The Ecological Footprint Remains a Misleading Metric of Global Sustainability

In this Formal Comment, Blomqvist et al. note that the main points of their Perspective, “Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints,” are robust to Rees and Wackernagel's response, “The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth.”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blomqvist, Linus, Brook, Barry W., Ellis, Erle C., Kareiva, Peter M., Nordhaus, Ted, Shellenberger, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Formal Comment
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702
Descripción
Sumario:In this Formal Comment, Blomqvist et al. note that the main points of their Perspective, “Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints,” are robust to Rees and Wackernagel's response, “The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth.”

Ejemplares similares