Cargando…
Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250700 |
_version_ | 1782478202014269440 |
---|---|
author | Arman, Soroor Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi Maracy, Mohamad Reza |
author_facet | Arman, Soroor Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi Maracy, Mohamad Reza |
author_sort | Arman, Soroor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 1934 Adolescents, 11-18 years old. After obtaining the samples consent, SDQ parent rated form and self-rated form were filled. The collected data were analyzed using the STATA statistical package version 9. RESULTS: The adolescents obtained higher total difficulty scores than their parents, but it was not significant (P = 0.203). Boys had higher total difficulty scores than girls by parent informant (P = 0.001), but by self-report girls had higher total difficulty scores than boys (P = 0.42). 11-14 years had higher total difficulty scores by parent report than self-report (P = 0.42), but 15-18 years had higher total difficulty scores by self-report than parent report (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: SDQ self-rating from adolescents may contribute better to the diagnostic process in the clinical setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38186212013-11-18 Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Arman, Soroor Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi Maracy, Mohamad Reza J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent psychiatry has benefited from the application of self-report questionnaires because it is short, less costly and easy to apply. So we select the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and evaluate the agreement between the self-report and parent report form. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 1934 Adolescents, 11-18 years old. After obtaining the samples consent, SDQ parent rated form and self-rated form were filled. The collected data were analyzed using the STATA statistical package version 9. RESULTS: The adolescents obtained higher total difficulty scores than their parents, but it was not significant (P = 0.203). Boys had higher total difficulty scores than girls by parent informant (P = 0.001), but by self-report girls had higher total difficulty scores than boys (P = 0.42). 11-14 years had higher total difficulty scores by parent report than self-report (P = 0.42), but 15-18 years had higher total difficulty scores by self-report than parent report (P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: SDQ self-rating from adolescents may contribute better to the diagnostic process in the clinical setting. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3818621/ /pubmed/24250700 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Arman, Soroor Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi Maracy, Mohamad Reza Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title | Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title_full | Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title_short | Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire |
title_sort | comparison of parent adolescent scores on strengths and difficulties questionnaire |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250700 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armansoroor comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire AT amelafsanehkarbasi comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire AT maracymohamadreza comparisonofparentadolescentscoresonstrengthsanddifficultiesquestionnaire |