Cargando…

The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science

Scientific articles are retracted at increasing rates, with the highest rates among top journals. Here we show that a single retraction triggers citation losses through an author's prior body of work. Compared to closely-matched control papers, citations fall by an average of 6.9% per year for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Susan Feng, Jin, Ginger Zhe, Uzzi, Brian, Jones, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24192909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03146
Descripción
Sumario:Scientific articles are retracted at increasing rates, with the highest rates among top journals. Here we show that a single retraction triggers citation losses through an author's prior body of work. Compared to closely-matched control papers, citations fall by an average of 6.9% per year for each prior publication. These chain reactions are sustained on authors' papers (a) published up to a decade earlier and (b) connected within the authors' own citation network by up to 4 degrees of separation from the retracted publication. Importantly, however, citation losses among prior work disappear when authors self-report the error. Our analyses and results span the range of scientific disciplines.