Cargando…

Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints

The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so mis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blomqvist, Linus, Brook, Barry W., Ellis, Erle C., Kareiva, Peter M., Nordhaus, Ted, Shellenberger, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700
_version_ 1782478152594882560
author Blomqvist, Linus
Brook, Barry W.
Ellis, Erle C.
Kareiva, Peter M.
Nordhaus, Ted
Shellenberger, Michael
author_facet Blomqvist, Linus
Brook, Barry W.
Ellis, Erle C.
Kareiva, Peter M.
Nordhaus, Ted
Shellenberger, Michael
author_sort Blomqvist, Linus
collection PubMed
description The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38181652013-11-09 Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints Blomqvist, Linus Brook, Barry W. Ellis, Erle C. Kareiva, Peter M. Nordhaus, Ted Shellenberger, Michael PLoS Biol Perspective The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818165/ /pubmed/24223517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 Text en © 2013 Blomqvist et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Perspective
Blomqvist, Linus
Brook, Barry W.
Ellis, Erle C.
Kareiva, Peter M.
Nordhaus, Ted
Shellenberger, Michael
Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title_full Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title_fullStr Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title_full_unstemmed Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title_short Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
title_sort does the shoe fit? real versus imagined ecological footprints
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700
work_keys_str_mv AT blomqvistlinus doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints
AT brookbarryw doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints
AT elliserlec doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints
AT kareivapeterm doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints
AT nordhausted doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints
AT shellenbergermichael doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints