Cargando…

Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index

The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalessandri, Domenico, Migliorati, Marco, Rubiano, Rachele, Visconti, Luca, Contardo, Luca, Di Lenarda, Roberto, Martin, Conchita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24235889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234
_version_ 1782478101873164288
author Dalessandri, Domenico
Migliorati, Marco
Rubiano, Rachele
Visconti, Luca
Contardo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Martin, Conchita
author_facet Dalessandri, Domenico
Migliorati, Marco
Rubiano, Rachele
Visconti, Luca
Contardo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Martin, Conchita
author_sort Dalessandri, Domenico
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fifty impacted canines, obtained using three different scanners (NewTom, Kodak, and Planmeca), were classified using the KPG index by three independent orthodontists. Measurements were repeated one month later. Based on these two sessions, several recommendations on KPG Index scoring were elaborated. After a joint calibration session, these recommendations were explained to nine orthodontists and the two measurement sessions were repeated. There was a moderate intrarater agreement in the precalibration measurement sessions. After the calibration session, both intra- and interrater agreement were almost perfect. Indexes assessed with Kodak Dental Imaging 3D module software showed a better reliability in z-axis values, whereas indexes assessed with Planmeca Romexis software showed a better reliability in x- and y-axis values. No differences were found between the CBCT scanners used. Taken together, these findings indicate that the application of the instructions elaborated during this study improved KPG index reliability, which was nevertheless variously influenced by the use of different software for images evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38176332013-11-14 Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index Dalessandri, Domenico Migliorati, Marco Rubiano, Rachele Visconti, Luca Contardo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Martin, Conchita ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fifty impacted canines, obtained using three different scanners (NewTom, Kodak, and Planmeca), were classified using the KPG index by three independent orthodontists. Measurements were repeated one month later. Based on these two sessions, several recommendations on KPG Index scoring were elaborated. After a joint calibration session, these recommendations were explained to nine orthodontists and the two measurement sessions were repeated. There was a moderate intrarater agreement in the precalibration measurement sessions. After the calibration session, both intra- and interrater agreement were almost perfect. Indexes assessed with Kodak Dental Imaging 3D module software showed a better reliability in z-axis values, whereas indexes assessed with Planmeca Romexis software showed a better reliability in x- and y-axis values. No differences were found between the CBCT scanners used. Taken together, these findings indicate that the application of the instructions elaborated during this study improved KPG index reliability, which was nevertheless variously influenced by the use of different software for images evaluation. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3817633/ /pubmed/24235889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234 Text en Copyright © 2013 Domenico Dalessandri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dalessandri, Domenico
Migliorati, Marco
Rubiano, Rachele
Visconti, Luca
Contardo, Luca
Di Lenarda, Roberto
Martin, Conchita
Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title_full Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title_fullStr Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title_short Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
title_sort reliability of a novel cbct-based 3d classification system for maxillary canine impactions in orthodontics: the kpg index
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24235889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234
work_keys_str_mv AT dalessandridomenico reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT miglioratimarco reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT rubianorachele reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT viscontiluca reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT contardoluca reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT dilenardaroberto reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex
AT martinconchita reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex