Cargando…
A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study
BACKGROUND: Various adjuvants are being used with local anesthetics for prolongation of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine, the highly selective 2 adrenergic agonist is a new neuraxial adjuvant gaining popularity. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in prospective,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24249987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.119151 |
_version_ | 1782290047341428736 |
---|---|
author | Mahendru, Vidhi Tewari, Anurag Katyal, Sunil Grewal, Anju Singh, M Rupinder Katyal, Roohi |
author_facet | Mahendru, Vidhi Tewari, Anurag Katyal, Sunil Grewal, Anju Singh, M Rupinder Katyal, Roohi |
author_sort | Mahendru, Vidhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Various adjuvants are being used with local anesthetics for prolongation of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine, the highly selective 2 adrenergic agonist is a new neuraxial adjuvant gaining popularity. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in prospective, double blind manner. It included 120 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I and II patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia after approval from hospital ethics committee with written and informed consent of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were randomly allocated into four groups (30 patients each). Group BS received 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with normal saline, group BF received 12.5 mg bupivacaine with 25 g fentanyl, group BC received 12.5 mg of bupivacaine supplemented 30 g clonidine, and group BD received 12.5 mg bupivacaine plus 5 g dexmedetomidine. The onset time to reach peak sensory and motor level, the regression time of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Patients in Group BD had significantly longer sensory and motor block times than patients in Groups BC, BF, and BS with Groups BC and BF having comparable duration of sensory and motor block. The mean time of two segment sensory block regression was 147 ± 21 min in Group BD, 117 ± 22 in Group BC, 119 ± 23 in Group BF, and 102 ± 17 in Group BS (P > 0.0001). The regression time of motor block to reach modified Bromage zero (0) was 275 ± 25, 199 ± 26, 196 ± 27, 161 ± 20 in Group BD, BC, BF, and BS, respectively (P > 0.0001). The onset times to reach T8 dermatome and modified Bromage 3 motor block were not significantly different between the groups. Dexmedetomidine group showed significantly less and delayed requirement of rescue analgesic. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine is associated with prolonged motor and sensory block, hemodynamic stability, and reduced demand of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to clonidine, fentanyl, or lone bupivacaine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3819844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38198442013-11-18 A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study Mahendru, Vidhi Tewari, Anurag Katyal, Sunil Grewal, Anju Singh, M Rupinder Katyal, Roohi J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND: Various adjuvants are being used with local anesthetics for prolongation of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Dexmedetomidine, the highly selective 2 adrenergic agonist is a new neuraxial adjuvant gaining popularity. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in prospective, double blind manner. It included 120 American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class I and II patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia after approval from hospital ethics committee with written and informed consent of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients were randomly allocated into four groups (30 patients each). Group BS received 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine with normal saline, group BF received 12.5 mg bupivacaine with 25 g fentanyl, group BC received 12.5 mg of bupivacaine supplemented 30 g clonidine, and group BD received 12.5 mg bupivacaine plus 5 g dexmedetomidine. The onset time to reach peak sensory and motor level, the regression time of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic changes, and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: Patients in Group BD had significantly longer sensory and motor block times than patients in Groups BC, BF, and BS with Groups BC and BF having comparable duration of sensory and motor block. The mean time of two segment sensory block regression was 147 ± 21 min in Group BD, 117 ± 22 in Group BC, 119 ± 23 in Group BF, and 102 ± 17 in Group BS (P > 0.0001). The regression time of motor block to reach modified Bromage zero (0) was 275 ± 25, 199 ± 26, 196 ± 27, 161 ± 20 in Group BD, BC, BF, and BS, respectively (P > 0.0001). The onset times to reach T8 dermatome and modified Bromage 3 motor block were not significantly different between the groups. Dexmedetomidine group showed significantly less and delayed requirement of rescue analgesic. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine is associated with prolonged motor and sensory block, hemodynamic stability, and reduced demand of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to clonidine, fentanyl, or lone bupivacaine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3819844/ /pubmed/24249987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.119151 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mahendru, Vidhi Tewari, Anurag Katyal, Sunil Grewal, Anju Singh, M Rupinder Katyal, Roohi A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title | A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title_full | A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title_fullStr | A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title_short | A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: A double blind controlled study |
title_sort | comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and fentanyl as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower limb surgery: a double blind controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3819844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24249987 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9185.119151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahendruvidhi acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT tewarianurag acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT katyalsunil acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT grewalanju acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT singhmrupinder acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT katyalroohi acomparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT mahendruvidhi comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT tewarianurag comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT katyalsunil comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT grewalanju comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT singhmrupinder comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy AT katyalroohi comparisonofintrathecaldexmedetomidineclonidineandfentanylasadjuvantstohyperbaricbupivacaineforlowerlimbsurgeryadoubleblindcontrolledstudy |