Cargando…
Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood
Epidemiological studies show that elevated plasma levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are associated with diabetes, kidney disease, and heart disease. Thus AGEs have been used as disease progression markers. However, the effects of variations in biological sample processing procedures o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
the Society for Free Radical Research Japan
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24249965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.13-5 |
_version_ | 1782478166102638592 |
---|---|
author | Hull, George L.J. Woodside, Jayne V. Ames, Jennifer M. Cuskelly, Geraldine J. |
author_facet | Hull, George L.J. Woodside, Jayne V. Ames, Jennifer M. Cuskelly, Geraldine J. |
author_sort | Hull, George L.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epidemiological studies show that elevated plasma levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are associated with diabetes, kidney disease, and heart disease. Thus AGEs have been used as disease progression markers. However, the effects of variations in biological sample processing procedures on the level of AGEs in plasma/serum samples have not been investigated. The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of variations in blood sample collection on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), the best characterised AGE, and its homolog, N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine (CEL). The investigation examined the effect on CML and CEL of different blood collection tubes, inclusion of a stabilising cocktail, effect of freeze thaw cycles, different storage times and temperatures, and effects of delaying centrifugation on a pooled sample from healthy volunteers. CML and CEL were measured in extracted samples by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Median CML and CEL ranged from 0.132 to 0.140 mM/M lys and from 0.053 to 0.060 mM/M lys, respectively. No significant difference was shown CML or CEL in plasma/serum samples. Therefore samples collected as part of epidemiological studies that do not undergo specific sample treatment at collection are suitable for measuring CML and CEL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | the Society for Free Radical Research Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38182702013-11-18 Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood Hull, George L.J. Woodside, Jayne V. Ames, Jennifer M. Cuskelly, Geraldine J. J Clin Biochem Nutr Original Article Epidemiological studies show that elevated plasma levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are associated with diabetes, kidney disease, and heart disease. Thus AGEs have been used as disease progression markers. However, the effects of variations in biological sample processing procedures on the level of AGEs in plasma/serum samples have not been investigated. The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of variations in blood sample collection on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), the best characterised AGE, and its homolog, N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine (CEL). The investigation examined the effect on CML and CEL of different blood collection tubes, inclusion of a stabilising cocktail, effect of freeze thaw cycles, different storage times and temperatures, and effects of delaying centrifugation on a pooled sample from healthy volunteers. CML and CEL were measured in extracted samples by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Median CML and CEL ranged from 0.132 to 0.140 mM/M lys and from 0.053 to 0.060 mM/M lys, respectively. No significant difference was shown CML or CEL in plasma/serum samples. Therefore samples collected as part of epidemiological studies that do not undergo specific sample treatment at collection are suitable for measuring CML and CEL. the Society for Free Radical Research Japan 2013-11 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3818270/ /pubmed/24249965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.13-5 Text en Copyright © 2013 JCBN This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hull, George L.J. Woodside, Jayne V. Ames, Jennifer M. Cuskelly, Geraldine J. Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title | Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title_full | Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title_fullStr | Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title_short | Validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured N(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and N(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
title_sort | validation study to compare effects of processing protocols on measured n(ε)-(carboxymethyl)lysine and n(ε)-(carboxyethyl)lysine in blood |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24249965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.13-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hullgeorgelj validationstudytocompareeffectsofprocessingprotocolsonmeasurednecarboxymethyllysineandnecarboxyethyllysineinblood AT woodsidejaynev validationstudytocompareeffectsofprocessingprotocolsonmeasurednecarboxymethyllysineandnecarboxyethyllysineinblood AT amesjenniferm validationstudytocompareeffectsofprocessingprotocolsonmeasurednecarboxymethyllysineandnecarboxyethyllysineinblood AT cuskellygeraldinej validationstudytocompareeffectsofprocessingprotocolsonmeasurednecarboxymethyllysineandnecarboxyethyllysineinblood |