Cargando…

Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study

In a proof-of-principle prototypical demonstration we describe a new type of brain-machine interface (BMI) paradigm for upper limb motor-training. The proposed technique allows a fast contingent and proportionally modulated stimulation of afferent proprioceptive and motor output neural pathways usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvoni, Stefano, Cavinato, Marianna, Volpato, Chiara, Cisotto, Giulia, Genna, Clara, Agostini, Michela, Turolla, Andrea, Ramos-Murguialday, Ander, Piccione, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00173
_version_ 1782290012325281792
author Silvoni, Stefano
Cavinato, Marianna
Volpato, Chiara
Cisotto, Giulia
Genna, Clara
Agostini, Michela
Turolla, Andrea
Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Piccione, Francesco
author_facet Silvoni, Stefano
Cavinato, Marianna
Volpato, Chiara
Cisotto, Giulia
Genna, Clara
Agostini, Michela
Turolla, Andrea
Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Piccione, Francesco
author_sort Silvoni, Stefano
collection PubMed
description In a proof-of-principle prototypical demonstration we describe a new type of brain-machine interface (BMI) paradigm for upper limb motor-training. The proposed technique allows a fast contingent and proportionally modulated stimulation of afferent proprioceptive and motor output neural pathways using operant learning. Continuous and immediate assisted-feedback of force proportional to rolandic rhythm oscillations during actual movements was employed and illustrated with a single case experiment. One hemiplegic patient was trained for 2 weeks coupling somatosensory brain oscillations with force-field control during a robot-mediated center-out motor-task whose execution approaches movements of everyday life. The robot facilitated actual movements adding a modulated force directed to the target, thus providing a non-delayed proprioceptive feedback. Neuro-electric, kinematic, and motor-behavioral measures were recorded in pre- and post-assessments without force assistance. Patient’s healthy arm was used as control since neither a placebo control was possible nor other control conditions. We observed a generalized and significant kinematic improvement in the affected arm and a spatial accuracy improvement in both arms, together with an increase and focalization of the somatosensory rhythm changes used to provide assisted-force-feedback. The interpretation of the neurophysiological and kinematic evidences reported here is strictly related to the repetition of the motor-task and the presence of the assisted-force-feedback. Results are described as systematic observations only, without firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the methodology. In this prototypical view, the design of appropriate control conditions is discussed. This study presents a novel operant-learning-based BMI-application for motor-training coupling brain oscillations and force feedback during an actual movement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3819641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38196412013-11-09 Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study Silvoni, Stefano Cavinato, Marianna Volpato, Chiara Cisotto, Giulia Genna, Clara Agostini, Michela Turolla, Andrea Ramos-Murguialday, Ander Piccione, Francesco Front Neurol Neuroscience In a proof-of-principle prototypical demonstration we describe a new type of brain-machine interface (BMI) paradigm for upper limb motor-training. The proposed technique allows a fast contingent and proportionally modulated stimulation of afferent proprioceptive and motor output neural pathways using operant learning. Continuous and immediate assisted-feedback of force proportional to rolandic rhythm oscillations during actual movements was employed and illustrated with a single case experiment. One hemiplegic patient was trained for 2 weeks coupling somatosensory brain oscillations with force-field control during a robot-mediated center-out motor-task whose execution approaches movements of everyday life. The robot facilitated actual movements adding a modulated force directed to the target, thus providing a non-delayed proprioceptive feedback. Neuro-electric, kinematic, and motor-behavioral measures were recorded in pre- and post-assessments without force assistance. Patient’s healthy arm was used as control since neither a placebo control was possible nor other control conditions. We observed a generalized and significant kinematic improvement in the affected arm and a spatial accuracy improvement in both arms, together with an increase and focalization of the somatosensory rhythm changes used to provide assisted-force-feedback. The interpretation of the neurophysiological and kinematic evidences reported here is strictly related to the repetition of the motor-task and the presence of the assisted-force-feedback. Results are described as systematic observations only, without firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the methodology. In this prototypical view, the design of appropriate control conditions is discussed. This study presents a novel operant-learning-based BMI-application for motor-training coupling brain oscillations and force feedback during an actual movement. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3819641/ /pubmed/24223567 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00173 Text en Copyright © 2013 Silvoni, Cavinato, Volpato, Cisotto, Genna, Agostini, Turolla, Ramos-Murguialday and Piccione. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Silvoni, Stefano
Cavinato, Marianna
Volpato, Chiara
Cisotto, Giulia
Genna, Clara
Agostini, Michela
Turolla, Andrea
Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
Piccione, Francesco
Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title_full Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title_fullStr Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title_short Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study
title_sort kinematic and neurophysiological consequences of an assisted-force-feedback brain-machine interface training: a case study
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24223567
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2013.00173
work_keys_str_mv AT silvonistefano kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT cavinatomarianna kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT volpatochiara kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT cisottogiulia kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT gennaclara kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT agostinimichela kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT turollaandrea kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT ramosmurguialdayander kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy
AT piccionefrancesco kinematicandneurophysiologicalconsequencesofanassistedforcefeedbackbrainmachineinterfacetrainingacasestudy