Cargando…
Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients
OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499 |
_version_ | 1782478173568499712 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Xiaogang Ding, Jie Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Chu, Shaoli Lin, Jinxiu Su, Jinzi Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan |
author_facet | Guo, Xiaogang Ding, Jie Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Chu, Shaoli Lin, Jinxiu Su, Jinzi Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan |
author_sort | Guo, Xiaogang |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available randomized clinical trials to compare the left with the right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four electronic databases including the PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and CNKI were searched up to April 2013. In total, there were 22 qualified randomized trials involving 5317 and 4970 patients assigned to the left and the right radial accesses, respectively. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (seconds) (weighted mean difference; 95% confidence interval; P: −36.18; −53.28 to −18.53; <0.0005) and contrast use (mL) (−2.88; −5.41 to −0.34; 0.026) in patients with the left radial access compared to those with the right radial access, and there was strong evidence of heterogeneity but low probability of publication bias. The failure rate of radial access from the left was relatively lower than that from the right (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.68−1.01; P = 0.064). Further in meta-regression analyses, body mass index was found to be a potential source of heterogeneity for both fluoroscopy time (regression coefficient: 35.85; P = 0.025) and catheter number (regression coefficient: 0.35; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that left radial access is preferable to right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time and contrast use for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. The import of this study lies in its great shock to the concept of convenient radial access from the right artery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38183502013-11-09 Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients Guo, Xiaogang Ding, Jie Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Chu, Shaoli Lin, Jinxiu Su, Jinzi Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The transradial approach has been used extensively for both diagnostic and interventional coronary procedures; however, there is no universal consensus hitherto on the optimal choice of radial access from either the left or the right artery. We therefore sought to meta-analyze available randomized clinical trials to compare the left with the right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four electronic databases including the PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and CNKI were searched up to April 2013. In total, there were 22 qualified randomized trials involving 5317 and 4970 patients assigned to the left and the right radial accesses, respectively. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (seconds) (weighted mean difference; 95% confidence interval; P: −36.18; −53.28 to −18.53; <0.0005) and contrast use (mL) (−2.88; −5.41 to −0.34; 0.026) in patients with the left radial access compared to those with the right radial access, and there was strong evidence of heterogeneity but low probability of publication bias. The failure rate of radial access from the left was relatively lower than that from the right (odds ratio: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.68−1.01; P = 0.064). Further in meta-regression analyses, body mass index was found to be a potential source of heterogeneity for both fluoroscopy time (regression coefficient: 35.85; P = 0.025) and catheter number (regression coefficient: 0.35; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that left radial access is preferable to right radial access in terms of fluoroscopy time and contrast use for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. The import of this study lies in its great shock to the concept of convenient radial access from the right artery. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818350/ /pubmed/24223815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499 Text en © 2013 Guo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Guo, Xiaogang Ding, Jie Qi, Yue Jia, Nan Chu, Shaoli Lin, Jinxiu Su, Jinzi Peng, Feng Niu, Wenquan Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title | Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title_full | Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title_fullStr | Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title_short | Left Radial Access Is Preferable to Right Radial Access for the Diagnostic or Interventional Coronary Procedures: A Meta-Analysis Involving 22 Randomized Clinical Trials and 10287 Patients |
title_sort | left radial access is preferable to right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures: a meta-analysis involving 22 randomized clinical trials and 10287 patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078499 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoxiaogang leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT dingjie leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT qiyue leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT jianan leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT chushaoli leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT linjinxiu leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT sujinzi leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT pengfeng leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients AT niuwenquan leftradialaccessispreferabletorightradialaccessforthediagnosticorinterventionalcoronaryproceduresametaanalysisinvolving22randomizedclinicaltrialsand10287patients |