Cargando…

Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients

OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Xiaogang, Ding, Jie, Qi, Yue, Jia, Nan, Chu, Shaoli, Lin, Jinxiu, Su, Jinzi, Peng, Feng, Niu, Wenquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499
_version_ 1782478173568499712
author Guo, Xiaogang
Ding, Jie
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Chu, Shaoli
Lin, Jinxiu
Su, Jinzi
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
author_facet Guo, Xiaogang
Ding, Jie
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Chu, Shaoli
Lin, Jinxiu
Su, Jinzi
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
author_sort Guo, Xiaogang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available randomized clinical trials to compare the left with the right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four electronic databases including the PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and CNKI were searched up to April 2013. In total, there were 22 qualified randomized trials involving 5317 and 4970 patients assigned to the left and the right radial accesses, respectively. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (seconds) (weighted mean difference; 95% confidence interval; P: −36.18; −53.28 to −18.53; <0.0005) and contrast use (mL) (−2.88; −5.41 to −0.34; 0.026) in patients with the left radial access compared to those with the right radial access, and there was strong evidence of heterogeneity but low probability of publication bias. The failure rate of radial access from the left was relatively lower than that from the right (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.68−1.01; P = 0.064). Further in meta-regression analyses, body mass index was found to be a potential source of heterogeneity for both fluoroscopy time (regression coefficient: 35.85; P = 0.025) and catheter number (regression coefficient: 0.35; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that left radial access is preferable to right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time and contrast use for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. The import of this study lies in its great shock to the concept of convenient radial access from the right artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38183502013-11-09 Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients Guo, Xiaogang Ding, Jie Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Chu, Shaoli Lin, Jinxiu Su, Jinzi Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available randomized clinical trials to compare the left with the right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four electronic databases including the PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and CNKI were searched up to April 2013. In total, there were 22 qualified randomized trials involving 5317 and 4970 patients assigned to the left and the right radial accesses, respectively. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (seconds) (weighted mean difference; 95% confidence interval; P: −36.18; −53.28 to −18.53; <0.0005) and contrast use (mL) (−2.88; −5.41 to −0.34; 0.026) in patients with the left radial access compared to those with the right radial access, and there was strong evidence of heterogeneity but low probability of publication bias. The failure rate of radial access from the left was relatively lower than that from the right (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.68−1.01; P = 0.064). Further in meta-regression analyses, body mass index was found to be a potential source of heterogeneity for both fluoroscopy time (regression coefficient: 35.85; P = 0.025) and catheter number (regression coefficient: 0.35; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that left radial access is preferable to right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time and contrast use for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. The import of this study lies in its great shock to the concept of convenient radial access from the right artery. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818350/ /pubmed/24223815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499 Text en © 2013 Guo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guo, Xiaogang
Ding, Jie
Qi, Yue
Jia, Nan
Chu, Shaoli
Lin, Jinxiu
Su, Jinzi
Peng, Feng
Niu, Wenquan
Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title_full Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title_fullStr Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title_short Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
title_sort left radial access is preferable to right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures: a meta-analysis involving 22 randomized clinical trials and 10287 patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499
work_keys_str_mv AT guoxiaogang leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT dingjie leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT qiyue leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT jianan leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT chushaoli leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT linjinxiu leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT sujinzi leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT pengfeng leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients
AT niuwenquan leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients