Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uchida, Mayako, Kato, Koji, Ikesue, Hiroaki, Ichinose, Kimiko, Hiraiwa, Hiromi, Sakurai, Asako, Muta, Tsuyoshi, Takenaka, Katsuto, Iwasaki, Hiromi, Miyamoto, Toshihiro, Teshima, Takanori, Shiratsuchi, Motoaki, Suetsugu, Kimitaka, Nagata, Kenichiro, Egashira, Nobuaki, Akashi, Koichi, Oishi, Ryozo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294
_version_ 1782478087046299648
author Uchida, Mayako
Kato, Koji
Ikesue, Hiroaki
Ichinose, Kimiko
Hiraiwa, Hiromi
Sakurai, Asako
Muta, Tsuyoshi
Takenaka, Katsuto
Iwasaki, Hiromi
Miyamoto, Toshihiro
Teshima, Takanori
Shiratsuchi, Motoaki
Suetsugu, Kimitaka
Nagata, Kenichiro
Egashira, Nobuaki
Akashi, Koichi
Oishi, Ryozo
author_facet Uchida, Mayako
Kato, Koji
Ikesue, Hiroaki
Ichinose, Kimiko
Hiraiwa, Hiromi
Sakurai, Asako
Muta, Tsuyoshi
Takenaka, Katsuto
Iwasaki, Hiromi
Miyamoto, Toshihiro
Teshima, Takanori
Shiratsuchi, Motoaki
Suetsugu, Kimitaka
Nagata, Kenichiro
Egashira, Nobuaki
Akashi, Koichi
Oishi, Ryozo
author_sort Uchida, Mayako
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital in Japan. PATIENTS: Of 88 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT, 46 received aprepitant and granisetron as antiemetic therapy (between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011), and 42 received granisetron alone (between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2010). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in both groups received 3 mg of granisetron intravenously 30 minutes before the administration of anticancer drugs. In the aprepitant group, 125 mg of aprepitant was administered orally 60–90 minutes before the administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic anticancer drug. On the following days, 80 mg of aprepitant was administered orally every morning. The mean administration duration of aprepitant was 3.3 days (range 3–6 days). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR; no vomiting and none to mild nausea). The CR rate in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48% vs 24%, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that nonprophylactic use of aprepitant was associated with failure to achieve CR (odds ratio [OR] 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.99, p=0.03). The frequency of abdominal pain was lower in the aprepitant group (9% vs 25%, p=0.03). Rates of other frequently observed adverse drug events were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in neutrophil engraftment (median 18 vs 17 days), platelet engraftment (median 32 vs 32 days), the incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (63% vs 55%, p=0.52), viral infection (74% vs 67%, p=0.49), or 1-year overall survival (63% vs 62%, p=0.90) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aprepitant to granisetron increases the antiemetic effect without influencing transplantation-related toxicities in allo-HSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38175202013-11-09 Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Uchida, Mayako Kato, Koji Ikesue, Hiroaki Ichinose, Kimiko Hiraiwa, Hiromi Sakurai, Asako Muta, Tsuyoshi Takenaka, Katsuto Iwasaki, Hiromi Miyamoto, Toshihiro Teshima, Takanori Shiratsuchi, Motoaki Suetsugu, Kimitaka Nagata, Kenichiro Egashira, Nobuaki Akashi, Koichi Oishi, Ryozo Pharmacotherapy Original Research Articles STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital in Japan. PATIENTS: Of 88 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT, 46 received aprepitant and granisetron as antiemetic therapy (between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011), and 42 received granisetron alone (between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2010). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in both groups received 3 mg of granisetron intravenously 30 minutes before the administration of anticancer drugs. In the aprepitant group, 125 mg of aprepitant was administered orally 60–90 minutes before the administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic anticancer drug. On the following days, 80 mg of aprepitant was administered orally every morning. The mean administration duration of aprepitant was 3.3 days (range 3–6 days). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR; no vomiting and none to mild nausea). The CR rate in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48% vs 24%, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that nonprophylactic use of aprepitant was associated with failure to achieve CR (odds ratio [OR] 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.99, p=0.03). The frequency of abdominal pain was lower in the aprepitant group (9% vs 25%, p=0.03). Rates of other frequently observed adverse drug events were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in neutrophil engraftment (median 18 vs 17 days), platelet engraftment (median 32 vs 32 days), the incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (63% vs 55%, p=0.52), viral infection (74% vs 67%, p=0.49), or 1-year overall survival (63% vs 62%, p=0.90) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aprepitant to granisetron increases the antiemetic effect without influencing transplantation-related toxicities in allo-HSCT. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-09 2013-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3817520/ /pubmed/23712662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294 Text en © 2013 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Uchida, Mayako
Kato, Koji
Ikesue, Hiroaki
Ichinose, Kimiko
Hiraiwa, Hiromi
Sakurai, Asako
Muta, Tsuyoshi
Takenaka, Katsuto
Iwasaki, Hiromi
Miyamoto, Toshihiro
Teshima, Takanori
Shiratsuchi, Motoaki
Suetsugu, Kimitaka
Nagata, Kenichiro
Egashira, Nobuaki
Akashi, Koichi
Oishi, Ryozo
Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
title_sort efficacy and safety of aprepitant in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294
work_keys_str_mv AT uchidamayako efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT katokoji efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT ikesuehiroaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT ichinosekimiko efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT hiraiwahiromi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT sakuraiasako efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT mutatsuyoshi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT takenakakatsuto efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT iwasakihiromi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT miyamototoshihiro efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT teshimatakanori efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT shiratsuchimotoaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT suetsugukimitaka efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT nagatakenichiro efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT egashiranobuaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT akashikoichi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation
AT oishiryozo efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation