Cargando…

Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level

BACKGROUND: Group-level results suggest that relative to healthy controls (HCs), ultra-high-risk (UHR) and first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects show alterations in neuroanatomy, neurofunction and cognition that may be mediated genetically. It is unclear, however, whether these groups can be differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pettersson-Yeo, W., Benetti, S., Marquand, A. F., Dell‘Acqua, F., Williams, S. C. R., Allen, P., Prata, D., McGuire, P., Mechelli, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3821374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329171300024X
_version_ 1782290295603331072
author Pettersson-Yeo, W.
Benetti, S.
Marquand, A. F.
Dell‘Acqua, F.
Williams, S. C. R.
Allen, P.
Prata, D.
McGuire, P.
Mechelli, A.
author_facet Pettersson-Yeo, W.
Benetti, S.
Marquand, A. F.
Dell‘Acqua, F.
Williams, S. C. R.
Allen, P.
Prata, D.
McGuire, P.
Mechelli, A.
author_sort Pettersson-Yeo, W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Group-level results suggest that relative to healthy controls (HCs), ultra-high-risk (UHR) and first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects show alterations in neuroanatomy, neurofunction and cognition that may be mediated genetically. It is unclear, however, whether these groups can be differentiated at single-subject level, for instance using the machine learning analysis support vector machine (SVM). Here, we used a multimodal approach to examine the ability of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor neuroimaging (DTI), genetic and cognitive data to differentiate between UHR, FEP and HC subjects at the single-subject level using SVM. METHOD: Three age- and gender-matched SVM paired comparison groups were created comprising 19, 19 and 15 subject pairs for FEP versus HC, UHR versus HC and FEP versus UHR, respectively. Genetic, sMRI, DTI, fMRI and cognitive data were obtained for each participant and the ability of each to discriminate subjects at the individual level in conjunction with SVM was tested. RESULTS: Successful classification accuracies (p < 0.05) comprised FEP versus HC (genotype, 67.86%; DTI, 65.79%; fMRI, 65.79% and 68.42%; cognitive data, 73.69%), UHR versus HC (sMRI, 68.42%; DTI, 65.79%), and FEP versus UHR (sMRI, 76.67%; fMRI, 73.33%; cognitive data, 66.67%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FEP subjects are identifiable at the individual level using a range of biological and cognitive measures. Comparatively, only sMRI and DTI allowed discrimination of UHR from HC subjects. For the first time FEP and UHR subjects have been shown to be directly differentiable at the single-subject level using cognitive, sMRI and fMRI data. Preliminarily, the results support clinical development of SVM to help inform identification of FEP and UHR subjects, though future work is needed to provide enhanced levels of accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3821374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38213742013-11-09 Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level Pettersson-Yeo, W. Benetti, S. Marquand, A. F. Dell‘Acqua, F. Williams, S. C. R. Allen, P. Prata, D. McGuire, P. Mechelli, A. Psychol Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Group-level results suggest that relative to healthy controls (HCs), ultra-high-risk (UHR) and first-episode psychosis (FEP) subjects show alterations in neuroanatomy, neurofunction and cognition that may be mediated genetically. It is unclear, however, whether these groups can be differentiated at single-subject level, for instance using the machine learning analysis support vector machine (SVM). Here, we used a multimodal approach to examine the ability of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor neuroimaging (DTI), genetic and cognitive data to differentiate between UHR, FEP and HC subjects at the single-subject level using SVM. METHOD: Three age- and gender-matched SVM paired comparison groups were created comprising 19, 19 and 15 subject pairs for FEP versus HC, UHR versus HC and FEP versus UHR, respectively. Genetic, sMRI, DTI, fMRI and cognitive data were obtained for each participant and the ability of each to discriminate subjects at the individual level in conjunction with SVM was tested. RESULTS: Successful classification accuracies (p < 0.05) comprised FEP versus HC (genotype, 67.86%; DTI, 65.79%; fMRI, 65.79% and 68.42%; cognitive data, 73.69%), UHR versus HC (sMRI, 68.42%; DTI, 65.79%), and FEP versus UHR (sMRI, 76.67%; fMRI, 73.33%; cognitive data, 66.67%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FEP subjects are identifiable at the individual level using a range of biological and cognitive measures. Comparatively, only sMRI and DTI allowed discrimination of UHR from HC subjects. For the first time FEP and UHR subjects have been shown to be directly differentiable at the single-subject level using cognitive, sMRI and fMRI data. Preliminarily, the results support clinical development of SVM to help inform identification of FEP and UHR subjects, though future work is needed to provide enhanced levels of accuracy. Cambridge University Press 2013-12 2013-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3821374/ /pubmed/23507081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329171300024X Text en © Cambridge University Press 2013 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pettersson-Yeo, W.
Benetti, S.
Marquand, A. F.
Dell‘Acqua, F.
Williams, S. C. R.
Allen, P.
Prata, D.
McGuire, P.
Mechelli, A.
Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title_full Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title_fullStr Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title_full_unstemmed Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title_short Using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
title_sort using genetic, cognitive and multi-modal neuroimaging data to identify ultra-high-risk and first-episode psychosis at the individual level
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3821374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329171300024X
work_keys_str_mv AT petterssonyeow usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT benettis usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT marquandaf usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT dellacquaf usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT williamsscr usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT allenp usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT pratad usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT mcguirep usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel
AT mechellia usinggeneticcognitiveandmultimodalneuroimagingdatatoidentifyultrahighriskandfirstepisodepsychosisattheindividuallevel