Cargando…

Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups

BACKGROUND: Foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-State Inventory (DSSI) has been purported to be a reliable, systematic categorical measure to assess the patients with schizophrenia according to the degree of illness. However, further cross-validations using other clinical measures and diverse samples from ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun, Kim, Yeni, Chang, Jae Seung, Yun, Da Young, Kim, Yong Sik, Jung, Hee Yeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-251
_version_ 1782477961689038848
author Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun
Kim, Yeni
Chang, Jae Seung
Yun, Da Young
Kim, Yong Sik
Jung, Hee Yeon
author_facet Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun
Kim, Yeni
Chang, Jae Seung
Yun, Da Young
Kim, Yong Sik
Jung, Hee Yeon
author_sort Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-State Inventory (DSSI) has been purported to be a reliable, systematic categorical measure to assess the patients with schizophrenia according to the degree of illness. However, further cross-validations using other clinical measures and diverse samples from other cultures have not been advanced recently. We aimed to examine the validity of the DSSI hierarchical class model using both Korean non-patient and patient (schizophrenia and depression) groups. METHOD: The hypothesis of inclusive, non-reflexive relationships among the DSSI classes was tested. The power of DSSI to detect presence of symptoms was assessed via cross-validation with other clinical measures, and the differences between the clinical features among the DSSI classes were examined using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). RESULTS: The high rate of model conformity (91.1%) across the samples and cross-validation with other criterion measures provided further support for the validity of DSSI. CONCLUSIONS: DSSI is a reliable self-report measure that can be applied to both patient and non-patients to assess the presence and severity of psychiatric illness. Future studies that include more diverse clinical groups are necessary to lend further support for its utility in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3816604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38166042013-11-05 Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun Kim, Yeni Chang, Jae Seung Yun, Da Young Kim, Yong Sik Jung, Hee Yeon BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-State Inventory (DSSI) has been purported to be a reliable, systematic categorical measure to assess the patients with schizophrenia according to the degree of illness. However, further cross-validations using other clinical measures and diverse samples from other cultures have not been advanced recently. We aimed to examine the validity of the DSSI hierarchical class model using both Korean non-patient and patient (schizophrenia and depression) groups. METHOD: The hypothesis of inclusive, non-reflexive relationships among the DSSI classes was tested. The power of DSSI to detect presence of symptoms was assessed via cross-validation with other clinical measures, and the differences between the clinical features among the DSSI classes were examined using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). RESULTS: The high rate of model conformity (91.1%) across the samples and cross-validation with other criterion measures provided further support for the validity of DSSI. CONCLUSIONS: DSSI is a reliable self-report measure that can be applied to both patient and non-patients to assess the presence and severity of psychiatric illness. Future studies that include more diverse clinical groups are necessary to lend further support for its utility in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2013-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3816604/ /pubmed/24103322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-251 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hwang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hwang, Samuel Suk-Hyun
Kim, Yeni
Chang, Jae Seung
Yun, Da Young
Kim, Yong Sik
Jung, Hee Yeon
Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title_full Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title_fullStr Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title_full_unstemmed Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title_short Examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory with Korean non-patient and patient groups
title_sort examination of categorical approach to symptom assessment: cross-validation of foulds’ delusions-symptoms-states inventory with korean non-patient and patient groups
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24103322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-251
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangsamuelsukhyun examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups
AT kimyeni examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups
AT changjaeseung examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups
AT yundayoung examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups
AT kimyongsik examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups
AT jungheeyeon examinationofcategoricalapproachtosymptomassessmentcrossvalidationoffouldsdelusionssymptomsstatesinventorywithkoreannonpatientandpatientgroups