Cargando…
Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools?
INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24199737 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002 |
_version_ | 1782290150627213312 |
---|---|
author | Belansky, Elaine S. Cutforth, Nick Gilbert, Lynn Litt, Jill Reed, Hannah Scarbro, Sharon Marshall, Julie A. |
author_facet | Belansky, Elaine S. Cutforth, Nick Gilbert, Lynn Litt, Jill Reed, Hannah Scarbro, Sharon Marshall, Julie A. |
author_sort | Belansky, Elaine S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey was administered to a random sample of principals, physical education (PE) teachers, and food-service managers in 45 rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado. Response rates were 71% in 2005 and 89% in 2011. RESULTS: Minutes for PE and recess did not increase, nor did offerings of fresh fruits and vegetables. More schools adopted policies prohibiting teachers from taking recess away as punishment (9.7% in 2005 vs 38.5% in 2011, P = .02) or for making up missed instructional time, class work, or tests in other subjects (3.2% in 2005 vs 28.2% in 2011, P = .03). More schools scheduled recess before lunch (22.6% in 2005 vs 46.2% in 2011, P = .04) and developed policies for vending machines (42.9% in 2005 vs 85.7% in 2011, P = .01) and parties (21.4% in 2005 vs 57.9% in 2011, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Changes in school practices are modest, and arguably the important school practices such as increased PE and recess time and increased offerings of fruits and vegetables in the lunch line have not changed in the 5 years since the mandate went into effect. Further investigation is needed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as financial and physical resources required for school administrators to make changes in school practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3820520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38205202013-12-10 Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? Belansky, Elaine S. Cutforth, Nick Gilbert, Lynn Litt, Jill Reed, Hannah Scarbro, Sharon Marshall, Julie A. Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: The federally mandated Local Wellness Policy (LWP) was intended to promote student health in schools. This study assesses the 5-year effects of the LWP on the health practices of rural elementary schools in Colorado. METHODS: One year before and 5 years after the LWP mandate, a survey was administered to a random sample of principals, physical education (PE) teachers, and food-service managers in 45 rural, low-income elementary schools in Colorado. Response rates were 71% in 2005 and 89% in 2011. RESULTS: Minutes for PE and recess did not increase, nor did offerings of fresh fruits and vegetables. More schools adopted policies prohibiting teachers from taking recess away as punishment (9.7% in 2005 vs 38.5% in 2011, P = .02) or for making up missed instructional time, class work, or tests in other subjects (3.2% in 2005 vs 28.2% in 2011, P = .03). More schools scheduled recess before lunch (22.6% in 2005 vs 46.2% in 2011, P = .04) and developed policies for vending machines (42.9% in 2005 vs 85.7% in 2011, P = .01) and parties (21.4% in 2005 vs 57.9% in 2011, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Changes in school practices are modest, and arguably the important school practices such as increased PE and recess time and increased offerings of fruits and vegetables in the lunch line have not changed in the 5 years since the mandate went into effect. Further investigation is needed to identify the knowledge, skills, and attitudes as well as financial and physical resources required for school administrators to make changes in school practices. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3820520/ /pubmed/24199737 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Belansky, Elaine S. Cutforth, Nick Gilbert, Lynn Litt, Jill Reed, Hannah Scarbro, Sharon Marshall, Julie A. Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title | Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title_full | Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title_fullStr | Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title_full_unstemmed | Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title_short | Local Wellness Policy 5 Years Later: Is It Making a Difference for Students in Low-Income, Rural Colorado Elementary Schools? |
title_sort | local wellness policy 5 years later: is it making a difference for students in low-income, rural colorado elementary schools? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3820520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24199737 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.130002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belanskyelaines localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT cutforthnick localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT gilbertlynn localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT littjill localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT reedhannah localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT scarbrosharon localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools AT marshalljuliea localwellnesspolicy5yearslaterisitmakingadifferenceforstudentsinlowincomeruralcoloradoelementaryschools |