Cargando…
Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index
The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24235889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234 |
_version_ | 1782478101873164288 |
---|---|
author | Dalessandri, Domenico Migliorati, Marco Rubiano, Rachele Visconti, Luca Contardo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Martin, Conchita |
author_facet | Dalessandri, Domenico Migliorati, Marco Rubiano, Rachele Visconti, Luca Contardo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Martin, Conchita |
author_sort | Dalessandri, Domenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fifty impacted canines, obtained using three different scanners (NewTom, Kodak, and Planmeca), were classified using the KPG index by three independent orthodontists. Measurements were repeated one month later. Based on these two sessions, several recommendations on KPG Index scoring were elaborated. After a joint calibration session, these recommendations were explained to nine orthodontists and the two measurement sessions were repeated. There was a moderate intrarater agreement in the precalibration measurement sessions. After the calibration session, both intra- and interrater agreement were almost perfect. Indexes assessed with Kodak Dental Imaging 3D module software showed a better reliability in z-axis values, whereas indexes assessed with Planmeca Romexis software showed a better reliability in x- and y-axis values. No differences were found between the CBCT scanners used. Taken together, these findings indicate that the application of the instructions elaborated during this study improved KPG index reliability, which was nevertheless variously influenced by the use of different software for images evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3817633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38176332013-11-14 Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index Dalessandri, Domenico Migliorati, Marco Rubiano, Rachele Visconti, Luca Contardo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Martin, Conchita ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The aim of this study was to evaluate both intra- and interoperator reliability of a radiological three-dimensional classification system (KPG index) for the assessment of degree of difficulty for orthodontic treatment of maxillary canine impactions. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of fifty impacted canines, obtained using three different scanners (NewTom, Kodak, and Planmeca), were classified using the KPG index by three independent orthodontists. Measurements were repeated one month later. Based on these two sessions, several recommendations on KPG Index scoring were elaborated. After a joint calibration session, these recommendations were explained to nine orthodontists and the two measurement sessions were repeated. There was a moderate intrarater agreement in the precalibration measurement sessions. After the calibration session, both intra- and interrater agreement were almost perfect. Indexes assessed with Kodak Dental Imaging 3D module software showed a better reliability in z-axis values, whereas indexes assessed with Planmeca Romexis software showed a better reliability in x- and y-axis values. No differences were found between the CBCT scanners used. Taken together, these findings indicate that the application of the instructions elaborated during this study improved KPG index reliability, which was nevertheless variously influenced by the use of different software for images evaluation. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3817633/ /pubmed/24235889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234 Text en Copyright © 2013 Domenico Dalessandri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dalessandri, Domenico Migliorati, Marco Rubiano, Rachele Visconti, Luca Contardo, Luca Di Lenarda, Roberto Martin, Conchita Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title | Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title_full | Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title_fullStr | Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title_short | Reliability of a Novel CBCT-Based 3D Classification System for Maxillary Canine Impactions in Orthodontics: The KPG Index |
title_sort | reliability of a novel cbct-based 3d classification system for maxillary canine impactions in orthodontics: the kpg index |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24235889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/921234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalessandridomenico reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT miglioratimarco reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT rubianorachele reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT viscontiluca reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT contardoluca reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT dilenardaroberto reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex AT martinconchita reliabilityofanovelcbctbased3dclassificationsystemformaxillarycanineimpactionsinorthodonticsthekpgindex |