Cargando…
Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity
This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold press...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663 |
_version_ | 1782478186600202240 |
---|---|
author | Vigil, Jacob M. Rowell, Lauren N. Chouteau, Simone Chavez, Alexandre Jaramillo, Elisa Neal, Michael Waid, David |
author_facet | Vigil, Jacob M. Rowell, Lauren N. Chouteau, Simone Chavez, Alexandre Jaramillo, Elisa Neal, Michael Waid, David |
author_sort | Vigil, Jacob M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold pressor task (CPT) pain sensitivity (i.e., intensity ratings) and core aspects of social networks (e.g., proportion of friends vs. family, affection, affirmation, and aid). Results showed consistent sex differences in how social network structures and intimate relationship functioning modulated pain sensitivity. Females showed higher pain sensitivity when their social networks consisted of a higher proportion of intimate types of relationship partners (e.g., kin vs. non kin), when they had known their network partners for a longer period of time, and when they reported higher levels of logistical support from their significant other (e.g., romantic partner). Conversely, males showed distinct patterns in the opposite direction, including an association between higher levels of logistical support from one’s significant other and lower CPT pain intensity. These findings show for the first time that the direction of sex differences in exogenous pain sensitivity is likely dependent on fundamental components of the individual’s social environment. The utility of a social-signaling perspective of pain behaviors for examining, comparing, and interpreting individual and group differences in experimental and clinical pain reports is discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38184902013-11-09 Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity Vigil, Jacob M. Rowell, Lauren N. Chouteau, Simone Chavez, Alexandre Jaramillo, Elisa Neal, Michael Waid, David PLoS One Research Article This is the first study to examine how both structural and functional components of individuals’ social networks may moderate the association between biological sex and experimental pain sensitivity. One hundred and fifty-two healthy adults (mean age = 22yrs., 53% males) were measured for cold pressor task (CPT) pain sensitivity (i.e., intensity ratings) and core aspects of social networks (e.g., proportion of friends vs. family, affection, affirmation, and aid). Results showed consistent sex differences in how social network structures and intimate relationship functioning modulated pain sensitivity. Females showed higher pain sensitivity when their social networks consisted of a higher proportion of intimate types of relationship partners (e.g., kin vs. non kin), when they had known their network partners for a longer period of time, and when they reported higher levels of logistical support from their significant other (e.g., romantic partner). Conversely, males showed distinct patterns in the opposite direction, including an association between higher levels of logistical support from one’s significant other and lower CPT pain intensity. These findings show for the first time that the direction of sex differences in exogenous pain sensitivity is likely dependent on fundamental components of the individual’s social environment. The utility of a social-signaling perspective of pain behaviors for examining, comparing, and interpreting individual and group differences in experimental and clinical pain reports is discussed. Public Library of Science 2013-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3818490/ /pubmed/24223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663 Text en © 2013 Vigil et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vigil, Jacob M. Rowell, Lauren N. Chouteau, Simone Chavez, Alexandre Jaramillo, Elisa Neal, Michael Waid, David Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title | Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title_full | Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title_fullStr | Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title_short | Sex Differences in How Social Networks and Relationship Quality Influence Experimental Pain Sensitivity |
title_sort | sex differences in how social networks and relationship quality influence experimental pain sensitivity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vigiljacobm sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT rowelllaurenn sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT chouteausimone sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT chavezalexandre sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT jaramilloelisa sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT nealmichael sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity AT waiddavid sexdifferencesinhowsocialnetworksandrelationshipqualityinfluenceexperimentalpainsensitivity |