Cargando…
The Ecological Footprint Remains a Misleading Metric of Global Sustainability
In this Formal Comment, Blomqvist et al. note that the main points of their Perspective, “Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints,” are robust to Rees and Wackernagel's response, “The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth.”
Autores principales: | Blomqvist, Linus, Brook, Barry W., Ellis, Erle C., Kareiva, Peter M., Nordhaus, Ted, Shellenberger, Michael |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints
por: Blomqvist, Linus, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
On testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method: Relying on scaling symmetries can be misleading
por: Villaverde, Alejandro F., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth
por: Rees, William E., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Multiple drivers of ecological change in Arctic lakes and ponds
por: Gajewski, Konrad
Publicado: (2021) -
Formal comment to Soler et al.: Great spotted cuckoo nestlings have no antipredatory effect on magpie or carrion crow host nests in southern Spain
por: Canestrari, Daniela, et al.
Publicado: (2017)