Cargando…

Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation

INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCreesh, Nicky, Copas, Andrew, Seeley, Janet, Johnston, Lisa G., Sonnenberg, Pam, Hayes, Richard J., Frost, Simon D. W., White, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402
_version_ 1782289335512465408
author McCreesh, Nicky
Copas, Andrew
Seeley, Janet
Johnston, Lisa G.
Sonnenberg, Pam
Hayes, Richard J.
Frost, Simon D. W.
White, Richard G.
author_facet McCreesh, Nicky
Copas, Andrew
Seeley, Janet
Johnston, Lisa G.
Sonnenberg, Pam
Hayes, Richard J.
Frost, Simon D. W.
White, Richard G.
author_sort McCreesh, Nicky
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimates if coupons are distributed non-randomly or if potential recruits present for interview non-randomly. We explore if biases detected in an RDS study were due to either of these mechanisms, and propose and apply weights to reduce bias due to non-random presentation for interview. METHODS: Using data from the total population, and the population to whom recruiters offered their coupons, we explored how age and socioeconomic status were associated with being offered a coupon, and, if offered a coupon, with presenting for interview. Population proportions were estimated by weighting by the assumed inverse probabilities of being offered a coupon (as in existing RDS methods), and also of presentation for interview if offered a coupon by age and socioeconomic status group. RESULTS: Younger men were under-recruited primarily because they were less likely to be offered coupons. The under-recruitment of higher socioeconomic status men was due in part to them being less likely to present for interview. Consistent with these findings, weighting for non-random presentation for interview by age and socioeconomic status group greatly improved the estimate of the proportion of men in the lowest socioeconomic group, reducing the root-mean-squared error of RDS estimates of socioeconomic status by 38%, but had little effect on estimates for age. The weighting also improved estimates for tribe and religion (reducing root-mean-squared-errors by 19–29%), but had little effect for sexual activity or HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from recruiters on the characteristics of men to whom they offered coupons may be used to reduce bias in RDS studies. Further evaluation of this new method is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3814964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38149642013-11-07 Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation McCreesh, Nicky Copas, Andrew Seeley, Janet Johnston, Lisa G. Sonnenberg, Pam Hayes, Richard J. Frost, Simon D. W. White, Richard G. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a variant of a link-tracing design intended for generating unbiased estimates of the composition of hidden populations that typically involves giving participants several coupons to recruit their peers into the study. RDS may generate biased estimates if coupons are distributed non-randomly or if potential recruits present for interview non-randomly. We explore if biases detected in an RDS study were due to either of these mechanisms, and propose and apply weights to reduce bias due to non-random presentation for interview. METHODS: Using data from the total population, and the population to whom recruiters offered their coupons, we explored how age and socioeconomic status were associated with being offered a coupon, and, if offered a coupon, with presenting for interview. Population proportions were estimated by weighting by the assumed inverse probabilities of being offered a coupon (as in existing RDS methods), and also of presentation for interview if offered a coupon by age and socioeconomic status group. RESULTS: Younger men were under-recruited primarily because they were less likely to be offered coupons. The under-recruitment of higher socioeconomic status men was due in part to them being less likely to present for interview. Consistent with these findings, weighting for non-random presentation for interview by age and socioeconomic status group greatly improved the estimate of the proportion of men in the lowest socioeconomic group, reducing the root-mean-squared error of RDS estimates of socioeconomic status by 38%, but had little effect on estimates for age. The weighting also improved estimates for tribe and religion (reducing root-mean-squared-errors by 19–29%), but had little effect for sexual activity or HIV status. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from recruiters on the characteristics of men to whom they offered coupons may be used to reduce bias in RDS studies. Further evaluation of this new method is required. Public Library of Science 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3814964/ /pubmed/24205221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402 Text en © 2013 McCreesh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCreesh, Nicky
Copas, Andrew
Seeley, Janet
Johnston, Lisa G.
Sonnenberg, Pam
Hayes, Richard J.
Frost, Simon D. W.
White, Richard G.
Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title_full Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title_fullStr Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title_short Respondent Driven Sampling: Determinants of Recruitment and a Method to Improve Point Estimation
title_sort respondent driven sampling: determinants of recruitment and a method to improve point estimation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3814964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24205221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078402
work_keys_str_mv AT mccreeshnicky respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT copasandrew respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT seeleyjanet respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT johnstonlisag respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT sonnenbergpam respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT hayesrichardj respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT frostsimondw respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation
AT whiterichardg respondentdrivensamplingdeterminantsofrecruitmentandamethodtoimprovepointestimation