Cargando…

Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types

The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sangyong, Moon, Joon-Ho, Shin, Yoonseok, Kim, Gwang-Hee, Seo, Deok-Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702
_version_ 1782478107652915200
author Kim, Sangyong
Moon, Joon-Ho
Shin, Yoonseok
Kim, Gwang-Hee
Seo, Deok-Seok
author_facet Kim, Sangyong
Moon, Joon-Ho
Shin, Yoonseok
Kim, Gwang-Hee
Seo, Deok-Seok
author_sort Kim, Sangyong
collection PubMed
description The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration in construction, as this element represents about 33% of total building construction costs. In this research, four constructed buildings were analyzed, with these having either reinforced concrete (RC) or steel (S) structures. An input-output framework analysis was used to measure energy consumption and CO(2) emissions of input materials for each structural frame type. In addition, the CO(2) emissions cost was measured using the trading price of CO(2) emissions on the International Commodity Exchange. This research revealed that both energy consumption and CO(2) emissions were, on average, 26% lower with the RC structure than with the S structure, and the construction costs (including the CO(2) emissions cost) of the RC structure were about 9.8% lower, compared to the S structure. This research provides insights through which the construction industry will be able to respond to the carbon market, which is expected to continue to grow in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38176592013-11-13 Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types Kim, Sangyong Moon, Joon-Ho Shin, Yoonseok Kim, Gwang-Hee Seo, Deok-Seok ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration in construction, as this element represents about 33% of total building construction costs. In this research, four constructed buildings were analyzed, with these having either reinforced concrete (RC) or steel (S) structures. An input-output framework analysis was used to measure energy consumption and CO(2) emissions of input materials for each structural frame type. In addition, the CO(2) emissions cost was measured using the trading price of CO(2) emissions on the International Commodity Exchange. This research revealed that both energy consumption and CO(2) emissions were, on average, 26% lower with the RC structure than with the S structure, and the construction costs (including the CO(2) emissions cost) of the RC structure were about 9.8% lower, compared to the S structure. This research provides insights through which the construction industry will be able to respond to the carbon market, which is expected to continue to grow in the future. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3817659/ /pubmed/24227998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sangyong Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Sangyong
Moon, Joon-Ho
Shin, Yoonseok
Kim, Gwang-Hee
Seo, Deok-Seok
Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title_full Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title_fullStr Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title_full_unstemmed Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title_short Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
title_sort life comparative analysis of energy consumption and co(2) emissions of different building structural frame types
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsangyong lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes
AT moonjoonho lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes
AT shinyoonseok lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes
AT kimgwanghee lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes
AT seodeokseok lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes