Cargando…
The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth
In a Formal Comment, Rees and Wackernagel defend their global Ecological Footprint calculations against criticisms in this issue of PLOS Biology that they are potentially misleading.
Autores principales: | Rees, William E., Wackernagel, Mathis |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001701 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Ecological Footprint Remains a Misleading Metric of Global Sustainability
por: Blomqvist, Linus, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Inclusive Fitness Theorizing Invokes Phenomena That Are Not Relevant for the Evolution of Eusociality
por: Nowak, Martin A., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
On the genetic basis of the effect of Spiroplasma on the male reproductive fitness of Glossina fuscipes fuscipes
por: Oropeza-Rodriguez, Edward, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Comment on “Indirect Fitness Benefits Enable the Spread of Host Genes Promoting Costly Transfer of Beneficial Plasmids”
por: Jamieson-Lane, Alastair, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The microbiome and the human: A reply to Parke and colleagues
por: Rees, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2018)