Cargando…
MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience
Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant ly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278759 http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507 |
_version_ | 1782290142278451200 |
---|---|
author | Espinel, C. Francisco Keating, Shaughn Hibshoosh, Hanina Taback, Bret Joseph, Kathie-Ann El-Tamer, Mahmoud Feldman, Sheldon |
author_facet | Espinel, C. Francisco Keating, Shaughn Hibshoosh, Hanina Taback, Bret Joseph, Kathie-Ann El-Tamer, Mahmoud Feldman, Sheldon |
author_sort | Espinel, C. Francisco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant lymph nodes. TargetPrint (TP) is an assay for assessing estrogen, progesterone, and HER2-neu receptor status based on mRNA expression. A potential limitation of these assays is that they require an evaluation of fresh tissue samples. There is limited published experience describing MP or TP implementation. Methods. Over 10 months, 4 breast surgeons obtained samples from 54 patients for MP/TP analysis. The samples were analyzed by Agendia Labs. The tumors were independently evaluated for receptor status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Retrospectively, we identified patients who were assessed by MP/TP during this period. Patients who underwent OncotypeDx evaluation were also identified. Results. Of the 54 patients receiving MP, 4 were found ineligible for MP risk assessment because >3 lymph nodes were found to be malignant. Out of all eligible patients, 14/50 (28%) had samples whose quantity of tumor was not sufficient for analysis (QNS). Out of eligible patients with tumors <1 cm, 7/8 (88%) had QNS samples. 7/42 with tumors ≥1 cm (17%) had QNS samples. Nine patients had discordant receptor results when evaluated by IHC versus. TP. Of patients who also underwent OncotypeDx testing, 6/14 (43%) had discordant results with MP. Conclusions. This study indicates that using MP/TP assay is feasible in a tertiary care center but there may be utility in limiting MP testing to patients with tumors between 1 and 5 cm due to high likelihood of uninformative results in subcentimeter tumors. Further study is needed to explore the discordance between oncotype and MP results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3820467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38204672013-11-25 MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience Espinel, C. Francisco Keating, Shaughn Hibshoosh, Hanina Taback, Bret Joseph, Kathie-Ann El-Tamer, Mahmoud Feldman, Sheldon Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article Background. The MammaPrint (MP) diagnostic assay stratifies breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups using mRNA analysis of a 70-gene profile. The assay is validated for assessment of patients with estrogen receptor positive or negative tumors less than 5 cm with 3 or fewer malignant lymph nodes. TargetPrint (TP) is an assay for assessing estrogen, progesterone, and HER2-neu receptor status based on mRNA expression. A potential limitation of these assays is that they require an evaluation of fresh tissue samples. There is limited published experience describing MP or TP implementation. Methods. Over 10 months, 4 breast surgeons obtained samples from 54 patients for MP/TP analysis. The samples were analyzed by Agendia Labs. The tumors were independently evaluated for receptor status using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Retrospectively, we identified patients who were assessed by MP/TP during this period. Patients who underwent OncotypeDx evaluation were also identified. Results. Of the 54 patients receiving MP, 4 were found ineligible for MP risk assessment because >3 lymph nodes were found to be malignant. Out of all eligible patients, 14/50 (28%) had samples whose quantity of tumor was not sufficient for analysis (QNS). Out of eligible patients with tumors <1 cm, 7/8 (88%) had QNS samples. 7/42 with tumors ≥1 cm (17%) had QNS samples. Nine patients had discordant receptor results when evaluated by IHC versus. TP. Of patients who also underwent OncotypeDx testing, 6/14 (43%) had discordant results with MP. Conclusions. This study indicates that using MP/TP assay is feasible in a tertiary care center but there may be utility in limiting MP testing to patients with tumors between 1 and 5 cm due to high likelihood of uninformative results in subcentimeter tumors. Further study is needed to explore the discordance between oncotype and MP results. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3820467/ /pubmed/24278759 http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507 Text en Copyright © 2012 C. Francisco Espinel et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Espinel, C. Francisco Keating, Shaughn Hibshoosh, Hanina Taback, Bret Joseph, Kathie-Ann El-Tamer, Mahmoud Feldman, Sheldon MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title | MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title_full | MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title_fullStr | MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title_short | MammaPrint Feasibility in a Large Tertiary Urban Medical Center: An Initial Experience |
title_sort | mammaprint feasibility in a large tertiary urban medical center: an initial experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24278759 http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/942507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espinelcfrancisco mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT keatingshaughn mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT hibshooshhanina mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT tabackbret mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT josephkathieann mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT eltamermahmoud mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience AT feldmansheldon mammaprintfeasibilityinalargetertiaryurbanmedicalcenteraninitialexperience |