Cargando…

Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arman, Soroor, Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi, Maracy, Mohamad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250700
_version_ 1782478202014269440
author Arman, Soroor
Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi
Maracy, Mohamad Reza
author_facet Arman, Soroor
Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi
Maracy, Mohamad Reza
author_sort Arman, Soroor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 1934 Adolescents, 11-18 years old. After obtaining the samples consent, SDQ parent rated form and self-rated form were filled. The collected data were analyzed using the STATA statistical package version 9. RESULTS: The adolescents obtained higher total difficulty scores than their parents, but it was not significant (P = 0.203). Boys had higher total difficulty scores than girls by parent informant (P = 0.001), but by self-report girls had higher total difficulty scores than boys (P = 0.42). 11-14 years had higher total difficulty scores by parent report than self-report (P = 0.42), but 15-18 years had higher total difficulty scores by self-report than parent report (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: SDQ self-rating from adolescents may contribute better to the diagnostic process in the clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38186212013-11-18 Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Arman, Soroor Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi Maracy, Mohamad Reza J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 1934 Adolescents, 11-18 years old. After obtaining the samples consent, SDQ parent rated form and self-rated form were filled. The collected data were analyzed using the STATA statistical package version 9. RESULTS: The adolescents obtained higher total difficulty scores than their parents, but it was not significant (P = 0.203). Boys had higher total difficulty scores than girls by parent informant (P = 0.001), but by self-report girls had higher total difficulty scores than boys (P = 0.42). 11-14 years had higher total difficulty scores by parent report than self-report (P = 0.42), but 15-18 years had higher total difficulty scores by self-report than parent report (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: SDQ self-rating from adolescents may contribute better to the diagnostic process in the clinical setting. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3818621/ /pubmed/24250700 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arman, Soroor
Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi
Maracy, Mohamad Reza
Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_full Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_fullStr Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_short Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
title_sort comparison of parent adolescent scores on strengths and difficulties questionnaire
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250700
work_keys_str_mv AT armansoroor comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT amelafsanehkarbasi comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire
AT maracymohamadreza comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire