Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294 |
_version_ | 1782478087046299648 |
---|---|
author | Uchida, Mayako Kato, Koji Ikesue, Hiroaki Ichinose, Kimiko Hiraiwa, Hiromi Sakurai, Asako Muta, Tsuyoshi Takenaka, Katsuto Iwasaki, Hiromi Miyamoto, Toshihiro Teshima, Takanori Shiratsuchi, Motoaki Suetsugu, Kimitaka Nagata, Kenichiro Egashira, Nobuaki Akashi, Koichi Oishi, Ryozo |
author_facet | Uchida, Mayako Kato, Koji Ikesue, Hiroaki Ichinose, Kimiko Hiraiwa, Hiromi Sakurai, Asako Muta, Tsuyoshi Takenaka, Katsuto Iwasaki, Hiromi Miyamoto, Toshihiro Teshima, Takanori Shiratsuchi, Motoaki Suetsugu, Kimitaka Nagata, Kenichiro Egashira, Nobuaki Akashi, Koichi Oishi, Ryozo |
author_sort | Uchida, Mayako |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital in Japan. PATIENTS: Of 88 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT, 46 received aprepitant and granisetron as antiemetic therapy (between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011), and 42 received granisetron alone (between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2010). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in both groups received 3 mg of granisetron intravenously 30 minutes before the administration of anticancer drugs. In the aprepitant group, 125 mg of aprepitant was administered orally 60–90 minutes before the administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic anticancer drug. On the following days, 80 mg of aprepitant was administered orally every morning. The mean administration duration of aprepitant was 3.3 days (range 3–6 days). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR; no vomiting and none to mild nausea). The CR rate in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48% vs 24%, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that nonprophylactic use of aprepitant was associated with failure to achieve CR (odds ratio [OR] 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.99, p=0.03). The frequency of abdominal pain was lower in the aprepitant group (9% vs 25%, p=0.03). Rates of other frequently observed adverse drug events were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in neutrophil engraftment (median 18 vs 17 days), platelet engraftment (median 32 vs 32 days), the incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (63% vs 55%, p=0.52), viral infection (74% vs 67%, p=0.49), or 1-year overall survival (63% vs 62%, p=0.90) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aprepitant to granisetron increases the antiemetic effect without influencing transplantation-related toxicities in allo-HSCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3817520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38175202013-11-09 Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Uchida, Mayako Kato, Koji Ikesue, Hiroaki Ichinose, Kimiko Hiraiwa, Hiromi Sakurai, Asako Muta, Tsuyoshi Takenaka, Katsuto Iwasaki, Hiromi Miyamoto, Toshihiro Teshima, Takanori Shiratsuchi, Motoaki Suetsugu, Kimitaka Nagata, Kenichiro Egashira, Nobuaki Akashi, Koichi Oishi, Ryozo Pharmacotherapy Original Research Articles STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprepitant added to standard antiemetic regimens used in high-dose chemotherapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Hematology ward of a university hospital in Japan. PATIENTS: Of 88 patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by allo-HSCT, 46 received aprepitant and granisetron as antiemetic therapy (between April 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011), and 42 received granisetron alone (between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2010). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in both groups received 3 mg of granisetron intravenously 30 minutes before the administration of anticancer drugs. In the aprepitant group, 125 mg of aprepitant was administered orally 60–90 minutes before the administration of the first moderately to highly emetogenic anticancer drug. On the following days, 80 mg of aprepitant was administered orally every morning. The mean administration duration of aprepitant was 3.3 days (range 3–6 days). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary objective was to evaluate the percentage of patients who achieved complete response (CR; no vomiting and none to mild nausea). The CR rate in the aprepitant group was significantly higher than that in the control group (48% vs 24%, p=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that nonprophylactic use of aprepitant was associated with failure to achieve CR (odds ratio [OR] 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.99, p=0.03). The frequency of abdominal pain was lower in the aprepitant group (9% vs 25%, p=0.03). Rates of other frequently observed adverse drug events were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in neutrophil engraftment (median 18 vs 17 days), platelet engraftment (median 32 vs 32 days), the incidence of acute graft-versus-host-disease (63% vs 55%, p=0.52), viral infection (74% vs 67%, p=0.49), or 1-year overall survival (63% vs 62%, p=0.90) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of aprepitant to granisetron increases the antiemetic effect without influencing transplantation-related toxicities in allo-HSCT. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-09 2013-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3817520/ /pubmed/23712662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294 Text en © 2013 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Uchida, Mayako Kato, Koji Ikesue, Hiroaki Ichinose, Kimiko Hiraiwa, Hiromi Sakurai, Asako Muta, Tsuyoshi Takenaka, Katsuto Iwasaki, Hiromi Miyamoto, Toshihiro Teshima, Takanori Shiratsuchi, Motoaki Suetsugu, Kimitaka Nagata, Kenichiro Egashira, Nobuaki Akashi, Koichi Oishi, Ryozo Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Aprepitant in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of aprepitant in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23712662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phar.1294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT uchidamayako efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT katokoji efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT ikesuehiroaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT ichinosekimiko efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT hiraiwahiromi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT sakuraiasako efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT mutatsuyoshi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT takenakakatsuto efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT iwasakihiromi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT miyamototoshihiro efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT teshimatakanori efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT shiratsuchimotoaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT suetsugukimitaka efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT nagatakenichiro efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT egashiranobuaki efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT akashikoichi efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation AT oishiryozo efficacyandsafetyofaprepitantinallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantation |