Cargando…

Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?

INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belansky, Elaine S., Cutforth, Nick, Gilbert, Lynn, Litt, Jill, Reed, Hannah, Scarbro, Sharon, Marshall, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24199737
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002
_version_ 1782290150627213312
author Belansky, Elaine S.
Cutforth, Nick
Gilbert, Lynn
Litt, Jill
Reed, Hannah
Scarbro, Sharon
Marshall, Julie A.
author_facet Belansky, Elaine S.
Cutforth, Nick
Gilbert, Lynn
Litt, Jill
Reed, Hannah
Scarbro, Sharon
Marshall, Julie A.
author_sort Belansky, Elaine S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey was administered to a random sample of principals, physical education (PE) teachers, and food-service managers in 45 rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado. Response rates were 71% in 2005 and 89% in 2011. RESULTS: Minutes for PE and recess did not increase, nor did offerings of fresh fruits and vegetables. More schools adopted policies prohibiting teachers from taking recess away as punishment (9.7% in 2005 vs 38.5% in 2011, P = .02) or for making up missed instructional time, class work, or tests in other subjects (3.2% in 2005 vs 28.2% in 2011, P = .03). More schools scheduled recess before lunch (22.6% in 2005 vs 46.2% in 2011, P = .04) and developed policies for vending machines (42.9% in 2005 vs 85.7% in 2011, P = .01) and parties (21.4% in 2005 vs 57.9% in 2011, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Changes in school practices are modest, and arguably the important school practices such as increased PE and recess time and increased offerings of fruits and vegetables in the lunch line have not changed in the 5 years since the mandate went into effect. Further investigation is needed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as financial and physical resources required for school administrators to make changes in school practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3820520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38205202013-12-10 Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? Belansky, Elaine S. Cutforth, Nick Gilbert, Lynn Litt, Jill Reed, Hannah Scarbro, Sharon Marshall, Julie A. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey was administered to a random sample of principals, physical education (PE) teachers, and food-service managers in 45 rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado. Response rates were 71% in 2005 and 89% in 2011. RESULTS: Minutes for PE and recess did not increase, nor did offerings of fresh fruits and vegetables. More schools adopted policies prohibiting teachers from taking recess away as punishment (9.7% in 2005 vs 38.5% in 2011, P = .02) or for making up missed instructional time, class work, or tests in other subjects (3.2% in 2005 vs 28.2% in 2011, P = .03). More schools scheduled recess before lunch (22.6% in 2005 vs 46.2% in 2011, P = .04) and developed policies for vending machines (42.9% in 2005 vs 85.7% in 2011, P = .01) and parties (21.4% in 2005 vs 57.9% in 2011, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Changes in school practices are modest, and arguably the important school practices such as increased PE and recess time and increased offerings of fruits and vegetables in the lunch line have not changed in the 5 years since the mandate went into effect. Further investigation is needed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as financial and physical resources required for school administrators to make changes in school practices. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3820520/ /pubmed/24199737 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Belansky, Elaine S.
Cutforth, Nick
Gilbert, Lynn
Litt, Jill
Reed, Hannah
Scarbro, Sharon
Marshall, Julie A.
Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title_full Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title_fullStr Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title_full_unstemmed Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title_short Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
title_sort local wellness policy 5 years later: is it making a difference for students in low-income, rural colorado elementary schools?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24199737
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002
work_keys_str_mv AT belanskyelaines localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT cutforthnick localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT gilbertlynn localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT littjill localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT reedhannah localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT scarbrosharon localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools
AT marshalljuliea localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools