Cargando…

HbA(1c) and Lower-Extremity Amputation Risk in Low-Income Patients With Diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes confers a very high risk of lower-extremity amputation (LEA); however, few studies have assessed whether blood glucose control can reduce LEA risk among patients with diabetes, especially in practice settings where low-income patients predominate. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Wenhui, Katzmarzyk, Peter T., Horswell, Ronald, Wang, Yujie, Johnson, Jolene, Heymsfield, Steven B., Cefalu, William T., Ryan, Donna H., Hu, Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3816880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24062322
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-0437
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Diabetes confers a very high risk of lower-extremity amputation (LEA); however, few studies have assessed whether blood glucose control can reduce LEA risk among patients with diabetes, especially in practice settings where low-income patients predominate. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study (2000–2009) on patients with diabetes that included 19,808 African Americans and 15,560 whites. The cohort was followed though 31 May 2012. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association of HbA(1c) with LEA risk. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 6.83 years, 578 LEA incident cases were identified. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of LEA associated with different levels of HbA(1c) at baseline (<6.0% [reference group], 6.0–6.9, 7.0–7.9, 8.0–8.9, 9.0–9.9, and ≥10.0%) were 1.00, 1.73 (95% CI 1.07–2.80), 1.65 (0.99–2.77), 1.96 (1.14–3.36), 3.02 (1.81–5.04), and 3.30 (2.10–5.20) (P trend <0.001) for African American patients with diabetes and 1.00, 1.16 (0.66–2.02), 2.28 (1.35–3.85), 2.38 (1.36–4.18), 2.99 (1.71–5.22), and 3.25 (1.98–5.33) (P trend <0.001) for white patients with diabetes, respectively. The graded positive association of HbA(1c) during follow-up with LEA risk was observed among both African American and white patients with diabetes (all P trend <0.001). With stratification by sex, age, smoking status, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, BMI, use of glucose-lowering agents, and income, this graded association of HbA(1c) with LEA was still present. CONCLUSIONS: The current study conducted in a low-income population suggests a graded association between HbA(1c) and the risk of LEA among both African American and white patients with type 2 diabetes.