Cargando…

Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity

This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold press...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vigil, Jacob M., Rowell, Lauren N., Chouteau, Simone, Chavez, Alexandre, Jaramillo, Elisa, Neal, Michael, Waid, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663
_version_ 1782478186600202240
author Vigil, Jacob M.
Rowell, Lauren N.
Chouteau, Simone
Chavez, Alexandre
Jaramillo, Elisa
Neal, Michael
Waid, David
author_facet Vigil, Jacob M.
Rowell, Lauren N.
Chouteau, Simone
Chavez, Alexandre
Jaramillo, Elisa
Neal, Michael
Waid, David
author_sort Vigil, Jacob M.
collection PubMed
description This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold pressor task (CPT) pain sensitivity (i.e., intensity ratings) and core aspects of social networks (e.g., proportion of friends vs. family, affection, affirmation, and aid). Results showed consistent sex differences in how social network structures and intimate relationship functioning modulated pain sensitivity. Females showed higher pain sensitivity when their social networks consisted of a higher proportion of intimate types of relationship partners (e.g., kin vs. non kin), when they had known their network partners for a longer period of time, and when they reported higher levels of logistical support from their significant other (e.g., romantic partner). Conversely, males showed distinct patterns in the opposite direction, including an association between higher levels of logistical support from one’s significant other and lower CPT pain intensity. These findings show for the first time that the direction of sex differences in exogenous pain sensitivity is likely dependent on fundamental components of the individual’s social environment. The utility of a social-signaling perspective of pain behaviors for examining, comparing, and interpreting individual and group differences in experimental and clinical pain reports is discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38184902013-11-09 Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity Vigil, Jacob M. Rowell, Lauren N. Chouteau, Simone Chavez, Alexandre Jaramillo, Elisa Neal, Michael Waid, David PLoS One Research Article This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold pressor task (CPT) pain sensitivity (i.e., intensity ratings) and core aspects of social networks (e.g., proportion of friends vs. family, affection, affirmation, and aid). Results showed consistent sex differences in how social network structures and intimate relationship functioning modulated pain sensitivity. Females showed higher pain sensitivity when their social networks consisted of a higher proportion of intimate types of relationship partners (e.g., kin vs. non kin), when they had known their network partners for a longer period of time, and when they reported higher levels of logistical support from their significant other (e.g., romantic partner). Conversely, males showed distinct patterns in the opposite direction, including an association between higher levels of logistical support from one’s significant other and lower CPT pain intensity. These findings show for the first time that the direction of sex differences in exogenous pain sensitivity is likely dependent on fundamental components of the individual’s social environment. The utility of a social-signaling perspective of pain behaviors for examining, comparing, and interpreting individual and group differences in experimental and clinical pain reports is discussed. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818490/ /pubmed/24223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663 Text en © 2013 Vigil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vigil, Jacob M.
Rowell, Lauren N.
Chouteau, Simone
Chavez, Alexandre
Jaramillo, Elisa
Neal, Michael
Waid, David
Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title_full Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title_fullStr Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title_short Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
title_sort sex differences in how social networks and relationship quality influence experimental pain sensitivity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663
work_keys_str_mv AT vigiljacobm sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT rowelllaurenn sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT chouteausimone sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT chavezalexandre sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT jaramilloelisa sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT nealmichael sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity
AT waiddavid sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity