Cargando…
Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so mis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 |
_version_ | 1782478152594882560 |
---|---|
author | Blomqvist, Linus Brook, Barry W. Ellis, Erle C. Kareiva, Peter M. Nordhaus, Ted Shellenberger, Michael |
author_facet | Blomqvist, Linus Brook, Barry W. Ellis, Erle C. Kareiva, Peter M. Nordhaus, Ted Shellenberger, Michael |
author_sort | Blomqvist, Linus |
collection | PubMed |
description | The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38181652013-11-09 Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints Blomqvist, Linus Brook, Barry W. Ellis, Erle C. Kareiva, Peter M. Nordhaus, Ted Shellenberger, Michael PLoS Biol Perspective The global overshoot indicated by Ecological Footprint calculations consists entirely of an unreliable reframing of human carbon emissions and none of the five other land-use categories—cropland, grazing land, built-up land, fishing grounds, and forests. The Ecological Footprint is therefore “so misleading as to preclude its use in any serious science or policy context,” argue Blomqvist et al. in this perspective. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818165/ /pubmed/24223517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 Text en © 2013 Blomqvist et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Blomqvist, Linus Brook, Barry W. Ellis, Erle C. Kareiva, Peter M. Nordhaus, Ted Shellenberger, Michael Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title | Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title_full | Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title_fullStr | Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title_short | Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints |
title_sort | does the shoe fit? real versus imagined ecological footprints |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blomqvistlinus doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints AT brookbarryw doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints AT elliserlec doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints AT kareivapeterm doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints AT nordhausted doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints AT shellenbergermichael doestheshoefitrealversusimaginedecologicalfootprints |