Cargando…

MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience

Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant ly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espinel, C. Francisco, Keating, Shaughn, Hibshoosh, Hanina, Taback, Bret, Joseph, Kathie-Ann, El-Tamer, Mahmoud, Feldman, Sheldon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278759
http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507
_version_ 1782290142278451200
author Espinel, C. Francisco
Keating, Shaughn
Hibshoosh, Hanina
Taback, Bret
Joseph, Kathie-Ann
El-Tamer, Mahmoud
Feldman, Sheldon
author_facet Espinel, C. Francisco
Keating, Shaughn
Hibshoosh, Hanina
Taback, Bret
Joseph, Kathie-Ann
El-Tamer, Mahmoud
Feldman, Sheldon
author_sort Espinel, C. Francisco
collection PubMed
description Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant lymph nodes. TargetPrint (TP) is an assay for assessing estrogen, progesterone, and HER2-neu receptor status based on mRNA expression. A potential limitation of these assays is that they require an evaluation of fresh tissue samples. There is limited published experience describing MP or TP implementation. Methods. Over 10 months, 4 breast surgeons obtained samples from 54 patients for MP/TP analysis. The samples were analyzed by Agendia Labs. The tumors were independently evaluated for receptor status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Retrospectively, we identified patients who were assessed by MP/TP during this period. Patients who underwent OncotypeDx evaluation were also identified. Results. Of the 54 patients receiving MP, 4 were found ineligible for MP risk assessment because >3 lymph nodes were found to be malignant. Out of all eligible patients, 14/50 (28%) had samples whose quantity of tumor was not sufficient for analysis (QNS). Out of eligible patients with tumors <1 cm, 7/8 (88%) had QNS samples. 7/42 with tumors ≥1 cm (17%) had QNS samples. Nine patients had discordant receptor results when evaluated by IHC versus. TP. Of patients who also underwent OncotypeDx testing, 6/14 (43%) had discordant results with MP. Conclusions. This study indicates that using MP/TP assay is feasible in a tertiary care center but there may be utility in limiting MP testing to patients with tumors between 1 and 5 cm due to high likelihood of uninformative results in subcentimeter tumors. Further study is needed to explore the discordance between oncotype and MP results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3820467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38204672013-11-25 MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience Espinel, C. Francisco Keating, Shaughn Hibshoosh, Hanina Taback, Bret Joseph, Kathie-Ann El-Tamer, Mahmoud Feldman, Sheldon Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant lymph nodes. TargetPrint (TP) is an assay for assessing estrogen, progesterone, and HER2-neu receptor status based on mRNA expression. A potential limitation of these assays is that they require an evaluation of fresh tissue samples. There is limited published experience describing MP or TP implementation. Methods. Over 10 months, 4 breast surgeons obtained samples from 54 patients for MP/TP analysis. The samples were analyzed by Agendia Labs. The tumors were independently evaluated for receptor status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Retrospectively, we identified patients who were assessed by MP/TP during this period. Patients who underwent OncotypeDx evaluation were also identified. Results. Of the 54 patients receiving MP, 4 were found ineligible for MP risk assessment because >3 lymph nodes were found to be malignant. Out of all eligible patients, 14/50 (28%) had samples whose quantity of tumor was not sufficient for analysis (QNS). Out of eligible patients with tumors <1 cm, 7/8 (88%) had QNS samples. 7/42 with tumors ≥1 cm (17%) had QNS samples. Nine patients had discordant receptor results when evaluated by IHC versus. TP. Of patients who also underwent OncotypeDx testing, 6/14 (43%) had discordant results with MP. Conclusions. This study indicates that using MP/TP assay is feasible in a tertiary care center but there may be utility in limiting MP testing to patients with tumors between 1 and 5 cm due to high likelihood of uninformative results in subcentimeter tumors. Further study is needed to explore the discordance between oncotype and MP results. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3820467/ /pubmed/24278759 http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507 Text en Copyright © 2012 C. Francisco Espinel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Espinel, C. Francisco
Keating, Shaughn
Hibshoosh, Hanina
Taback, Bret
Joseph, Kathie-Ann
El-Tamer, Mahmoud
Feldman, Sheldon
MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title_full MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title_fullStr MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title_full_unstemmed MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title_short MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
title_sort mammaprint feasibility in a large tertiary urban medical center: an initial experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278759
http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507
work_keys_str_mv AT espinelcfrancisco mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT keatingshaughn mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT hibshooshhanina mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT tabackbret mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT josephkathieann mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT eltamermahmoud mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience
AT feldmansheldon mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience