Cargando…

Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies

OBJECTIVES: The general health questionnaire (GHQ) is commonly used to assess symptoms of common mental disorder (CMD). Prevalence estimates for CMD caseness from UK population studies are thought to be in the range of 14–17%, and the UK occupational studies of which we are aware indicate a higher p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwin, Laura, Ben-Zion, Ilan, Fear, Nicola T., Hotopf, Matthew, Stansfeld, Stephen A., Wessely, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078693
_version_ 1782478013005299712
author Goodwin, Laura
Ben-Zion, Ilan
Fear, Nicola T.
Hotopf, Matthew
Stansfeld, Stephen A.
Wessely, Simon
author_facet Goodwin, Laura
Ben-Zion, Ilan
Fear, Nicola T.
Hotopf, Matthew
Stansfeld, Stephen A.
Wessely, Simon
author_sort Goodwin, Laura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The general health questionnaire (GHQ) is commonly used to assess symptoms of common mental disorder (CMD). Prevalence estimates for CMD caseness from UK population studies are thought to be in the range of 14–17%, and the UK occupational studies of which we are aware indicate a higher prevalence. This review will synthesise the existing research using the GHQ from both population and occupational studies and will compare the weighted prevalence estimates between them. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of CMD, as assessed by the GHQ, in all UK occupational and population studies conducted from 1990 onwards. RESULTS: The search revealed 65 occupational papers which met the search criteria and 15 relevant papers for UK population studies. The weighted prevalence estimate for CMD across all occupational studies which used the same version and cut-off for the GHQ was 29.6% (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 27.3–31.9%) and for comparable population studies was significantly lower at 19.1% (95% CIs 17.3–20.8%). This difference was reduced after restricting the studies by response rate and sampling method (23.9% (95% CIs 20.5%–27.4%) vs. 19.2% (95 CIs 17.1%–21.3%)). CONCLUSIONS: Counter intuitively, the prevalence of CMD is higher in occupational studies, compared to population studies (which include individuals not in employment), although this difference narrowed after accounting for measures of study quality, including response rate and sampling method. This finding is inconsistent with the healthy worker effect, which would presume lower levels of psychological symptoms in individuals in employment. One explanation is that the GHQ is sensitive to contextual factors, and it seems possible that symptoms of CMD are over reported when participants know that they have been recruited to a study on the basis that they belong to a specific occupational group, as in nearly all “stress” surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38170752013-11-09 Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies Goodwin, Laura Ben-Zion, Ilan Fear, Nicola T. Hotopf, Matthew Stansfeld, Stephen A. Wessely, Simon PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The general health questionnaire (GHQ) is commonly used to assess symptoms of common mental disorder (CMD). Prevalence estimates for CMD caseness from UK population studies are thought to be in the range of 14–17%, and the UK occupational studies of which we are aware indicate a higher prevalence. This review will synthesise the existing research using the GHQ from both population and occupational studies and will compare the weighted prevalence estimates between them. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence of CMD, as assessed by the GHQ, in all UK occupational and population studies conducted from 1990 onwards. RESULTS: The search revealed 65 occupational papers which met the search criteria and 15 relevant papers for UK population studies. The weighted prevalence estimate for CMD across all occupational studies which used the same version and cut-off for the GHQ was 29.6% (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 27.3–31.9%) and for comparable population studies was significantly lower at 19.1% (95% CIs 17.3–20.8%). This difference was reduced after restricting the studies by response rate and sampling method (23.9% (95% CIs 20.5%–27.4%) vs. 19.2% (95 CIs 17.1%–21.3%)). CONCLUSIONS: Counter intuitively, the prevalence of CMD is higher in occupational studies, compared to population studies (which include individuals not in employment), although this difference narrowed after accounting for measures of study quality, including response rate and sampling method. This finding is inconsistent with the healthy worker effect, which would presume lower levels of psychological symptoms in individuals in employment. One explanation is that the GHQ is sensitive to contextual factors, and it seems possible that symptoms of CMD are over reported when participants know that they have been recruited to a study on the basis that they belong to a specific occupational group, as in nearly all “stress” surveys. Public Library of Science 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3817075/ /pubmed/24223840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078693 Text en © 2013 Goodwin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goodwin, Laura
Ben-Zion, Ilan
Fear, Nicola T.
Hotopf, Matthew
Stansfeld, Stephen A.
Wessely, Simon
Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title_full Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title_fullStr Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title_full_unstemmed Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title_short Are Reports of Psychological Stress Higher in Occupational Studies? A Systematic Review across Occupational and Population Based Studies
title_sort are reports of psychological stress higher in occupational studies? a systematic review across occupational and population based studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078693
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwinlaura arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies
AT benzionilan arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies
AT fearnicolat arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies
AT hotopfmatthew arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies
AT stansfeldstephena arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies
AT wesselysimon arereportsofpsychologicalstresshigherinoccupationalstudiesasystematicreviewacrossoccupationalandpopulationbasedstudies