Cargando…

Depth of Central Venous Catheterization by Intracardiac Electrocardiogram in Adults

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheterization is done frequently in cardiac surgery and intensive care settings. Faulty positioning of the catheter can cause many complications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to study the average depth of insertion and formulate a general guideline through the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Prerana N., Kane, Deepa, Appukutty, Jithesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3821129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24244919
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.7557
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Central venous catheterization is done frequently in cardiac surgery and intensive care settings. Faulty positioning of the catheter can cause many complications. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to study the average depth of insertion and formulate a general guideline through the right internal jugular vein (IJV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The right IJV was cannulated over a period of four months and catheter tip positioning was guided by means of an intracardiac electrocardiogram (ECG). Insertion depth was registered at the position of maximum P wave amplitude and the catheter was fixed after withdrawing 2 cm. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to categorize any relationship between plots of distance versus patient’s height, and regression lines and equations were also calculated. Bland-Altman analysis of data was done to compare the old formulae with our derived formulae. RESULTS: A total of 155 adult patients were studied. Distances measured were found to be highly correlated with a patient’s height, followed by body surface area (BSA) and weight. For right IJV cannulation in valvular surgeries in adults, the depth of insertion (cm) was (height in cm / 15) + 2 ± 1.58 (SD) and in non-valvular surgeries in adults, it was (height in cm/15) + 1.4 ± 1.47 (SD). The bias was very small when the new formulae were compared to the existing formulae. CONCLUSIONS: The devised formulae predicted the required depth of catheters thereby reducing the possibility of complications and need for radiographic confirmation.