Cargando…
Conventional 2.0 mm miniplates versus 3-D plates in mandibular fractures
AIM: To compare and evaluate the treatment outcome and postoperative complications in mandibular fractures using 2- and 3-dimensional miniplates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of a sample of 28 patients (40 fracture sites) divided randomly but equally (single-blind control trial study)...
Autores principales: | Sadhwani, Bipin S., Anchlia, Sonal |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205475 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.119231 |
Ejemplares similares
-
2 mm Conventional Miniplates with Three-Dimensional Strut Plate in Mandibular Fractures
por: Kaushik, Shishir, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Comparative Evaluation of 2.0mm Two-Dimensional Miniplates Versus 2.0mm Three-Dimensional Miniplates in Mandibular Fractures
por: Sarepally, Godvine, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Efficacy of Microplates versus Miniplates in the Management of Maxillofacial Fractures
por: Mittal, Gaurav, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Three-dimensional Locking Plate and Conventional Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Anterior Fractures
por: Budhraja, Nilima J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Six-hole versus Four-hole Miniplates in Isolated, Unilateral Angle Fracture of the Mandible
por: Kumar, A. Senthil, et al.
Publicado: (2020)