Cargando…

Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback

[Purpose] The leg angles that are the most effective for abdominal muscle activation were investigated by performing abdominal drawing-in exercises at different leg angles with a biofeedback pressure unit. [Methods] Subjects were asked to adopt a supine position, and the tip of the biofeedback press...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jun-Cheol, Lee, Su-Kyoung, Kim, Kyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24259770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1255
_version_ 1782290096086581248
author Lee, Jun-Cheol
Lee, Su-Kyoung
Kim, Kyoung
author_facet Lee, Jun-Cheol
Lee, Su-Kyoung
Kim, Kyoung
author_sort Lee, Jun-Cheol
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The leg angles that are the most effective for abdominal muscle activation were investigated by performing abdominal drawing-in exercises at different leg angles with a biofeedback pressure unit. [Methods] Subjects were asked to adopt a supine position, and the tip of the biofeedback pressure unit was placed under the posterior superior iliac spine. Then, the pressure was adjusted to 40 mmHg while referring to the pressure gauge connected to the biofeedback pressure unit. Subjects were instructed to increase the pressure by 10 mmHg using the drawing-in technique upon the oral instruction, “Start,” and to maintain the drawn-in state. The time during which the pressure was maintained within an error range of ±1–2mmHg was measured in seconds. [Result] During the abdominal drawing-in exercises, the activity of the rectus abdominis, the internal and external obliques, and the transverse abdominis increased as the knee joint flexion angle increased from 45° to 120°. [Conclusion] When trunk stabilization exercises are performed at the same pressure to reduce damage after the acute phase of low back pain, trunk muscle strength can be efficiently increased by increasing the knee joint angle gradually, while performing abdominal drawing-in exercises with a biofeedback pressure unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3820180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38201802013-11-20 Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback Lee, Jun-Cheol Lee, Su-Kyoung Kim, Kyoung J Phys Ther Sci Original [Purpose] The leg angles that are the most effective for abdominal muscle activation were investigated by performing abdominal drawing-in exercises at different leg angles with a biofeedback pressure unit. [Methods] Subjects were asked to adopt a supine position, and the tip of the biofeedback pressure unit was placed under the posterior superior iliac spine. Then, the pressure was adjusted to 40 mmHg while referring to the pressure gauge connected to the biofeedback pressure unit. Subjects were instructed to increase the pressure by 10 mmHg using the drawing-in technique upon the oral instruction, “Start,” and to maintain the drawn-in state. The time during which the pressure was maintained within an error range of ±1–2mmHg was measured in seconds. [Result] During the abdominal drawing-in exercises, the activity of the rectus abdominis, the internal and external obliques, and the transverse abdominis increased as the knee joint flexion angle increased from 45° to 120°. [Conclusion] When trunk stabilization exercises are performed at the same pressure to reduce damage after the acute phase of low back pain, trunk muscle strength can be efficiently increased by increasing the knee joint angle gradually, while performing abdominal drawing-in exercises with a biofeedback pressure unit. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2013-11-20 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3820180/ /pubmed/24259770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1255 Text en 2013©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original
Lee, Jun-Cheol
Lee, Su-Kyoung
Kim, Kyoung
Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title_full Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title_fullStr Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title_short Comparison of Abdominal Muscle Activity in Relation to Knee Angles during Abdominal Drawing-in Exercises Using Pressure Biofeedback
title_sort comparison of abdominal muscle activity in relation to knee angles during abdominal drawing-in exercises using pressure biofeedback
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24259770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1255
work_keys_str_mv AT leejuncheol comparisonofabdominalmuscleactivityinrelationtokneeanglesduringabdominaldrawinginexercisesusingpressurebiofeedback
AT leesukyoung comparisonofabdominalmuscleactivityinrelationtokneeanglesduringabdominaldrawinginexercisesusingpressurebiofeedback
AT kimkyoung comparisonofabdominalmuscleactivityinrelationtokneeanglesduringabdominaldrawinginexercisesusingpressurebiofeedback