Cargando…
Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types
The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702 |
_version_ | 1782478107652915200 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sangyong Moon, Joon-Ho Shin, Yoonseok Kim, Gwang-Hee Seo, Deok-Seok |
author_facet | Kim, Sangyong Moon, Joon-Ho Shin, Yoonseok Kim, Gwang-Hee Seo, Deok-Seok |
author_sort | Kim, Sangyong |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration in construction, as this element represents about 33% of total building construction costs. In this research, four constructed buildings were analyzed, with these having either reinforced concrete (RC) or steel (S) structures. An input-output framework analysis was used to measure energy consumption and CO(2) emissions of input materials for each structural frame type. In addition, the CO(2) emissions cost was measured using the trading price of CO(2) emissions on the International Commodity Exchange. This research revealed that both energy consumption and CO(2) emissions were, on average, 26% lower with the RC structure than with the S structure, and the construction costs (including the CO(2) emissions cost) of the RC structure were about 9.8% lower, compared to the S structure. This research provides insights through which the construction industry will be able to respond to the carbon market, which is expected to continue to grow in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3817659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38176592013-11-13 Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types Kim, Sangyong Moon, Joon-Ho Shin, Yoonseok Kim, Gwang-Hee Seo, Deok-Seok ScientificWorldJournal Research Article The objective of this research is to quantitatively measure and compare the environmental load and construction cost of different structural frame types. Construction cost also accounts for the costs of CO(2) emissions of input materials. The choice of structural frame type is a major consideration in construction, as this element represents about 33% of total building construction costs. In this research, four constructed buildings were analyzed, with these having either reinforced concrete (RC) or steel (S) structures. An input-output framework analysis was used to measure energy consumption and CO(2) emissions of input materials for each structural frame type. In addition, the CO(2) emissions cost was measured using the trading price of CO(2) emissions on the International Commodity Exchange. This research revealed that both energy consumption and CO(2) emissions were, on average, 26% lower with the RC structure than with the S structure, and the construction costs (including the CO(2) emissions cost) of the RC structure were about 9.8% lower, compared to the S structure. This research provides insights through which the construction industry will be able to respond to the carbon market, which is expected to continue to grow in the future. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3817659/ /pubmed/24227998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sangyong Kim et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Sangyong Moon, Joon-Ho Shin, Yoonseok Kim, Gwang-Hee Seo, Deok-Seok Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title | Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title_full | Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title_fullStr | Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title_full_unstemmed | Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title_short | Life Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption and CO(2) Emissions of Different Building Structural Frame Types |
title_sort | life comparative analysis of energy consumption and co(2) emissions of different building structural frame types |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24227998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/175702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimsangyong lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes AT moonjoonho lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes AT shinyoonseok lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes AT kimgwanghee lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes AT seodeokseok lifecomparativeanalysisofenergyconsumptionandco2emissionsofdifferentbuildingstructuralframetypes |