Cargando…

Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques

The relationship between canopy structure and light transmission to the forest floor is of particular interest for studying the effects of succession, timber harvest, and silviculture prescriptions on understory plants and trees. Indirect measurements of leaf area index (LAI) estimated using gap fra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eckrich, Carolyn A., Flaherty, Elizabeth A., Ben-David, Merav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077642
_version_ 1782478035154370560
author Eckrich, Carolyn A.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A.
Ben-David, Merav
author_facet Eckrich, Carolyn A.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A.
Ben-David, Merav
author_sort Eckrich, Carolyn A.
collection PubMed
description The relationship between canopy structure and light transmission to the forest floor is of particular interest for studying the effects of succession, timber harvest, and silviculture prescriptions on understory plants and trees. Indirect measurements of leaf area index (LAI) estimated using gap fraction analysis with linear and hemispheric sensors have been commonly used to assess radiation interception by the canopy, although the two methods often yield inconsistent results. We compared simultaneously obtained measurements of LAI from a linear ceptometer and digital hemispheric photography in 21 forest stands on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. We assessed the relationship between these estimates and allometric LAI based on tree diameter at breast height (LAI(DBH)). LAI values measured at 79 stations in thinned, un-thinned controls, old-growth and clearcut stands were highly correlated between the linear sensor (AccuPAR) and hemispheric photography, but the latter was more negatively biased compared to LAI(DBH). In contrast, AccuPAR values were more similar to LAI(DBH) in all stands with basal area less than 30 m(2)ha(−1). Values produced by integrating hemispheric photographs over the zenith angles 0–75° (Ring 5) were highly correlated with those integrated over the zenith angles 0–60° (Ring 4), although the discrepancies between the two measures were significant. On average, the AccuPAR estimates were 53% higher than those derived from Ring 5, with most of the differences in closed canopy stands (unthinned controls and old-growth) and less so in clearcuts. Following typical patterns of canopy closure, AccuPAR LAI values were higher in dense control stands than in old-growth, whereas the opposite was derived from Ring 5 analyses. Based on our results we advocate the preferential use of linear sensors where canopy openness is low, canopies are tall, and leaf distributions are clumped and angles are variable, as is common in the conifer forests of coastal Alaska.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38171932013-11-09 Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques Eckrich, Carolyn A. Flaherty, Elizabeth A. Ben-David, Merav PLoS One Research Article The relationship between canopy structure and light transmission to the forest floor is of particular interest for studying the effects of succession, timber harvest, and silviculture prescriptions on understory plants and trees. Indirect measurements of leaf area index (LAI) estimated using gap fraction analysis with linear and hemispheric sensors have been commonly used to assess radiation interception by the canopy, although the two methods often yield inconsistent results. We compared simultaneously obtained measurements of LAI from a linear ceptometer and digital hemispheric photography in 21 forest stands on Prince of Wales Island, Alaska. We assessed the relationship between these estimates and allometric LAI based on tree diameter at breast height (LAI(DBH)). LAI values measured at 79 stations in thinned, un-thinned controls, old-growth and clearcut stands were highly correlated between the linear sensor (AccuPAR) and hemispheric photography, but the latter was more negatively biased compared to LAI(DBH). In contrast, AccuPAR values were more similar to LAI(DBH) in all stands with basal area less than 30 m(2)ha(−1). Values produced by integrating hemispheric photographs over the zenith angles 0–75° (Ring 5) were highly correlated with those integrated over the zenith angles 0–60° (Ring 4), although the discrepancies between the two measures were significant. On average, the AccuPAR estimates were 53% higher than those derived from Ring 5, with most of the differences in closed canopy stands (unthinned controls and old-growth) and less so in clearcuts. Following typical patterns of canopy closure, AccuPAR LAI values were higher in dense control stands than in old-growth, whereas the opposite was derived from Ring 5 analyses. Based on our results we advocate the preferential use of linear sensors where canopy openness is low, canopies are tall, and leaf distributions are clumped and angles are variable, as is common in the conifer forests of coastal Alaska. Public Library of Science 2013-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3817193/ /pubmed/24223718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077642 Text en © 2013 Eckrich et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eckrich, Carolyn A.
Flaherty, Elizabeth A.
Ben-David, Merav
Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title_full Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title_fullStr Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title_short Estimating Leaf Area Index in Southeast Alaska: A Comparison of Two Techniques
title_sort estimating leaf area index in southeast alaska: a comparison of two techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077642
work_keys_str_mv AT eckrichcarolyna estimatingleafareaindexinsoutheastalaskaacomparisonoftwotechniques
AT flahertyelizabetha estimatingleafareaindexinsoutheastalaskaacomparisonoftwotechniques
AT bendavidmerav estimatingleafareaindexinsoutheastalaskaacomparisonoftwotechniques