Cargando…
Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Protection of the catheter site by antimicrobial agents is one of the most important factors in the prevention of infection. Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate are the most common used agents for dressing. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of povidone iodine,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250702 |
_version_ | 1782478202459914240 |
---|---|
author | Bilir, Ayten Yelken, Birgül Erkan, Ayse |
author_facet | Bilir, Ayten Yelken, Birgül Erkan, Ayse |
author_sort | Bilir, Ayten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Protection of the catheter site by antimicrobial agents is one of the most important factors in the prevention of infection. Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate are the most common used agents for dressing. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of povidone iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine hydrochloride in preventing catheter related infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive; 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% povidone iodine or octenidine hydrochlorodine for cutaneous antisepsis. Cultures were taken at the site surrounding catheter insertion and at the catheter hub after removal to help identify the source of microorganisms. RESULTS: Catheter related sepsis was 10.5% in the povidone iodine and octenidine hydrochlorodine groups. Catheter related colonization was 26.3% in povidone iodine group and 21.5% in octenidine hydrochlorodine group. CONCLUSION: 4% chlorhexidine or octenidine hydrochlorodine for cutaneous disinfection before insertion of an intravascular device and for post-insertion site care can reduce the catheter related colonization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3818623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38186232013-11-18 Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial Bilir, Ayten Yelken, Birgül Erkan, Ayse J Res Med Sci Short Communication BACKGROUND: Protection of the catheter site by antimicrobial agents is one of the most important factors in the prevention of infection. Povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate are the most common used agents for dressing. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of povidone iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine hydrochloride in preventing catheter related infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive; 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% povidone iodine or octenidine hydrochlorodine for cutaneous antisepsis. Cultures were taken at the site surrounding catheter insertion and at the catheter hub after removal to help identify the source of microorganisms. RESULTS: Catheter related sepsis was 10.5% in the povidone iodine and octenidine hydrochlorodine groups. Catheter related colonization was 26.3% in povidone iodine group and 21.5% in octenidine hydrochlorodine group. CONCLUSION: 4% chlorhexidine or octenidine hydrochlorodine for cutaneous disinfection before insertion of an intravascular device and for post-insertion site care can reduce the catheter related colonization. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3818623/ /pubmed/24250702 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Bilir, Ayten Yelken, Birgül Erkan, Ayse Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title | Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: A randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | cholorhexidine, octenidine or povidone iodine for catheter related infections: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24250702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bilirayten cholorhexidineoctenidineorpovidoneiodineforcatheterrelatedinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yelkenbirgul cholorhexidineoctenidineorpovidoneiodineforcatheterrelatedinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT erkanayse cholorhexidineoctenidineorpovidoneiodineforcatheterrelatedinfectionsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |