Cargando…
Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702 |
Sumario: | The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration in construction, as this element represents about 33% of total building construction costs. In this research, four constructed buildings were analyzed, with these having either reinforced concrete (RC) or steel (S) structures. An input-output framework analysis was used to measure energy consumption and CO(2) emissions of input materials for each structural frame type. In addition, the CO(2) emissions cost was measured using the trading price of CO(2) emissions on the International Commodity Exchange. This research revealed that both energy consumption and CO(2) emissions were, on average, 26% lower with the RC structure than with the S structure, and the construction costs (including the CO(2) emissions cost) of the RC structure were about 9.8% lower, compared to the S structure. This research provides insights through which the construction industry will be able to respond to the carbon market, which is expected to continue to grow in the future. |
---|