Cargando…
Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to determine the technical feasibility and safety of extended-field radiotherapy (EF), performed by Helical TomoTherapy, in patients with positive pelvic and/or para-aortic nodes. Dosimetric data were collected and acute and sub-acute toxicities of the upper abdo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-247 |
_version_ | 1782477957540872192 |
---|---|
author | Bresciani, Sara Garibaldi, Elisabetta Cattari, Gabriella Maggio, Angelo Di Dia, Amalia Delmastro, Elena Gabriele, Domenico Stasi, Michele Gabriele, Pietro |
author_facet | Bresciani, Sara Garibaldi, Elisabetta Cattari, Gabriella Maggio, Angelo Di Dia, Amalia Delmastro, Elena Gabriele, Domenico Stasi, Michele Gabriele, Pietro |
author_sort | Bresciani, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to determine the technical feasibility and safety of extended-field radiotherapy (EF), performed by Helical TomoTherapy, in patients with positive pelvic and/or para-aortic nodes. Dosimetric data were collected and acute and sub-acute toxicities of the upper abdominal organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients suitable for EF irradiation for local disease and/or nodal disease in the pelvic or para-aortic area were treated. The prescription dose was 50.4/54 Gy (1.7-1.8 Gy/fraction) for prophylactic lymph nodes (N-) and 60–70.5 Gy (2–2.35 Gy/fraction) for clinically evident gross disease (N+). Modulation factor (MF), pitch and field width (FW) were chosen to optimize dose distribution and treatment duration. Dose values of PTVs and OAR were analysed. The length of the treatment field, the N + and N- volumes, and treatment duration were reported. To evaluate the safety of treatment, haematological, hepatic, renal and pancreatic functions were assessed before, during and after treatment. The median follow-up time was 17.6 months (range: 6–22 months). RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated and all patients but one completed treatment without interruption. Four of the 29 patients experienced G3 haematological acute toxicity (13.8%), but no patient experienced sub-acute grade G3 toxicity. Ten patients experienced G1 and three G2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea). No sub-acute gastrointestinal or renal toxicity was observed. Only one (3.7%) patient had a persistent slight increase of pancreatic enzymes and two (7.4%) patients a slight increase of hepatic enzymes six months after radiotherapy (G1 toxicity). CONCLUSIONS: With our treatment design and dose regimen, we found that EF treatment by TomoTherapy could be safely and effectively delivered with minimal acute and sub-acute toxicities in the upper abdomen area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3816584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38165842013-11-05 Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study Bresciani, Sara Garibaldi, Elisabetta Cattari, Gabriella Maggio, Angelo Di Dia, Amalia Delmastro, Elena Gabriele, Domenico Stasi, Michele Gabriele, Pietro Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to determine the technical feasibility and safety of extended-field radiotherapy (EF), performed by Helical TomoTherapy, in patients with positive pelvic and/or para-aortic nodes. Dosimetric data were collected and acute and sub-acute toxicities of the upper abdominal organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients suitable for EF irradiation for local disease and/or nodal disease in the pelvic or para-aortic area were treated. The prescription dose was 50.4/54 Gy (1.7-1.8 Gy/fraction) for prophylactic lymph nodes (N-) and 60–70.5 Gy (2–2.35 Gy/fraction) for clinically evident gross disease (N+). Modulation factor (MF), pitch and field width (FW) were chosen to optimize dose distribution and treatment duration. Dose values of PTVs and OAR were analysed. The length of the treatment field, the N + and N- volumes, and treatment duration were reported. To evaluate the safety of treatment, haematological, hepatic, renal and pancreatic functions were assessed before, during and after treatment. The median follow-up time was 17.6 months (range: 6–22 months). RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated and all patients but one completed treatment without interruption. Four of the 29 patients experienced G3 haematological acute toxicity (13.8%), but no patient experienced sub-acute grade G3 toxicity. Ten patients experienced G1 and three G2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea). No sub-acute gastrointestinal or renal toxicity was observed. Only one (3.7%) patient had a persistent slight increase of pancreatic enzymes and two (7.4%) patients a slight increase of hepatic enzymes six months after radiotherapy (G1 toxicity). CONCLUSIONS: With our treatment design and dose regimen, we found that EF treatment by TomoTherapy could be safely and effectively delivered with minimal acute and sub-acute toxicities in the upper abdomen area. BioMed Central 2013-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3816584/ /pubmed/24160769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-247 Text en Copyright © 2013 Bresciani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Bresciani, Sara Garibaldi, Elisabetta Cattari, Gabriella Maggio, Angelo Di Dia, Amalia Delmastro, Elena Gabriele, Domenico Stasi, Michele Gabriele, Pietro Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title | Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title_full | Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title_fullStr | Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title_short | Dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
title_sort | dose to organs at risk in the upper abdomen in patients treated with extended fields by helical tomotherapy: a dosimetric and clinical preliminary study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-8-247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brescianisara dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT garibaldielisabetta dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT cattarigabriella dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT maggioangelo dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT didiaamalia dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT delmastroelena dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT gabrieledomenico dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT stasimichele dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy AT gabrielepietro dosetoorgansatriskintheupperabdomeninpatientstreatedwithextendedfieldsbyhelicaltomotherapyadosimetricandclinicalpreliminarystudy |