Cargando…

Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study

OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the time doctors and nurses spent on direct patient care, medication-related tasks, and interactions before and after electronic medication management system (eMMS) introduction. METHODS: Controlled pre–post, time and motion study of 129 doctors and nurses for 633....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westbrook, Johanna I, Li, Ling, Georgiou, Andrew, Paoloni, Richard, Cullen, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001414
_version_ 1782290385761992704
author Westbrook, Johanna I
Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Paoloni, Richard
Cullen, John
author_facet Westbrook, Johanna I
Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Paoloni, Richard
Cullen, John
author_sort Westbrook, Johanna I
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the time doctors and nurses spent on direct patient care, medication-related tasks, and interactions before and after electronic medication management system (eMMS) introduction. METHODS: Controlled pre–post, time and motion study of 129 doctors and nurses for 633.2 h on four wards in a 400-bed hospital in Sydney, Australia. We measured changes in proportions of time on tasks and interactions by period, intervention/control group, and profession. RESULTS: eMMS was associated with no significant change in proportions of time spent on direct care or medication-related tasks relative to control wards. In the post-period control ward, doctors spent 19.7% (2 h/10 h shift) of their time on direct care and 7.4% (44.4 min/10 h shift) on medication tasks, compared to intervention ward doctors (25.7% (2.6 h/shift; p=0.08) and 8.5% (51 min/shift; p=0.40), respectively). Control ward nurses in the post-period spent 22.1% (1.9 h/8.5 h shift) of their time on direct care and 23.7% on medication tasks compared to intervention ward nurses (26.1% (2.2 h/shift; p=0.23) and 22.6% (1.9 h/shift; p=0.28), respectively). We found intervention ward doctors spent less time alone (p=0.0003) and more time with other doctors (p=0.003) and patients (p=0.009). Nurses on the intervention wards spent less time with doctors following eMMS introduction (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: eMMS introduction did not result in redistribution of time away from direct care or towards medication tasks. Work patterns observed on these intervention wards were associated with previously reported significant reductions in prescribing error rates relative to the control wards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3822109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38221092013-12-11 Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study Westbrook, Johanna I Li, Ling Georgiou, Andrew Paoloni, Richard Cullen, John J Am Med Inform Assoc Focus on Patient Care OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the time doctors and nurses spent on direct patient care, medication-related tasks, and interactions before and after electronic medication management system (eMMS) introduction. METHODS: Controlled pre–post, time and motion study of 129 doctors and nurses for 633.2 h on four wards in a 400-bed hospital in Sydney, Australia. We measured changes in proportions of time on tasks and interactions by period, intervention/control group, and profession. RESULTS: eMMS was associated with no significant change in proportions of time spent on direct care or medication-related tasks relative to control wards. In the post-period control ward, doctors spent 19.7% (2 h/10 h shift) of their time on direct care and 7.4% (44.4 min/10 h shift) on medication tasks, compared to intervention ward doctors (25.7% (2.6 h/shift; p=0.08) and 8.5% (51 min/shift; p=0.40), respectively). Control ward nurses in the post-period spent 22.1% (1.9 h/8.5 h shift) of their time on direct care and 23.7% on medication tasks compared to intervention ward nurses (26.1% (2.2 h/shift; p=0.23) and 22.6% (1.9 h/shift; p=0.28), respectively). We found intervention ward doctors spent less time alone (p=0.0003) and more time with other doctors (p=0.003) and patients (p=0.009). Nurses on the intervention wards spent less time with doctors following eMMS introduction (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: eMMS introduction did not result in redistribution of time away from direct care or towards medication tasks. Work patterns observed on these intervention wards were associated with previously reported significant reductions in prescribing error rates relative to the control wards. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-11 2013-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3822109/ /pubmed/23715803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001414 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Focus on Patient Care
Westbrook, Johanna I
Li, Ling
Georgiou, Andrew
Paoloni, Richard
Cullen, John
Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title_full Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title_fullStr Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title_short Impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
title_sort impact of an electronic medication management system on hospital doctors’ and nurses’ work: a controlled pre–post, time and motion study
topic Focus on Patient Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23715803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001414
work_keys_str_mv AT westbrookjohannai impactofanelectronicmedicationmanagementsystemonhospitaldoctorsandnursesworkacontrolledpreposttimeandmotionstudy
AT liling impactofanelectronicmedicationmanagementsystemonhospitaldoctorsandnursesworkacontrolledpreposttimeandmotionstudy
AT georgiouandrew impactofanelectronicmedicationmanagementsystemonhospitaldoctorsandnursesworkacontrolledpreposttimeandmotionstudy
AT paolonirichard impactofanelectronicmedicationmanagementsystemonhospitaldoctorsandnursesworkacontrolledpreposttimeandmotionstudy
AT cullenjohn impactofanelectronicmedicationmanagementsystemonhospitaldoctorsandnursesworkacontrolledpreposttimeandmotionstudy