asked to point at the set with more geometric figures when two sets were displayed on a screen. Children were exposed only to one of the three visual controls. Results showed that overall, children performed above chance in the number comparison task; nonetheless, density was the easiest control, while correlated and anti-correlated area was the most difficult in most cases. Only total filled area was sensitive to discriminate cardinal principal knowers from non-cardinal principal knowers. How this finding helps to explain conflicting evidence from previous research, and how the present outcome relates to children's number word knowledge is discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3814427/ /pubmed/24198803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805 Text en Copyright © 2013 Abreu-Mendoza, Soto-Alba and Arias-Trejo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Abreu-Mendoza, Roberto A.
Soto-Alba, Elia E.
Arias-Trejo, Natalia
Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title_full Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title_fullStr Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title_full_unstemmed Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title_short Area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
title_sort area vs. density: influence of visual variables and cardinality knowledge in early number comparison
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00805
work_keys_str_mv AT abreumendozarobertoa areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison
AT sotoalbaeliae areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison
AT ariastrejonatalia areavsdensityinfluenceofvisualvariablesandcardinalityknowledgeinearlynumbercomparison