Cargando…

Molecular replacement: tricks and treats

Molecular replacement is the method of choice for X-ray crystallographic structure determination provided that suitable structural homologues are available in the PDB. Presently, there are ∼80 000 structures in the PDB (8074 were deposited in the year 2012 alone), of which ∼70% have been solved by m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Abergel, Chantal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24189227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913015291
_version_ 1782478112283426816
author Abergel, Chantal
author_facet Abergel, Chantal
author_sort Abergel, Chantal
collection PubMed
description Molecular replacement is the method of choice for X-ray crystallographic structure determination provided that suitable structural homologues are available in the PDB. Presently, there are ∼80 000 structures in the PDB (8074 were deposited in the year 2012 alone), of which ∼70% have been solved by molecular replacement. For successful molecular replacement the model must cover at least 50% of the total structure and the C(α) r.m.s.d. between the core model and the structure to be solved must be less than 2 Å. Here, an approach originally implemented in the CaspR server (http://www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr/Caspr2/index.cgi) based on homology modelling to search for a molecular-replacement solution is discussed. How the use of as much information as possible from different sources can improve the model(s) is briefly described. The combination of structural information with distantly related sequences is crucial to optimize the multiple alignment that will define the boundaries of the core domains. PDB clusters (sequences with ≥30% identical residues) can also provide information on the eventual changes in conformation and will help to explore the relative orientations assumed by protein subdomains. Normal-mode analysis can also help in generating series of conformational models in the search for a molecular-replacement solution. Of course, finding a correct solution is only the first step and the accuracy of the identified solution is as important as the data quality to proceed through refinement. Here, some possible reasons for failure are discussed and solutions are proposed using a set of successful examples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3817689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38176892013-11-06 Molecular replacement: tricks and treats Abergel, Chantal Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Research Papers Molecular replacement is the method of choice for X-ray crystallographic structure determination provided that suitable structural homologues are available in the PDB. Presently, there are ∼80 000 structures in the PDB (8074 were deposited in the year 2012 alone), of which ∼70% have been solved by molecular replacement. For successful molecular replacement the model must cover at least 50% of the total structure and the C(α) r.m.s.d. between the core model and the structure to be solved must be less than 2 Å. Here, an approach originally implemented in the CaspR server (http://www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr/Caspr2/index.cgi) based on homology modelling to search for a molecular-replacement solution is discussed. How the use of as much information as possible from different sources can improve the model(s) is briefly described. The combination of structural information with distantly related sequences is crucial to optimize the multiple alignment that will define the boundaries of the core domains. PDB clusters (sequences with ≥30% identical residues) can also provide information on the eventual changes in conformation and will help to explore the relative orientations assumed by protein subdomains. Normal-mode analysis can also help in generating series of conformational models in the search for a molecular-replacement solution. Of course, finding a correct solution is only the first step and the accuracy of the identified solution is as important as the data quality to proceed through refinement. Here, some possible reasons for failure are discussed and solutions are proposed using a set of successful examples. International Union of Crystallography 2013-11-01 2013-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3817689/ /pubmed/24189227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913015291 Text en © Abergel 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Abergel, Chantal
Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title_full Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title_fullStr Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title_full_unstemmed Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title_short Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
title_sort molecular replacement: tricks and treats
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3817689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24189227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913015291
work_keys_str_mv AT abergelchantal molecularreplacementtricksandtreats