Cargando…

Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center

Objective. To assess the long-term graft survival of right-sided retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN), we compared the outcomes of right- and left-sided RPLDN. Methods. Five hundred and thirty-three patients underwent live donor renal transplantation with allografts procured by RPLDN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omoto, Kazuya, Nozaki, Taiji, Inui, Masashi, Shimizu, Tomokazu, Hirai, Toshihito, Sawada, Yugo, Ishida, Hideki, Tanabe, Kazunari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24228171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/546373
_version_ 1782289923433299968
author Omoto, Kazuya
Nozaki, Taiji
Inui, Masashi
Shimizu, Tomokazu
Hirai, Toshihito
Sawada, Yugo
Ishida, Hideki
Tanabe, Kazunari
author_facet Omoto, Kazuya
Nozaki, Taiji
Inui, Masashi
Shimizu, Tomokazu
Hirai, Toshihito
Sawada, Yugo
Ishida, Hideki
Tanabe, Kazunari
author_sort Omoto, Kazuya
collection PubMed
description Objective. To assess the long-term graft survival of right-sided retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN), we compared the outcomes of right- and left-sided RPLDN. Methods. Five hundred and thirty-three patients underwent live donor renal transplantation with allografts procured by RPLDN from July 2001 to August 2010 at our institute. Of these, 24 (4.5%) cases were selected for right-sided RPLDN (R-RPLDN) according to our criteria for donor kidney selection. Study variables included peri- and postoperative clinical data. Results. No significant differences were found in the recipients' postoperative graft function and incidence of slow graft function. Despite significant increased warm ischemic time (WIT: mean 5.9 min versus 4.7 min, P < 0.001) in R-RPLDN compared to that in L-RPLDN, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding long-term patient and graft survival. The complication rate in R-RPLDN was not significantly different compared to that in L-RPLDN (17% versus 6.5%, P = 0.132). No renal vein thrombosis was experienced in either groups. Conclusions. Although our study was retrospective and there was only a small number of R-RPLDN patients, R-RPLDN could be an option for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy because of similar results, with the sole exception of WIT, in L-RPLDN, and its excellent long-term graft outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38188992013-11-13 Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center Omoto, Kazuya Nozaki, Taiji Inui, Masashi Shimizu, Tomokazu Hirai, Toshihito Sawada, Yugo Ishida, Hideki Tanabe, Kazunari J Transplant Clinical Study Objective. To assess the long-term graft survival of right-sided retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN), we compared the outcomes of right- and left-sided RPLDN. Methods. Five hundred and thirty-three patients underwent live donor renal transplantation with allografts procured by RPLDN from July 2001 to August 2010 at our institute. Of these, 24 (4.5%) cases were selected for right-sided RPLDN (R-RPLDN) according to our criteria for donor kidney selection. Study variables included peri- and postoperative clinical data. Results. No significant differences were found in the recipients' postoperative graft function and incidence of slow graft function. Despite significant increased warm ischemic time (WIT: mean 5.9 min versus 4.7 min, P < 0.001) in R-RPLDN compared to that in L-RPLDN, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding long-term patient and graft survival. The complication rate in R-RPLDN was not significantly different compared to that in L-RPLDN (17% versus 6.5%, P = 0.132). No renal vein thrombosis was experienced in either groups. Conclusions. Although our study was retrospective and there was only a small number of R-RPLDN patients, R-RPLDN could be an option for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy because of similar results, with the sole exception of WIT, in L-RPLDN, and its excellent long-term graft outcomes. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3818899/ /pubmed/24228171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/546373 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kazuya Omoto et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Omoto, Kazuya
Nozaki, Taiji
Inui, Masashi
Shimizu, Tomokazu
Hirai, Toshihito
Sawada, Yugo
Ishida, Hideki
Tanabe, Kazunari
Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title_full Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title_fullStr Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title_short Impact of Right-Sided Nephrectomy on Long-Term Outcomes in Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy at Single Center
title_sort impact of right-sided nephrectomy on long-term outcomes in retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy at single center
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24228171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/546373
work_keys_str_mv AT omotokazuya impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT nozakitaiji impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT inuimasashi impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT shimizutomokazu impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT hiraitoshihito impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT sawadayugo impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT ishidahideki impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter
AT tanabekazunari impactofrightsidednephrectomyonlongtermoutcomesinretroperitoneoscopiclivedonornephrectomyatsinglecenter