Cargando…
The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments
BACKGROUND: Traditional Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) designs assume observations are collected using simple random sampling. Alternatively, randomly sampling clusters of observations and then individuals within clusters reduces costs but decreases the precision of the classifications. In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-10-11 |
_version_ | 1782290018431139840 |
---|---|
author | Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany L Mitsunaga, Tisha Hund, Lauren Olives, Casey Pagano, Marcello |
author_facet | Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany L Mitsunaga, Tisha Hund, Lauren Olives, Casey Pagano, Marcello |
author_sort | Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) designs assume observations are collected using simple random sampling. Alternatively, randomly sampling clusters of observations and then individuals within clusters reduces costs but decreases the precision of the classifications. In this paper, we develop a general framework for designing the cluster(C)-LQAS system and illustrate the method with the design of data quality assessments for the community health worker program in Rwanda. RESULTS: To determine sample size and decision rules for C-LQAS, we use the beta-binomial distribution to account for inflated risk of errors introduced by sampling clusters at the first stage. We present general theory and code for sample size calculations. The C-LQAS sample sizes provided in this paper constrain misclassification risks below user-specified limits. Multiple C-LQAS systems meet the specified risk requirements, but numerous considerations, including per-cluster versus per-individual sampling costs, help identify optimal systems for distinct applications. CONCLUSIONS: We show the utility of C-LQAS for data quality assessments, but the method generalizes to numerous applications. This paper provides the necessary technical detail and supplemental code to support the design of C-LQAS for specific programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3819670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38196702013-11-11 The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany L Mitsunaga, Tisha Hund, Lauren Olives, Casey Pagano, Marcello Emerg Themes Epidemiol Methodology BACKGROUND: Traditional Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) designs assume observations are collected using simple random sampling. Alternatively, randomly sampling clusters of observations and then individuals within clusters reduces costs but decreases the precision of the classifications. In this paper, we develop a general framework for designing the cluster(C)-LQAS system and illustrate the method with the design of data quality assessments for the community health worker program in Rwanda. RESULTS: To determine sample size and decision rules for C-LQAS, we use the beta-binomial distribution to account for inflated risk of errors introduced by sampling clusters at the first stage. We present general theory and code for sample size calculations. The C-LQAS sample sizes provided in this paper constrain misclassification risks below user-specified limits. Multiple C-LQAS systems meet the specified risk requirements, but numerous considerations, including per-cluster versus per-individual sampling costs, help identify optimal systems for distinct applications. CONCLUSIONS: We show the utility of C-LQAS for data quality assessments, but the method generalizes to numerous applications. This paper provides the necessary technical detail and supplemental code to support the design of C-LQAS for specific programs. BioMed Central 2013-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3819670/ /pubmed/24160725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-10-11 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hedt-Gauthier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Hedt-Gauthier, Bethany L Mitsunaga, Tisha Hund, Lauren Olives, Casey Pagano, Marcello The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title | The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title_full | The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title_fullStr | The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title_short | The effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
title_sort | effect of clustering on lot quality assurance sampling: a probabilistic model to calculate sample sizes for quality assessments |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-10-11 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hedtgauthierbethanyl theeffectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT mitsunagatisha theeffectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT hundlauren theeffectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT olivescasey theeffectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT paganomarcello theeffectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT hedtgauthierbethanyl effectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT mitsunagatisha effectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT hundlauren effectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT olivescasey effectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments AT paganomarcello effectofclusteringonlotqualityassurancesamplingaprobabilisticmodeltocalculatesamplesizesforqualityassessments |