Cargando…

Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum

BACKGROUND: Caffeine which exists in drinks such as coffee as well as in drug dosage forms in the global market is among the materials that increase alertness and decrease fatigue. Compared to other forms of caffeine, caffeine gum can create faster and more prominent effects. In this study, the main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aslani, Abolfazl, Jalilian, Fatemeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223387
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.115806
_version_ 1782289288440840192
author Aslani, Abolfazl
Jalilian, Fatemeh
author_facet Aslani, Abolfazl
Jalilian, Fatemeh
author_sort Aslani, Abolfazl
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caffeine which exists in drinks such as coffee as well as in drug dosage forms in the global market is among the materials that increase alertness and decrease fatigue. Compared to other forms of caffeine, caffeine gum can create faster and more prominent effects. In this study, the main goal is to design a new formulation of caffeine gum with desirable taste and assess its physicochemical properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Caffeine gum was prepared by softening of gum bases and then mixing with other formulation ingredients. To decrease the bitterness of caffeine, sugar, aspartame, liquid glucose, sorbitol, manitol, xylitol, and various flavors were used. Caffeine release from gum base was investigated by mechanical chewing set. Content uniformity test was also performed on the gums. The gums were evaluated in terms of organoleptic properties by the Latin-Square design at different stages. RESULTS: After making 22 formulations of caffeine gums, F(11) from 20 mg caffeine gums and F(22) from 50 mg caffeine gums were chosen as the best formulation in organoleptic properties. Both types of gum released about 90% of their own drug content after 30 min. Drug content of 20 and 50 mg caffeine gum was about 18.2-21.3 mg and 45.7-53.6 mg respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, 20 and 50 mg caffeine gums with suitable and desirable properties (i.e., good taste and satisfactory release) were formulated. The best flavor for caffeine gum was cinnamon. Both kinds of 20 and 50 mg gums succeeded in content uniformity test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38146502013-11-12 Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum Aslani, Abolfazl Jalilian, Fatemeh Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Caffeine which exists in drinks such as coffee as well as in drug dosage forms in the global market is among the materials that increase alertness and decrease fatigue. Compared to other forms of caffeine, caffeine gum can create faster and more prominent effects. In this study, the main goal is to design a new formulation of caffeine gum with desirable taste and assess its physicochemical properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Caffeine gum was prepared by softening of gum bases and then mixing with other formulation ingredients. To decrease the bitterness of caffeine, sugar, aspartame, liquid glucose, sorbitol, manitol, xylitol, and various flavors were used. Caffeine release from gum base was investigated by mechanical chewing set. Content uniformity test was also performed on the gums. The gums were evaluated in terms of organoleptic properties by the Latin-Square design at different stages. RESULTS: After making 22 formulations of caffeine gums, F(11) from 20 mg caffeine gums and F(22) from 50 mg caffeine gums were chosen as the best formulation in organoleptic properties. Both types of gum released about 90% of their own drug content after 30 min. Drug content of 20 and 50 mg caffeine gum was about 18.2-21.3 mg and 45.7-53.6 mg respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, 20 and 50 mg caffeine gums with suitable and desirable properties (i.e., good taste and satisfactory release) were formulated. The best flavor for caffeine gum was cinnamon. Both kinds of 20 and 50 mg gums succeeded in content uniformity test. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3814650/ /pubmed/24223387 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.115806 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Aslani http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aslani, Abolfazl
Jalilian, Fatemeh
Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title_full Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title_fullStr Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title_full_unstemmed Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title_short Design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
title_sort design, formulation and evaluation of caffeine chewing gum
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223387
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.115806
work_keys_str_mv AT aslaniabolfazl designformulationandevaluationofcaffeinechewinggum
AT jalilianfatemeh designformulationandevaluationofcaffeinechewinggum