Cargando…
Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402 |
_version_ | 1782289335512465408 |
---|---|
author | McCreesh, Nicky Copas, Andrew Seeley, Janet Johnston, Lisa G. Sonnenberg, Pam Hayes, Richard J. Frost, Simon D. W. White, Richard G. |
author_facet | McCreesh, Nicky Copas, Andrew Seeley, Janet Johnston, Lisa G. Sonnenberg, Pam Hayes, Richard J. Frost, Simon D. W. White, Richard G. |
author_sort | McCreesh, Nicky |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimates if coupons are distributed non-randomly or if potential recruits present for interview non-randomly. We explore if biases detected in an RDS study were due to either of these mechanisms, and propose and apply weights to reduce bias due to non-random presentation for interview. METHODS: Using data from the total population, and the population to whom recruiters offered their coupons, we explored how age and socioeconomic status were associated with being offered a coupon, and, if offered a coupon, with presenting for interview. Population proportions were estimated by weighting by the assumed inverse probabilities of being offered a coupon (as in existing RDS methods), and also of presentation for interview if offered a coupon by age and socioeconomic status group. RESULTS: Younger men were under-recruited primarily because they were less likely to be offered coupons. The under-recruitment of higher socioeconomic status men was due in part to them being less likely to present for interview. Consistent with these findings, weighting for non-random presentation for interview by age and socioeconomic status group greatly improved the estimate of the proportion of men in the lowest socioeconomic group, reducing the root-mean-squared error of RDS estimates of socioeconomic status by 38%, but had little effect on estimates for age. The weighting also improved estimates for tribe and religion (reducing root-mean-squared-errors by 19–29%), but had little effect for sexual activity or HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from recruiters on the characteristics of men to whom they offered coupons may be used to reduce bias in RDS studies. Further evaluation of this new method is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3814964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38149642013-11-07 Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation McCreesh, Nicky Copas, Andrew Seeley, Janet Johnston, Lisa G. Sonnenberg, Pam Hayes, Richard J. Frost, Simon D. W. White, Richard G. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimates if coupons are distributed non-randomly or if potential recruits present for interview non-randomly. We explore if biases detected in an RDS study were due to either of these mechanisms, and propose and apply weights to reduce bias due to non-random presentation for interview. METHODS: Using data from the total population, and the population to whom recruiters offered their coupons, we explored how age and socioeconomic status were associated with being offered a coupon, and, if offered a coupon, with presenting for interview. Population proportions were estimated by weighting by the assumed inverse probabilities of being offered a coupon (as in existing RDS methods), and also of presentation for interview if offered a coupon by age and socioeconomic status group. RESULTS: Younger men were under-recruited primarily because they were less likely to be offered coupons. The under-recruitment of higher socioeconomic status men was due in part to them being less likely to present for interview. Consistent with these findings, weighting for non-random presentation for interview by age and socioeconomic status group greatly improved the estimate of the proportion of men in the lowest socioeconomic group, reducing the root-mean-squared error of RDS estimates of socioeconomic status by 38%, but had little effect on estimates for age. The weighting also improved estimates for tribe and religion (reducing root-mean-squared-errors by 19–29%), but had little effect for sexual activity or HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from recruiters on the characteristics of men to whom they offered coupons may be used to reduce bias in RDS studies. Further evaluation of this new method is required. Public Library of Science 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3814964/ /pubmed/24205221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402 Text en © 2013 McCreesh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McCreesh, Nicky Copas, Andrew Seeley, Janet Johnston, Lisa G. Sonnenberg, Pam Hayes, Richard J. Frost, Simon D. W. White, Richard G. Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title | Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title_full | Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title_fullStr | Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title_full_unstemmed | Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title_short | Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation |
title_sort | respondent driven sampling: determinants of recruitment and a method to improve point estimation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccreeshnicky respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT copasandrew respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT seeleyjanet respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT johnstonlisag respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT sonnenbergpam respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT hayesrichardj respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT frostsimondw respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation AT whiterichardg respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation |