Cargando…

The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals

OBJECTIVES: To compare the manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two electronic prescribing systems (e-PS). To determine if the rate of system-related prescribing errors is greater than the rate of errors prevented. METHODS: Audit of 629 inpatient admissions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westbrook, Johanna I, Baysari, Melissa T, Li, Ling, Burke, Rosemary, Richardson, Katrina L, Day, Richard O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23721982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001745
_version_ 1782290386211831808
author Westbrook, Johanna I
Baysari, Melissa T
Li, Ling
Burke, Rosemary
Richardson, Katrina L
Day, Richard O
author_facet Westbrook, Johanna I
Baysari, Melissa T
Li, Ling
Burke, Rosemary
Richardson, Katrina L
Day, Richard O
author_sort Westbrook, Johanna I
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two electronic prescribing systems (e-PS). To determine if the rate of system-related prescribing errors is greater than the rate of errors prevented. METHODS: Audit of 629 inpatient admissions at two hospitals in Sydney, Australia using the CSC MedChart and Cerner Millennium e-PS. System related errors were classified by manifestation (eg, wrong dose), mechanism, and severity. A mechanism typology comprised errors made: selecting items from drop-down menus; constructing orders; editing orders; or failing to complete new e-PS tasks. Proportions and rates of errors by manifestation, mechanism, and e-PS were calculated. RESULTS: 42.4% (n=493) of 1164 prescribing errors were system-related (78/100 admissions). This result did not differ by e-PS (MedChart 42.6% (95% CI 39.1 to 46.1); Cerner 41.9% (37.1 to 46.8)). For 13.4% (n=66) of system-related errors there was evidence that the error was detected prior to study audit. 27.4% (n=135) of system-related errors manifested as timing errors and 22.5% (n=111) wrong drug strength errors. Selection errors accounted for 43.4% (34.2/100 admissions), editing errors 21.1% (16.5/100 admissions), and failure to complete new e-PS tasks 32.0% (32.0/100 admissions). MedChart generated more selection errors (OR=4.17; p=0.00002) but fewer new task failures (OR=0.37; p=0.003) relative to the Cerner e-PS. The two systems prevented significantly more errors than they generated (220/100 admissions (95% CI 180 to 261) vs 78 (95% CI 66 to 91)). CONCLUSIONS: System-related errors are frequent, yet few are detected. e-PS require new tasks of prescribers, creating additional cognitive load and error opportunities. Dual classification, by manifestation and mechanism, allowed identification of design features which increase risk and potential solutions. e-PS designs with fewer drop-down menu selections may reduce error risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3822121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38221212013-12-11 The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals Westbrook, Johanna I Baysari, Melissa T Li, Ling Burke, Rosemary Richardson, Katrina L Day, Richard O J Am Med Inform Assoc Focus on Patient Care OBJECTIVES: To compare the manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two electronic prescribing systems (e-PS). To determine if the rate of system-related prescribing errors is greater than the rate of errors prevented. METHODS: Audit of 629 inpatient admissions at two hospitals in Sydney, Australia using the CSC MedChart and Cerner Millennium e-PS. System related errors were classified by manifestation (eg, wrong dose), mechanism, and severity. A mechanism typology comprised errors made: selecting items from drop-down menus; constructing orders; editing orders; or failing to complete new e-PS tasks. Proportions and rates of errors by manifestation, mechanism, and e-PS were calculated. RESULTS: 42.4% (n=493) of 1164 prescribing errors were system-related (78/100 admissions). This result did not differ by e-PS (MedChart 42.6% (95% CI 39.1 to 46.1); Cerner 41.9% (37.1 to 46.8)). For 13.4% (n=66) of system-related errors there was evidence that the error was detected prior to study audit. 27.4% (n=135) of system-related errors manifested as timing errors and 22.5% (n=111) wrong drug strength errors. Selection errors accounted for 43.4% (34.2/100 admissions), editing errors 21.1% (16.5/100 admissions), and failure to complete new e-PS tasks 32.0% (32.0/100 admissions). MedChart generated more selection errors (OR=4.17; p=0.00002) but fewer new task failures (OR=0.37; p=0.003) relative to the Cerner e-PS. The two systems prevented significantly more errors than they generated (220/100 admissions (95% CI 180 to 261) vs 78 (95% CI 66 to 91)). CONCLUSIONS: System-related errors are frequent, yet few are detected. e-PS require new tasks of prescribers, creating additional cognitive load and error opportunities. Dual classification, by manifestation and mechanism, allowed identification of design features which increase risk and potential solutions. e-PS designs with fewer drop-down menu selections may reduce error risk. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-11 2013-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3822121/ /pubmed/23721982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001745 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Focus on Patient Care
Westbrook, Johanna I
Baysari, Melissa T
Li, Ling
Burke, Rosemary
Richardson, Katrina L
Day, Richard O
The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title_full The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title_fullStr The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title_full_unstemmed The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title_short The safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
title_sort safety of electronic prescribing: manifestations, mechanisms, and rates of system-related errors associated with two commercial systems in hospitals
topic Focus on Patient Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3822121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23721982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001745
work_keys_str_mv AT westbrookjohannai thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT baysarimelissat thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT liling thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT burkerosemary thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT richardsonkatrinal thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT dayrichardo thesafetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT westbrookjohannai safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT baysarimelissat safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT liling safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT burkerosemary safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT richardsonkatrinal safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals
AT dayrichardo safetyofelectronicprescribingmanifestationsmechanismsandratesofsystemrelatederrorsassociatedwithtwocommercialsystemsinhospitals