Cargando…

Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?

OBJECTIVE: The uroselective α-blocker silodosin significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in two 12-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled Phase III studies in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and maintained symptom improvement dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaplan, Steven A, Roehrborn, Claus G, Hill, Lawrence A, Volinn, Weining
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198640
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S18941
_version_ 1782289930481827840
author Kaplan, Steven A
Roehrborn, Claus G
Hill, Lawrence A
Volinn, Weining
author_facet Kaplan, Steven A
Roehrborn, Claus G
Hill, Lawrence A
Volinn, Weining
author_sort Kaplan, Steven A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The uroselective α-blocker silodosin significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in two 12-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled Phase III studies in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and maintained symptom improvement during a 9-month open-label (OL) extension. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effects of estimated prostate volume (EPV) on silodosin-mediated symptom improvement. METHODS: Patients were stratified by EPV (<30 mL or ≥ 30 mL) calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations using a published algorithm. Group comparisons were done by analysis of covariance with last observations carried forward. RESULTS: Of 890 patients with PSA baseline data, 192 had EPV < 30 mL and 698 had EPV ≥ 30 mL. During DB treatment, silodosin was associated with significant symptom improvement (adjusted mean difference versus placebo) in men with EPV < 30 mL (−2.0; P = 0.038) and those with EPV ≥ 30 mL (−3.0; P < 0.0001). Among patients who received silodosin during DB treatment, changes from baseline in IPSS to the end of OL extension (mean ± standard deviation) were similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 60, −7.0 ± 6.8) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 242, −8.0 ± 7.1; P = 0.416). Also, among patients who received placebo as DB treatment, symptom improvement at the end of OL extension was similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 62, −6.2 ± 8.1) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 275, −6.7 ± 6.1; P = 0.339). CONCLUSION: Silodosin effectively relieved BPH-related symptoms for up to 12 months, irrespective of prostate size, including in patients with enlarged prostates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3818948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38189482013-11-06 Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter? Kaplan, Steven A Roehrborn, Claus G Hill, Lawrence A Volinn, Weining Open Access J Urol Original Research OBJECTIVE: The uroselective α-blocker silodosin significantly improved International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in two 12-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled Phase III studies in men aged ≥ 50 years with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and maintained symptom improvement during a 9-month open-label (OL) extension. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effects of estimated prostate volume (EPV) on silodosin-mediated symptom improvement. METHODS: Patients were stratified by EPV (<30 mL or ≥ 30 mL) calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations using a published algorithm. Group comparisons were done by analysis of covariance with last observations carried forward. RESULTS: Of 890 patients with PSA baseline data, 192 had EPV < 30 mL and 698 had EPV ≥ 30 mL. During DB treatment, silodosin was associated with significant symptom improvement (adjusted mean difference versus placebo) in men with EPV < 30 mL (−2.0; P = 0.038) and those with EPV ≥ 30 mL (−3.0; P < 0.0001). Among patients who received silodosin during DB treatment, changes from baseline in IPSS to the end of OL extension (mean ± standard deviation) were similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 60, −7.0 ± 6.8) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 242, −8.0 ± 7.1; P = 0.416). Also, among patients who received placebo as DB treatment, symptom improvement at the end of OL extension was similar for EPV < 30 mL (n = 62, −6.2 ± 8.1) and EPV ≥ 30 mL (n = 275, −6.7 ± 6.1; P = 0.339). CONCLUSION: Silodosin effectively relieved BPH-related symptoms for up to 12 months, irrespective of prostate size, including in patients with enlarged prostates. Dove Medical Press 2011-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3818948/ /pubmed/24198640 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S18941 Text en © 2011 Kaplan et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kaplan, Steven A
Roehrborn, Claus G
Hill, Lawrence A
Volinn, Weining
Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title_full Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title_fullStr Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title_full_unstemmed Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title_short Effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of BPH: does prostate size matter?
title_sort effect of estimated prostate volume on silodosin-mediated improvements in the signs and symptoms of bph: does prostate size matter?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3818948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198640
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAJU.S18941
work_keys_str_mv AT kaplanstevena effectofestimatedprostatevolumeonsilodosinmediatedimprovementsinthesignsandsymptomsofbphdoesprostatesizematter
AT roehrbornclausg effectofestimatedprostatevolumeonsilodosinmediatedimprovementsinthesignsandsymptomsofbphdoesprostatesizematter
AT hilllawrencea effectofestimatedprostatevolumeonsilodosinmediatedimprovementsinthesignsandsymptomsofbphdoesprostatesizematter
AT volinnweining effectofestimatedprostatevolumeonsilodosinmediatedimprovementsinthesignsandsymptomsofbphdoesprostatesizematter